There you go lumping people into one category. Just because the police let you get butt fucked in a holding cell doesn't mean it was their fault. It was yours for being a dumb fuck. Whenever I've dealt with small children while wearing my uni, invariably there will be some dumbass mother who'll say something stupid like, "If you do something wrong, these are the guys who will come and get you." And I'll go out of my way to say something like, "Lady, are you really that stupid? Teach your kid to run to someone with a badge when there's a problem. Otherwise, you're just teaching them to be afraid of the wrong people." Some people get it and re-think their perspective. Personally, I blame your mother for raising a stupid kid who never learned.
life is not a movie, it's not because you watched 'scream' than tomorrow you dressed a mask go to street and killing people.Excuse me but if you looked @ the the last movie I watched
My only problem was how the cops arrested him since he didn't used any violence. If he did then yeah I can see the police having to go to extreme measure but he didn't go to extreme measure and yet they (Police) still went as far which was unnecessary.
I don't know about cops in the US but here in the UK, when restraining a potentially violent suspect, they use as many men as possible. This minimises the risk of injury to both the police and the suspect. It may look brutal but there is far less chance of anyone getting hurt if there are more police involved in the restraint. Remember, in this case, the man that they were arresting is well known to be violent, has been in prison for assault and is being arrested for brutally beating a woman to within an inch of her life. Do the think that the police should wait until the man lashes out before restraining him, or minimise the risk to everyone by going in strong and ensuring that he is unable to cause anyone injury?
He didn't lash out. He didn't even put up a fight so there was no need for the police to do that. Just arrest him normally.
My point is that he couldn't lash out as he had been restrained. If you just arrest him "normally", what it to stop him from lashing out and hurting someone. The chances of him then being hurt in return are also heightened. He is a known violent man trained as a fighter, so you do not take the chance. He had been called out to the hotel because of attacking someone else
, so there was no way of knowing what would do.
"Hotel guest Mary Casamento called police after allegedly watching a “big dude” yelling and pushing another woman, according to KTLA. The woman was reportedly attempting to calm him down and he “grabbed her by the hair,” Mary said."
Doesn't make a difference. He did not show any type of violence when the cops arrived. There was no need for the police to do that. Just because he is viewed as violent that does not mean he is going to attack every person he sees in public.
Doesn't make a difference. He did not show any type of violence when the cops arrived. There was no need for the police to do that. Just because he is viewed as violent that does not mean he is going to attack every person he sees in public.
I will say this again.
He showed no sign of violence because he was not given the chance to do so.
He is a violent person and could snap at any time. The way that the police acted was right and proper in ensuring that everyone involved was kept safe from this VIOLENT and DANGEROUS person.
Oh, and by the way, were you a witness to his arrest?
One witness statement says that he was tased after a gun was spotted. It does not sound like he came out with his hands up!
So, what are your views on jails and prisons, bars and fences or no bars and fences?
So, what are your views on jails and prisons, bars and fences or no bars and fences?
Also how do you know he could snap anytime? Just because he is an mma fighter?.
It would be nice if we lived in a world where there were no jails or prisons period. There are a lot of ppl in prison right now who do not deserve to be facing time or death.
He is not a monster.
Deepcover said:He is not a monster.
He's reminding of this woman I knew way back in my first message board ever many years ago. She was always very contradictive no matter the topic. Well, she finally one day admitted to me via e-mail that she actually more often than not took the opposing stance on a topic on purpose vs. what the majority of the people on the board were taking ... just to stir up controversy because she loved debating. Yep, she more often than not didn't necessarily believe what she was saying. She just loved to debate so she purposely stirred up shit.RASQ said:Has anybody nominated this dipshit for asshat of the week???
Warmachine has a history of assault! This isn't his first rodeo! What is it going to take for you to realize that this shit bird belongs in prison now? He has ruined his privileges to walk among the free!