• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

do you believe 911 was an inside job

TheOrangeCat

AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
have another question, which may seem obvious bhuuut .....

Let's say WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.

Why?

The building was empty, and had it not collapsed of its own free will, it probably would have been demolished anyway, but if there is a conspiracy, there needs to be a reason.

And I don't see why anyone would conspire to secretly demolish an empty building in broad daylight, when given the massive hole in it, and the ominous creaking sounds, and the fact all firefighters were drawn back because of the risk of collapse, it was coming down one way or another.

Where's the motive? The Shadow Government secretly and deliberately felled an empty building to ......

Cover up evidece in the Secret Service, CIA or IRS offices there. Well, if it was a conspiracy, surely all that would have been removed before, since foreknowledge is at the heart of the conspiracy.

Or else, these cunning and devious conspirators decided to use the worst way possible to cover up secret files by blowing those Top Secret Documents half across Manhattan and just hoping none of them would survive the blast or be forced out by the pressure wave.

OK, maybe the collapse of the building was because of all the thermite packed in accidently being set off through fires or some other witchcraft. Well, then, it's not controlled, is it?

See, I've had the misfortune of reading the copious ramblings on many conspiracy sites and I've yet to find any of them that really address the why. There has to be a why or there's no reason at all to do it.
 

John_8581

FreeOnes Lifetime Member
KilltheIndustry said:
I'm curious WTC7WasPulled... Just how many were in on it, set it all up, knowingly killed thousands, and to this day are still lying and covering it up? Tell me. How many?

Because the stairwells were destroyed in the North Tower or the South Tower you can take your choice, due to the burning of the leaking jet fuel from the downed airplanes, and the massive explosions, due to the melting of the offices, computers, then the walls, sheet rock, wood, and eventually the structure collapse due to the melting of the steel girders and the erosion of the buildings. Yes, because the planes crashed into them, both Towers became unstable.

Possibly WTC7WasPulled needed to resort to jumping out one of the windows on the upper floors, like so many others did. Yes, they committed suicide.

However to everyone astonishment... WTC7WasPulled survived that fall over 95 floors... Oh my God, he's alive!! -- but he's now brain damaged!!

To quote the grasshopper, Orange Cat... this thread has become :lame: and so very boring :sleep:
 
have another question, which may seem obvious bhuuut .....

Let's say WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.

Why?

The building was empty, and had it not collapsed of its own free will, it probably would have been demolished anyway, but if there is a conspiracy, there needs to be a reason.

And I don't see why anyone would conspire to secretly demolish an empty building in broad daylight, when given the massive hole in it, and the ominous creaking sounds, and the fact all firefighters were drawn back because of the risk of collapse, it was coming down one way or another.

Where's the motive? The Shadow Government secretly and deliberately felled an empty building to ......

Cover up evidece in the Secret Service, CIA or IRS offices there. Well, if it was a conspiracy, surely all that would have been removed before, since foreknowledge is at the heart of the conspiracy.

Or else, these cunning and devious conspirators decided to use the worst way possible to cover up secret files by blowing those Top Secret Documents half across Manhattan and just hoping none of them would survive the blast or be forced out by the pressure wave.

OK, maybe the collapse of the building was because of all the thermite packed in accidently being set off through fires or some other witchcraft. Well, then, it's not controlled, is it?

See, I've had the misfortune of reading the copious ramblings on many conspiracy sites and I've yet to find any of them that really address the why. There has to be a why or there's no reason at all to do it.

Nobody should have to lay out some conspiracy indubitably incorrect in most of its particulars. Someone tells you an obviously 12-year-old Chinese gymnast isn't the 16 she's touted as being and you ask "Why would they do that?" "How did they forge the passport?"
 
You just made my point for me, you doofus, and without even answering the question I asked, so well done on a double FAIL.

If she is obviously 12, then yes, it's perfectly reasonable to ask 'why' given that it's obvious they would be caught. The whole idea of a conspiracy is NOT to get caught doing something secret so that people think it's something other than it is.

How about you go to a few classes, read a few books, think a little, and then come back and play with the big boys when you can actually make the weight?

The point was that that building obviously did not fall due to a fire or debris hitting it, you moron. It's not obvious that anyone would get caught for anything.
 
have another question, which may seem obvious bhuuut .....

Let's say WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.

Why?

The building was empty, and had it not collapsed of its own free will, it probably would have been demolished anyway, but if there is a conspiracy, there needs to be a reason.

And I don't see why anyone would conspire to secretly demolish an empty building in broad daylight, when given the massive hole in it, and the ominous creaking sounds, and the fact all firefighters were drawn back because of the risk of collapse, it was coming down one way or another.

Where's the motive? The Shadow Government secretly and deliberately felled an empty building to ......

Cover up evidece in the Secret Service, CIA or IRS offices there. Well, if it was a conspiracy, surely all that would have been removed before, since foreknowledge is at the heart of the conspiracy.

Or else, these cunning and devious conspirators decided to use the worst way possible to cover up secret files by blowing those Top Secret Documents half across Manhattan and just hoping none of them would survive the blast or be forced out by the pressure wave.

OK, maybe the collapse of the building was because of all the thermite packed in accidently being set off through fires or some other witchcraft. Well, then, it's not controlled, is it?

See, I've had the misfortune of reading the copious ramblings on many conspiracy sites and I've yet to find any of them that really address the why. There has to be a why or there's no reason at all to do it.

There are differing opinions on why it was demolished. One train of thought was that Flight 93 was intended to actually hit Building 7, and since the Building 7 was already rigged for demolition, they had to bring it down. Also even if Flight 93 was meant for another target, 7 was the biggest spook building in New York housing CIA, FBI and many other agencies and was used as the planning command center for the demolitions.

As Barry Jennings said when he got to Guiliani's bunker there were half eaten sandwiches and steaming coffee still left on the tables so those people booked out of there just as the operation began.

 

TheOrangeCat

AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
The point was that that building obviously did not fall due to a fire or debris hitting it, you moron. It's not obvious that anyone would get caught for anything.

You still haven't answered the question. Jeez, what is it with you tin hatters?

The question is WHY? Why would anyone secretly demolish an empty building?

Try answering that, and maybe - maybe - people will stop thinking that .....



http://www.funnyforumpics.com/forums/You-Are/1/normal_You-Are-Full_of_Shit_(Toilet).jpg]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You still haven't answered the question. Jeez, what is it with you tin hatters?

The question is WHY? Why would anyone secretly demolish an empty building?

Try answering that, and maybe - maybe - people will stop thinking that .....

I've already answered this. Since it was already rigged they couldn't leave it standing. Building 7 also had multiple reasons for demolishing it. There were the Enron records for one.

Large numbers of case files for ongoing investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) were reportedly destroyed in the collapse. The Los Angeles Times reported that "substantial files were destroyed" for 3000 to 4000 of the SEC's cases. The EEOC reported that documents for 45 active cases were destroyed. 3 Before the attack, SEC investigations of corporate fraud by companies such as Enron and Worldcom were the subject of many news reports -- reports that virtually vanished in the wake of the attack.
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON
I believe 911 was a republican/corporate false flag op.
All the proof has been destroyed or classified, so we will never know the facts.
911 was like Christmas for the the republicans and their corporate masters, it was a means to do everything they wanted.
They had been planning to invade iraq for a decade, 911 gave them a false excuse to do it, what a fortunate coincidence for them.
Iraq was a corporate war funded by taxpayers, made alot of corporations very rich, and cost the lives of thousands of American and countless Iraqi people.
Governments, especially the Bush republicans of 2000~2008, are the most corrupt organized crime syndicates, because they are controlled by ahole corporations who care more about 1% profit than countless peoples lives. :(
 
I believe 911 was a republican/corporate false flag op.
All the proof has been destroyed or classified, so we will never know the facts.
911 was like Christmas for the the republicans and their corporate masters, it was a means to do everything they wanted.
They had been planning to invade iraq for a decade, 911 gave them a false excuse to do it, what a fortunate coincidence for them.
Iraq was a corporate war funded by taxpayers, made alot of corporations very rich, and cost the lives of thousands of American and countless Iraqi people.
Governments, especially the Bush republicans of 2000~2008, are the most corrupt organized crime syndicates, because they are controlled by ahole corporations who care more about 1% profit than countless peoples lives. :(

There is plenty of evidence but most of the steel was destroyed immediately from the World Trade Center. I wouldn't call it a "Republican" operation. It certainly involved Republicans like Cheney but he is only a Republican in name. He is an elite operative more than a Republican. Both parties are complicit in the crimes of 9/11. If Obama was a good guy he'd immediately commission a new investigation.

But the amount of evidence is off the charts showing 9/11 to be an inside job. Thanks for reminding me of the fact that there were troops mounted at the border ready to invade Afghanistan well before 9/11 and Bush signed the order to invade Afghanistan weeks before 9/11.

Just another fact to add to the mountain of evidence.
 
Check out what happens when you spell illuminati backwards and put it in your address bar, how could the govt be so careless

ie www.itanimulli.com :tinhat:
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Ok time to step in, do you honestly think that the useless flaming will make the debate more interesting or more clever? As far as I know most of you are adults and not teenagers, so please act like adults and try to debate courteously because otherwise I will be forced to punish the flame starters and close that thread. Thanks for your understanding
 
The only thing I would say is : at the time of the 9/11 attack the FBI were about to devote considerable manpower to mortgage and subprime fraud -- which they were in the process of investigating. Needless to say, after 9/11 this investigation went by the wayside. We all know what happened to the world economy in 2008...
 
Ok time to step in, do you honestly think that the useless flaming will make the debate more interesting or more clever? As far as I know most of you are adults and not teenagers, so please act like adults and try to debate courteously because otherwise I will be forced to punish the flame starters and close that thread. Thanks for your understanding
Yeah, act like adults & colour your font red & in bold! :rolleyes:
 
Top