Re: How's this'to cheer ya' up: Girl blasts school officials over her friends gang ra
what he said was that if this was a mexican kid gangraped by a group of whites all hell would break loose, there would be retaliation crimes, the news media would be all over it like vultures and the whites would be charged with a hate crime.
I know it's a long thread, but apparently you've (conveniently) missed quite a few of his posts... and quite a few of mine as well. If that's
ALL he had said, then I would have probably agreed with that sentiment, and nothing more would have been said. But if you can find a post where I have
ever said that there is NOT sometimes a double standard in these types of cases, I'll give you a gold star for the day. But since no such post exists, no need to make room on your hat for one. This is generally why I am not in favor of hate crimes legislation: if a person has indeed committed a crime, then our legal system
should convict them of that crime - if not, then that's a failing of our legal system. More laws, IMO, do not fix a broken or flawed system. If burning a cross is illegal, then convict whatever moron that's burned the cross of that crime. If it's illegal to punch someone in the face, then convict the person who does that of assault - what they call the person as they hit them is immaterial, IMO. But I don't understand how a person can be convicted of a hate crime (assuming violence here), and not be convicted of the underlying crime.
I'm sure there are cases where that may not be so clear (civil rights violations or something like that), but generally speaking, I mean violent crimes. While the motivation might be based on hate, racism or sexism, the (true) crime is whatever act was committed. Otherwise, you end up with what we have in this thread: people adding 2+2 and getting 22... because they
believe in their hearts (with whatever make believe social theories that they've concocted) that the motivation can be determined based on the race, religion or gender of the accused vs. the victim.
it would be front page news for a long time and chaos.
whoever would deny that is either in denial or in a cave.
remember tawana brawly (al sharptons big break) or duke lacrosse.
the media circus, the protests, the chaos......and those rapes never even happened.
the last part about the coyotes raping mexican girls is true also I believe.
alot of heavy duty violence among those people.
Yep, and like I said, two sides of the same coin. I see Rev. Al types as brothers from another mother when matched with David Duke types.
So whats actually the problem with those statements?
See above.
Because the same person posted things which seemed to GREATLY conflict with one another, and some of these things I did not agree with.
shouldn't twist someones words either.
Shouldn't pick & choose which posts one chooses to read either... that's assuming you want to make a complete, cognisant point.
