Let's see, if I had never taken this position, I would *probably* still be managing some online division of Playboy. OR I might be the greeter at Walmart. I really love my current position and quite honestly love being a part of the MetArt family...I have no plans to change direction any time soon but if I am forced to think of what I would do next, I imagine I would stay in this industry in some sort of marketing or executive role. OR I might be the greeter at Walmart.
Also, Met-Art seemingly doesn't have very many American models. Is your home base mostly Europe namely Eastern Europe? You seem to find alot of Russian, Croatian, Hungarian, and Polish models. Is it that the market over there for this type of work is just more accessible or is that the look that you cater to? Are American women considered too "porn like" for the Met Art site as opposed to some of your other website affiliates? I can think of a number of great American models that would be great for a set with any of a number of your Met-Art contributing photographers.
Thanks for all the quality over the years. I wish the Met Art and it's affiliates continued success.
I was wondering where Met-Art is going with your network of sites? You've got quite an interesting collection, with Holly Randall, ALS Scan (my favorite site on the internet), Viv Thomas, Michael Ninn, etc. How large and eclectic a network are you all aiming for? What should we be anticipating in terms of your network?
Gah, I don't want to hog up all the questions/bandwidth, but one doesn't get this opportunity too often... so, what the hell, two more questions of a more personal/philosophical nature:
1. Have you told your family/friends about working in online porn/erotica? If so, was it difficult to tell them and what did they think?
2. What do you say to critics of erotica/porn that say it's anti-feminist and reinforces misogynistic attitudes such as men thinking it's OK to objectify women?
Somewhat personal question for Jill
How do/how have the guys in your life (boyfriend(s)/husband/whatever) reacted to what you do for a living? Have any of them had a reaction one way or another about it?
dou yo have any work with little wheeled boards
do you have a favorite lip color that you like on other women
Do you hire?
I do not like that system with assigning numbers. Since one person might rate a girl as a 5 whereas another, for the same perceived "value", would assign a 7, you don't get either a ratio or a nominal scale that way. It only works for one individual's preferences. Never, ever, try to use a ratio scale to measure something that is inherently non-parametric. I would prefer to allow the users to rank the girls against each other by asking them if one set is better than another, or to distribute 100 points between the models; that way you will soon be able to rank the models/photographers/scenes on an ordinal scale.
...
Anyway, none of these things will affect *my* use of the site. I'm not going to point out this model or that who should be dropped from that list either, because that would be rude. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and the current system is broken.
...
As sevrin said/suggested, I have to wonder how many of our older favorites (Jenya D, Iveta B, Ariel, Anna AJ, Altea B, Sofi A... just to name a few) would only have have done maybe half the sets they've done if they'd been under the new system, considering that now they're not even in the Top 150.
I want to make one more suggestion regarding the ratings system; I don't know if this would be doable, but it might be interesting to try and incorporate a feature where users can rank, say, their own top 10, 20 50, 100, etc. models. As for why:Solrage, Sevrin, Ovidius - thanks for your discussion and feedback on the rating system...it's just this type of information that allows us to review our processes and determine methods that work best for our members. We will definitely review your comments and discuss internally as there is always room for improvement.
See, this is what I was leery of as well. It's what you might call "backlash voting" where top models are given "1s" solely because some users despise them being ranked so highly. I see this all the time on IMDb where new movies come out, receive a rash of "10s," and then the backlash starts and it receives a rash of "1s" from users who are rating more against the hype than they are rating the movie itself. That's what I think happened with the MA rankings. I don't think any sane human being is going to give Iveta B (eg) a "1" if you showed them a gallery in isolation. However, tell them that she's a #1 ranked model, and suddenly you'll see such a backlash of 1s. It's very unfair to the models, and to those users who don't "backlash rate," or try to polarize their votes (10s to their favorites, 1s to the others) to have the maximum affect on the rankings.I'll give you my personal opinion of why some of the MetArt "greats" dropped. I think for the months and months that some girls sat at #1, they were the recipient of low votes from members who didn't like them specifically because they were at #1. These low votes were not counted and the girls at #1 received an inordinate amount of them. Now that we count them, they've dropped. I will look into see if we can filter these "spiteful" low votes out.
I mentioned this on one of the recent blog posts on SexArt that asked users for suggestions of what content they'd like to see, but I'll mention it again here just to get the word out a bit more: outside of MA/SA, the best erotic/pornographic work I've seen in recent years are the last two feature films by a director named Graham Travis. His Portrait of a Call Girl and Wasteland are really my ideal for what quality, feature length porn/erotica would be. I know SexArt hasn't dipped into the world of feature length hardcore yet (Kamikaze Love being sofcore), and I don't know if anyone in the MA Network is familiar with his work, but it would be awesome if you could either work with him, or take some inspiration from his work for any possible/potential feature length narrative films in the future.I mentioned in a previous response that the network has grown because of our desire to work with talented artists with similar ideals while bringing a variation of content into the Network.
Thanks for the response. I've often wondered what I'd say to my family if I went into such a business (I come from a very conservative background, though I'm more a liberal). As much as one might feel that there's nothing wrong/immoral about erotica and pornography (I very much view it as I do all art, and that's as a beautiful expression of life), it's often hard to convey that feeling to people who are both close to you and whom you know don't share the same view. It's tricky stuff, I can imagine.My immediate family and close friends know that I work in this industry...it was difficult to tell some of them and with the majority of them, my career is not something we discuss regularly or openly. With some, my very closest friends, they are very supportive, nonjudgmental, and often intrigued about my line of work.
I'll come back to #2...excellent question!
To go back to my "Top 10/20/50/etc." model rankings by individual users, one benefit of that system is that it avoids the whole backlash/polarizing problem. Users get to say who their favorites are with a nice system that goes beyond the 1-10 ratings scale because it actually would allow them to say which of their 10s (and maybe 9s, depending on how far the rankings went) are their top favorites. I actually got this idea from the trend right now in the world of film where cinephiles, critics, etc. make such lists of their favorite films/filmmakers that generate a ton of interesting discussion and debate as well as awareness (one only has to look at the ubiquity of lists like those from AFI, Sight and Sound, and now Theyshootpictures in online discussions). People seem to love making such lists, and for a site with such devoted fans as MA, I bet you'd have a lot of people interested in contributing their own.
I mentioned this on one of the recent blog posts on SexArt that asked users for suggestions of what content they'd like to see, but I'll mention it again here just to get the word out a bit more: outside of MA/SA, the best erotic/pornographic work I've seen in recent years are the last two feature films by a director named Graham Travis. His Portrait of a Call Girl and Wasteland are really my ideal for what quality, feature length porn/erotica would be. I know SexArt hasn't dipped into the world of feature length hardcore yet (Kamikaze Love being sofcore), and I don't know if anyone in the MA Network is familiar with his work, but it would be awesome if you could either work with him, or take some inspiration from his work for any possible/potential feature length narrative films in the future.
Jill - As a potential customer, what direction do you think MetArt needs to take in the next 1-3 years that makes your suite of sites more appealing to sign up for versus the thousands of sites currently out there?
What does excite you of erotic photography?
While nudity is the main aim of MetArt, sexy clothing and accessories can really create a stunning look. Do you get to choose what shoes, underwear jewelery etc you wear?
What has brought Met-Art from being the best in soft-core porn, to being the best in both hardcore and soft-core?
During the last few months MetArt has made a bold move to become "Another" adult-content cluster.
MetArt being a site where high quality is a common standard and having a well stablished market image,
well earned by fifteen-plus years of meticulous work; My question is: What's the point of intermixing
Met with some other old sites that are a world apart from the quality and image that we were use to?.
I, being myself a MetArt active member, kind of dislike that heterogeneous mixture of everything under
the same brand name.(and the downloading quality has suffer also, by the way).
I can't wait to read your thoughts on this issue, thanks beforehand.
If you become a greeter at a Walmart near my location, expect to be seeing me there regularly.
Again, I already have a monthly Sex-Art membership, but I'm a sucker for games, so I'll take a shot: Iveta B?
Uhm now I NEED to see a faceshot of her!!!
Why weren't you comfy? You have nice well-kept feet.
Haha you're so silly, now you surely want to hear things like "oh no you're super hot".
Seriously I think with a good met-art-y makeup you could easily pose for them yourself. It would be popular, but not like a freak show.
Ha, I would have said that, too. She's my all-time favorite!
Quote Originally Posted by Met-Art View Post
Who knows which MetArt model held the #1 rank for the longest amount of time?
I'm guess Jenya D
Met Art has always worked with both male and female photographers. Considering your definition of erotism, as a way to revere the female (by the way, only female?) form and revealing its beauty from within, do you think there's a difference between the work of male and female photographers?
I'm guessing Andrea was the girl who was number 1 the longest.
I have difficulty choosing between my 10s, but my personal rankings would probably be:
1. Iveta B
2. Jenya D
3. Ariel Piper Fawn
4. Eufrat A
(These were the models responsible for hooking me as a member)
5. Mia Sollis
6. Loreen A
7. Iga A
8. Nikky Case
9. Sofi A
10. Natalia A
11. Alisa G
12. Nina A
13. Indiana A
14. Altea B
15. Ulya I
16. Catherine A
17. Peach A
18. Natalia B
19. Kisa A
20. Lidiya A
These would've been my second and third guesses, though I thought perhaps Andrea C was before there was a ranking system (was there always a ranking system?) as I didn't notice a "Top 10" logo on any of her sets. Jenya D would've been my second guess, though.
I love your style of shooting but do you ever shoot or feature any 'curvier' girls?
If you ended up as a Walmart greeter, how long would it take for you to start beating people with your roll of smiley face stickers??
All great guesses for #1 model for the longest time, but keep trying! Nobody has gotten it yet!