a sad day in indianapolis...as a colt fan...this man is the true gentlemen of this league
great man but I think he is overrated as a coach. He had the best defense in Tampa Bay and could not win a championship. The year he leaves, Tampa Bay wins the Super Bowl. Then for 7 seasons he has the best offense in the league and the greatest QB of his generation and only wins one title and makes it to only one other championship game. He is a very good coach. Not a great one and certainly not a Hall of Famer, like many are saying.
- Career record of 139-69-0
- Winning % of 66.83%, which is 7th best of all-time, I believe
- 1 Super Bowl victory
- 2 AFC Championship victories
- 10 straight playoff appearances by a head coach (NFL record)
- Teamed with Monte Kiffin to invent the Tampa 2 defense, which is one of the most copied and successful defenses of our era
- Took over as the head coach for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers (who hadn't had a winning record for the previous 15 years) and turned them around into a serious franchise that could compete with any other team in the NFL
- Took over as the head coach for the Indianapolis Colts, who had an established offense, but no defense at all, and turned them into a team with one of the best pass defenses in the NFL
He has the 7th best winning % of all-time, but you don't think he's a great coach? He took his respective team to the playoffs for an NFL record 10 consecutive years, but you don't think he's a great coach? He took two seperate, weak franchises and turned them both into teams that nobody wants to play, but you don't think he's a great coach? He was the co-creator of the most feared and successful defensive scheme of our era, but you don't think he's a great coach?
I uh...I disagree. Tony Dungy is a great coach and the NFL (and all of it's fans) should consider themselves lucky to have seen such a great talent.
I have noticed that my definition of greatness, compared to other people's definitions, is usually more conservative. If Tony Dungey is a great coach, then so are Mike Holmgren, Mike Shanahan and Bill Cowher. I only consider these coaches very good coaches like Dungy, who have won Super Bowl(s) and have had many winning seasons. To me there are only a handful of greats in any sport. And usually there are only one or two of them in a given era.
So with that being said I would have to say that only coaches like Walsh, Johnson, Parcells and Bellicheck fit into my definition of the great coaches of the last 25 years.
I have noticed that my definition of greatness, compared to other people's definitions, is usually more conservative. If Tony Dungey is a great coach, then so are Mike Holmgren, Mike Shanahan and Bill Cowher. I only consider these coaches very good coaches like Dungy, who have won Super Bowl(s) and have had many winning seasons. To me there are only a handful of greats in any sport. And usually there are only one or two of them in a given era.
So with that being said I would have to say that only coaches like Walsh, Johnson, Parcells and Bellicheck fit into my definition of the great coaches of the last 25 years.
That's almost the equivalent to saying unless a player is about as good as Jim Brown, Payton Manning, Walter Payton, Reggie White, Lawrence Taylor, or Joe Montana they don't belong in the hall of fame either. By that standard it would be almost empty. Plus you bring up Parcells who while good has always been overrated. I hope your not judging coaches mainly on Superbowl wins, because that wouldn't make any sense. I would say Dungy, Cowher, and Shanahan are all better than him. While a lot of people remember Holmgen for his years in Seattle, it's easy to forget his time in Green Bay where he was pretty good also. Plus if there is two good people per era who are the ones now. It seems like the would be Bilichick and........Tony Dungy.
You used the argument before that Tony Dungy had an already established, great offense before he became the coach of the Colts, somehow acting like that takes away some sort of credibility that he has as a coach. Yet, you say that Bill Walsh is a great coach. You mean the same Bill Walsh who had an offense made up of a Pro Bowl type of roster? If anything, the offense that Bill Walsh had was even better than that of Tony Dungy's Colts, so I don't understand your definition of "great".
Then, to paraphrase, you say that you don't consider a coach to be "great" if they have a bunch of winning seasons and a few Super Bowl wins. Umm, what do you think Bill Parcells' career was like? He "only" had 2 Super Bowl wins in his 19 years of coaching; Tony Dungy had 1 Super Bowl in 8 less years. Yet, you say that Bill Parcells is great, but Tony Dungy is not.
The same goes for Jimmy Johnson. 2 Super Bowl wins, yet you claim he is great, but not Tony Dungy. Also, to further my confusion with your defintion of "great", you say that Jimmy Johnson is great, but not Mike Shanahan.
Jimmy Johnson has a career record of 89-68 (56.69%)
Mike Shanahan has a career record of 146-95 (60.58%) - better than Jimmy Johnson
Jimmy Johnson is one of only six NFL head coaches to win consecutive Super Bowls
Mike Shanahan is also one of only six NFL head coaches to win consecutive Super Bowls
Jimmy Johnson - Great
Mike Shanahan - Not?
:dunno:
A terrific coach who carried himself with grace and dignity. I don't believe his heart was truly back into coaching after his son's death however. Maybe after a few seasons off, we'll see him back. Either way, best of luck to you, Tony.
great man but I think he is overrated as a coach. He had the best defense in Tampa Bay and could not win a championship. The year he leaves, Tampa Bay wins the Super Bowl. Then for 7 seasons he has the best offense in the league and the greatest QB of his generation and only wins one title and makes it to only one other championship game. He is a very good coach. Not a great one and certainly not a Hall of Famer, like many are saying.