I am running for president in 2012
- Thread starter milton waddams
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2012
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
Apparently, you don't have to know our nation's history either. Somehow, even though there is documented evidence that Columbus (and the other settlers) forcefully removed Indians from this land, which would mean that they would have to be occupying it in the first place, Mr. Waddams seems to think that it never happened and that Indians didn't rightfully control "America" before it came to be America.
:dunno:
You can run for two things at once, right? Ah fuck it, I'll use a fake name for the Senate :dunno: no one will notice. I mean if we hook them all up to twitter we'll keep em' dumb forever
Yeah, sure, whatever........take your pick.
Marlo Manson
Hello Sexy girl how your Toes doing?
BB had to be thinking presidentacy when he found out who was running, IMO he had to think bigger! due the the lack of competence, I fully accept and endorse both Will E Worm and Blue Balls declaring they are viable canidates for president of the united states.. may the best man win!! :yesyes:
IMO the only competent canidate to date before BB threw his name in, was Will E Worm, I was thinking he could handle the duties required.
So to be fair I feel these 2 canidates are definitely less of a risk than the other 2 canidates B.Randal and M.Waddams!! :eek:
Last edited:
BlueBalls, do you have a "four-in" minister yet? If not, can I apply for the position?
please use correct spelling when typing, after all you are graduated from HARVARD, aren't ya?
ghetto crowd language isn't appropriated, but proper english with correct spelling and grammar is the appropriate language.
BlueBalls, do you have a "four-in" minister yet? If not, can I apply for the position?
Of course you can, that doesnt mean you're going to get it. But you know what they say, you scratch my balls and I'll scratch yours
Wait.......do they say that? Or is it just my uncle Gerald?
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
Most people will be voting for me.
You can run, but I will win in a landslide. :hatsoff:
Thats fine, I'll still have my Senate seat to fall back on.
But if I do win, they'll be heck to pay! Heck I tell ya!!!
You'll be shocked... i might just make the thread, but you both need to have running mates....
We'll put your legions to the test!
BlueBalls for FO president 2012!!!!!!
I'm sorry, but your platform is awful. Not to say that you wouldn't do better than our current administration.
1. Direct election of Supreme Court justices. - Yeah because we need high school drop out interpreting the Constitution.
2. Outlaw parents hitting children. - What? Beating your children is the only thing that makes them worth having, and it makes them better people.
3. Legalize public nudity. - I've got no problem with it, but I get to stare as much as I want.
4. 13th grade added to high school. - It's called college.
5. Federal standard for statutory rape laws. - Nope, the federal government has enough power.
6. Subsidize organic food. - No, regular food is fine.
7. Legalize postmortem cannibalism. - I guess, if the person wills their body to you.
8. Constitutional amendment to abolish underwear. - No I enjoy the support.
9. Return lands wrongfully taken from Native Americans. - Where would we live?
10. Legalize peyote. - Knock yourself out.
1. Direct election of Supreme Court justices. - Yeah because we need high school drop out interpreting the Constitution.
2. Outlaw parents hitting children. - What? Beating your children is the only thing that makes them worth having, and it makes them better people.
3. Legalize public nudity. - I've got no problem with it, but I get to stare as much as I want.
4. 13th grade added to high school. - It's called college.
5. Federal standard for statutory rape laws. - Nope, the federal government has enough power.
6. Subsidize organic food. - No, regular food is fine.
7. Legalize postmortem cannibalism. - I guess, if the person wills their body to you.
8. Constitutional amendment to abolish underwear. - No I enjoy the support.
9. Return lands wrongfully taken from Native Americans. - Where would we live?
10. Legalize peyote. - Knock yourself out.
I second the same.
Here is the thing that I find interesting.
Presidential candidates tell us they are going to do a list of things. In almost all cases the powers of the president don't support doing very few if any of them.
A president can't make laws, he can only choose to sign or veto a law that congress gives him.
Some would say, but the president has influence. Maybe, but Oprah has influence too and she's not the president. The thing I hated about the last election was that we had two sitting members of congress telling us what they were going to do when they were president and I was asking myself, "Why are you not pushing that legislation through congress now?" They had the powers to actually get the ball rolling.
If you want drug legislation to change, there again its congress that does that. Congress can pass a law without the presidents signature if they have a large enough majority voting in favor it.
Creating cabinet positions and appointing nominees to cabinet posts is done by the Senate.
In all reality, aside from executive orders to executive departments, the president can only change certain things without congress.
As for giving back land to the Native Americans, I don't think the president or congress would be able to do it. The Supreme Court wouldn't alllow. The only possible way would be eminent domain, where the government would have to pay land owners for their property. Even if it was the size of one or two states, that would bankrupt the government.
Lastly, Milton from the two threads that I've read of yours, I get the impression you would not be old enough constitutionally to be confirmed by the electoral college as the president.
I personally would like to see what kind of damage you could do to a city government first.
Presidential candidates tell us they are going to do a list of things. In almost all cases the powers of the president don't support doing very few if any of them.
A president can't make laws, he can only choose to sign or veto a law that congress gives him.
Some would say, but the president has influence. Maybe, but Oprah has influence too and she's not the president. The thing I hated about the last election was that we had two sitting members of congress telling us what they were going to do when they were president and I was asking myself, "Why are you not pushing that legislation through congress now?" They had the powers to actually get the ball rolling.
If you want drug legislation to change, there again its congress that does that. Congress can pass a law without the presidents signature if they have a large enough majority voting in favor it.
Creating cabinet positions and appointing nominees to cabinet posts is done by the Senate.
In all reality, aside from executive orders to executive departments, the president can only change certain things without congress.
As for giving back land to the Native Americans, I don't think the president or congress would be able to do it. The Supreme Court wouldn't alllow. The only possible way would be eminent domain, where the government would have to pay land owners for their property. Even if it was the size of one or two states, that would bankrupt the government.
Lastly, Milton from the two threads that I've read of yours, I get the impression you would not be old enough constitutionally to be confirmed by the electoral college as the president.
I personally would like to see what kind of damage you could do to a city government first.
Glad to have you aboard sir
I get the feeling BlueBalls might be a better, more level headed and truthful candidate than Milton.
I hope you'll keep you me in mind for Press Secretary or Secretary of Commerce.
You can't go wrong with Ben Dover!
Wainkerr99
Closed Account
Behind every successful man there is a woman. Who does BlueBalls have I wonder.
And I wonder who will it be next.
I wonder.
Wonder I do.
As for Mr. Waddams.......
And I wonder who will it be next.
I wonder.
Wonder I do.
As for Mr. Waddams.......
Lots of people have influence in different ways, but the president is the leader of his party and can help to shape debate in the congress. I think Pelosi and Reid are more likely to listen to Obama then Oprah. This of course would create a problem for independents and third parties if there was a president elected who had little support in the congress. I wonder if this is even possible, meaning there might have to be a base in congress already representing independents/third parties in order for the president to have the popular support to be elected. This just means it would be more difficult for third parties/independents, but not impossible.
Congress and the president have already returned certain lands to Native Americans throghout the 20th century and there were other bills that would have returned other lands but were never passed. I have read a lot about Native American history. Don't take my word for it, look into it. If you are worried about the Supreme Court, look at the decision called Lonewolf v. Hitchcock. This decision is extremely detrimental to the interests of Native American freedom and should be overturned. As for eminent domain, that doesn't apply to Native Americans and their lands because if the lands were taken improperly, they legally and morally should be returned to their rightful owners with no necessary compensation to the present occupants. It wouldn't necessarily bankrupt the government if their was a transition phase and if the decolonized indian territories could federate together and carry on trade with foreign countries such as the U.S. while allowing non-Native Americans to become citizens within Indian territories. I don't know what the full implications of such actions would be, but there is no reason to assume it couldn't occur in a sensible manner that would avoid catastrophe. Plus, there is a moral and legal question about returning land, as i have already stated. One could say that if the U.S. went bankrupt as a result of returning Indian lands then that is what the U.S. deserves based on its atrocious record in dealing with Native Americans.
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
That's not always true. Females can be more of a hindrance to some.
Similar threads
