Comments about Bush re-elected.

[Brino]

Very interesting links. Interesting to read them. But I am staying to my opinion.

I knew you would that's why I wasn't posting them for you.

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

Hmmmmm, really:

http://www.factcheck.org/article147.html
http://www.factcheck.org/article252.html
http://www.factcheck.org/article177.html

Yep, and I trust that site as much as I do the National Enquirer.

At some point, will you please acknowledge that along with the "evil" right leaning Fox News, there are just as many, if not far more left leaning news/media outlets along with web sites that have a clear agenda and don't care how much they twist or omit the truth and facts?

 

[georges]

I knew you would that's why I wasn't posting them for you.

I already guessed that this would be your answer.

 

[Brino]

Yep, and I trust that site as much as I do the National Enquirer.

At some point, will you please acknowledge that along with the "evil" right leaning Fox News, there are just as many, if not far more left leaning news/media outlets along with web sites that have a clear agenda and don't care how much they twist or omit the truth and facts?

God you are an idiot!

If you actually even bothered to look at the site you would clearly see that it is unbiased. Plus, the sources that they use are from the government. Plus, you're talking about the same fucking site that Cheney recommended in his debate. But of course you are a good little sheep so you don't trust anything that portrays Bush in a bad light. Keep counting sheep DS.

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

God you are an idiot!

Hello again Mr. Pot.

If you actually even bothered to look at the site you would clearly see that it is unbiased.

Why, every single piece of waste of time crap you post is biased. You wouldn't post it if it didn't. You have the IQ of a coffee mug and can barely get through a day without showing your utter incompetence and stupidity.

Plus, the sources that they use are from the government.

Plenty of sources those of us who support Bush have posted have been from the Government, and yet you haven't to accept them.

It's the Moore-ons way of doing things. Post something that is true, just edit and cut out key pieces of evidence to suit your side.

Plus, you're talking about the same fucking site that Cheney recommended in his debate.

Oh, so NOW you want to put stock in what Cheney say’s!!! Why is it Cheney is a liar and a cheat in your eyes right up until it suits your cause? Then, of course, you flip flop.

But of course you are a good little sheep so you don't trust anything that portrays Bush in a bad light.

Sheep?!??! Funniest thing yet kiddo. Keep believing the liberal media and how the election was rigged. Keep thinking the exit polls you saw were what the people thought. Keep believing the left and don't for once think for yourself. Yeah, I'm the sheep. Laughable.

Keep counting sheep DS.

Come on over, and I'll teach you how to count past 10, jagoff.

 

[Brino]

Hello again Mr. Pot.



Why, every single piece of waste of time crap you post is biased. You wouldn't post it if it didn't. You have the IQ of a coffee mug and can barely get through a day without showing your utter incompetence and stupidity.



Plenty of sources those of us who support Bush have posted have been from the Government, and yet you haven't to accept them.

It's the Moore-ons way of doing things. Post something that is true, just edit and cut out key pieces of evidence to suit your side.



Oh, so NOW you want to put stock in what Cheney say’s!!! Why is it Cheney is a liar and a cheat in your eyes right up until it suits your cause? Then, of course, you flip flop.



Sheep?!??! Funniest thing yet kiddo. Keep believing the liberal media and how the election was rigged. Keep thinking the exit polls you saw were what the people thought. Keep believing the left and don't for once think for yourself. Yeah, I'm the sheep. Laughable.

God you love using that quote function don't ya!?

How come every single thing that portrays Bush in a bad light is biased? How come everything that portrays the democrats in a bad light is true? Sheep!

btw I think the better question would be how come you don't trust a site Cheney recommended?

Come on over, and I'll teach you how to count past 10, jagoff.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Shove it!

 

[geezer]

This thread is great entertainment ... heh

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

God you love using that quote function don't ya!?

Pretty much seperates the men from the boys sporto.

How come every single thing that portrays Bush in a bad light is biased? How come everything that portrays the democrats in a bad light is true? Sheep!

When have I ever said that? And again, how is that any different from what you do? Something says Bush is bad, you believe it. Something say's Kerry is bad, it's nothing but lies.

How about next time you start commenting on others, you take a hard look in the mirror.

btw I think the better question would be how come you don't trust a site Cheney recommended?

I'll ignore the fact that once again you failed to answer my question, and tell you that because I don't follow blindly, I do question everything on the web today. Just because Cheney recommended it a few months ago, doesn't mean it has stayed netural to this point. And like I said, if it was fair and balanced, you wouldn't be posting it.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Shove it!

Come on Brino, we all know you were helped out on that.

 

[georges]

Pretty much seperates the men from the boys sporto.



When have I ever said that? And again, how is that any different from what you do? Something says Bush is bad, you believe it. Something say's Kerry is bad, it's nothing but lies.

How about next time you start commenting on others, you take a hard look in the mirror.



I'll ignore the fact that once again you failed to answer my question, and tell you that because I don't follow blindly, I do question everything on the web today. Just because Cheney recommended it a few months ago, doesn't mean it has stayed netural to this point. And like I said, if it was fair and balanced, you wouldn't be posting it.



Come on Brino, we all know you were helped out on that.

great post :hatsoff: :thumbsup:

 

[Brino]

Pretty much seperates the men from the boys sporto.

Yes it does!

When have I ever said that? And again, how is that any different from what you do? Something says Bush is bad, you believe it. Something say's Kerry is bad, it's nothing but lies.

How about next time you start commenting on others, you take a hard look in the mirror.

Nope, Ive admitted on several occasions that Kerry/Moore/Clinton have made mistakes in the past. You just have a hearing impairment.

I'll ignore the fact that once again you failed to answer my question, and tell you that because I don't follow blindly, I do question everything on the web today. Just because Cheney recommended it a few months ago, doesn't mean it has stayed netural to this point. And like I said, if it was fair and balanced, you wouldn't be posting it.

You don't follow blindly!? You question everything on the web!? That doesn't seem likely to me since everything you post comes from two bit hacks who are obviously biased.

Come on Brino, we all know you were helped out on that.

Keep telling yourself that, it must make you feel better on those lonely nights in the junkyard.

 

[Brino]

:angels:

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

:angels:

 

[Famousbabes]

Hey look more name calling and flaming.
The 2 people above me need to take there flaming and name calling to pm's or email. There are some people in this thread that are in a discussion and are giving thier opinions, they aren't flaming.

Please guys, it's to the point we are handing out warnings to chill out now. Temp banning can be a done if some, (not talking just to the 2 guys that posted above me.) people can't stop flaming each other.

I'm real sick of getting emails and pm's about those people. Help me out here.

 

[member5726]

Hey look more name calling and flaming.
The 2 people above me need to take there flaming and name calling to pm's or email. There are some people in this thread that are in a discussion and are giving thier opinions, they aren't flaming.

Please guys, it's to the point we are handing out warnings to chill out now. Temp banning can be a done if some, (not talking just to the 2 guys that posted above me.) people can't stop flaming each other.

I'm real sick of getting emails and pm's about those people. Help me out here.

Thanks FB, i'm getting really tired of this stuff also.
Keep up the good work ! :thumbsup:

 

[georges]

Hey look more name calling and flaming.
The 2 people above me need to take there flaming and name calling to pm's or email. There are some people in this thread that are in a discussion and are giving thier opinions, they aren't flaming.

Please guys, it's to the point we are handing out warnings to chill out now. Temp banning can be a done if some, (not talking just to the 2 guys that posted above me.) people can't stop flaming each other.

I'm real sick of getting emails and pm's about those people. Help me out here.

THere is a solution. Tell people to deal with their new president. But for some people it is more than too much asked.

 

[dirtydawg]

I think stuff here is obviously out of hand amd neither side is goign to suddenly come forward and say " hey, im wrong, u know what, ur points make sense and i think u've convinced me". however, georges i disagree with your stance that people should just accept their new president. This might not be the best place to discuss, but it's not the worst either.
But read up on any famously positive leader, such as martin luther king: " Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". If someone believes that president bush is immoral, or a bad leader, they have every right to try and bring their evidence regarding that to light. This doesn't automatically make what they're saying right, but they are doing the right thing by trying to do what they blelieve is best and achieve change in a peaceful and agreeable manner.

 

[member5726]

I think stuff here is obviously out of hand amd neither side is goign to suddenly come forward and say " hey, im wrong, u know what, ur points make sense and i think u've convinced me". however, georges i disagree with your stance that people should just accept their new president. This might not be the best place to discuss, but it's not the worst either.
But read up on any famously positive leader, such as martin luther king: " Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". If someone believes that president bush is immoral, or a bad leader, they have every right to try and bring their evidence regarding that to light. This doesn't automatically make what they're saying right, but they are doing the right thing by trying to do what they blelieve is best and achieve change in a peaceful and agreeable manner.

Amen to that ! :thumbsup:

 

[Brino]

Thanks FB, i'm getting really tired of this stuff also.
Keep up the good work ! :thumbsup:

Oh, come on now Dan! I thought you'd have my back!

 

[Sexxy]

You don't know anything about Bush. Are you a republican? I said Let us see what happens in 4 more years with Bush!

nothing. In america the president doesnt have absolute power. Dunno if u knew that?
Anyways this is a porn forum cheer up!

 

[member5726]

Oh, come on now Dan! I thought you'd have my back!

Well we lost the election, so from now on, you're on your own !! :1orglaugh