Madman_1_0 said:
hardest is football because there are all the paterns and the physical part
Actually, it would help if "hard" was better defined.
American football is a very, very involved, intellectual sport -- both technique and strategy-wise.
And not just for the "glory positions," but even things like the offensive line.
Most people who enjoy chess LOVE American football once they get past the "brawn" of it all.
Especially since there are defined stops and starts -- set up your pieces, execute, planning moves many, many, MANY moves ahead of the current.
There is a "gameplan" -- and most coaches and coordinators pre-script many posessions, especailly at the beginning of the game (although they change them as necessary in "near real-time.").
But I don't know if I can belittle other sports that are more aerobic, they are just more aerobic, but still great studies.
There is still a great amount of strategy to soccer (football) and basketball, and a lot goes underappreicated.
One might argue that takes more practice and work to mesh the "pure atheletism" with the actual, "real-time strategy" involved.
It all depends on the definition of "hard."
It's say baseball isn't very "hard" in any sense other than some abilities.
But for my interpretation of "hard," I'm looking to the player and his ability.
In that regard, even though I've NEVER played it myself, hockey is definitely the "hardest."
You do NOT have your foot control like you do in the other *4* sports mentioned here.
Even lacross is not nearly as difficult as hocky for the same reasons, it's a real TOLL on the athlete -- and takes great skill and precision to master.
So intellectually, American football takes the cake in my view, but it's not as "aerobic" as other sports.
But overall, hockey is the CLEAR WINNER in many areas, especially the overall combinations of skill of the athlete.
I have to tip my hat to the athletes of that game, even though I've never played it.
Just my opinions.