PirateKing
█▀█▀█ █ █
The front lines are not what they traditionally are anymore.
I agree. The front line is everywhere and theres no shelter in sight.
The front lines are not what they traditionally are anymore.
Oh, I am all for torture. They have no rules yet we must abide by them to show that we are 'better' than them? If torturing 30 terrorists saves one innocent life, I am all for that. When fighting against religious loonies (who have been taught that this life sucks and the next life is better so its okay strap explosives to yourself and kill innocents) you have to take extreme measures as well. They don't understand diplomacy.
What people like you don't understand is that if we allow ourselves to become just as bad as the most evil people out there and use evil to fight evil, we don't destroy them, WE DESTROY OURSELVES. If we throw away all our most deeply held principles when they get in the way of effectiveness or convenience, if we end up becoming as bad as our enemies just what the hell are we fighting for then? I don't want to live in that kind of world and I'm not going to fight for it to stay that way. I demand better. If it comes to that, and we sink to their level, we have already lost and more than just a material way. You can't fight evil with evil and have something good come out of it. It will always lead to more misery and even more evil.
What people like you don't understand is that if we allow ourselves to become just as bad as the most evil people out there and use evil to fight evil, we don't destroy them, WE DESTROY OURSELVES. If we throw away all our most deeply held principles when they get in the way of effectiveness or convenience, if we end up becoming as bad as our enemies just what the hell are we fighting for then? I don't want to live in that kind of world and I'm not going to fight for it to stay that way. I demand better. If it comes to that, and we sink to their level, we have already lost and more than just a material way. You can't fight evil with evil and have something good come out of it. It will always lead to more misery and even more evil.
Oh, I am all for torture. They have no rules yet we must abide by them to show that we are 'better' than them? If torturing 30 terrorists saves one innocent life, I am all for that. When fighting against religious loonies (who have been taught that this life sucks and the next life is better so its okay strap explosives to yourself and kill innocents) you have to take extreme measures as well. They don't understand diplomacy.
Thank you D-rock:thumbsup: We cant compromise our principles just because the enemy shows no mercy. If we keep compromising and dont enforce a standard then eventually the country becomes a monster itself. We need to establish a clear message that we are unwavering and honorable.
I do not see how we "destroy ourselves". The American public is not committing these attacks directly, they have no effect on our daily lives. Politicians sanction these events. Sounds crass but it is the truth. We have soldiers (nobody forces them to enlist and they know what they are getting into) to do this for us. We have crazies that will stop at nothing short of the complete destruction of all those who oppose them. We won't have to worry about "destroying ourselves", they would gladly do that for us if we don't fight back.
I am a very left-leaning liberal but I side with the right on this one. How can you fight those who place no value on their own lives much less on yours and mine? You can argue that maybe torture is ineffective in that the enemy will say whatever, not necessarily the truth, to make it stop but I won't concede that it is not necessary.
Lets say its as clear-cut as you say. We either become a monster or we get killed off by the crazies. Choose your poison. I'd rather live...
If we turn our backs and pretend to be ignorant then are we really not destroying ourselves? The german people chose to ignore the fact that the jewish people were being rounded up by the nazi party and executed. The people cant just turn a blind eye to its governments actions.
I'm not saying we should drop nukes or round up all the muslims and commit genocide. Round up the terrorists/criminals and do what it takes to save innocents lives.
5 November, 2004
Camp Abu Ghraib
RCT-1, CO Col. Michael Shupp
The Col, called the entire Thundering Third into the courtyard, where he addressed us, he clairfied the ROEs and said
"When you go into a fight, you fight for each other. You firght for your fellow Marines. Those are the things that really matter. You have the right to protect yourself. Take the fight to the enemy, but fight with firmness, dignity, and respect. You are warriors not criminals."
You see Jason, when we act like our enemies we become criminals just like them and we are better than that.
Also to the point, CIA operatives, SEALS, Marines, etc. getting prosecuted for their treatment of these terrorists (read: animals) is outright apalling. How the Constitution can protect a terrorist who lives in another country and affords them the same rights as a common criminal in the U.S. escapes me...
I do not see how we "destroy ourselves". The American public is not committing these attacks directly, they have no effect on our daily lives. Politicians sanction these events. Sounds crass but it is the truth. We have soldiers (nobody forces them to enlist and they know what they are getting into) to do this for us. We have crazies that will stop at nothing short of the complete destruction of all those who oppose them. We won't have to worry about "destroying ourselves", they would gladly do that for us if we don't fight back.
I am a very left-leaning liberal but I side with the right on this one. How can you fight those who place no value on their own lives much less on yours and mine? You can argue that maybe torture is ineffective in that the enemy will say whatever, not necessarily the truth, to make it stop but I won't concede that it is not necessary.
Now that is something that SgtMarine agrees with. But let's not change the subject if we what to have a discussion on that, then we need to start a thread on it. Or search to see if there is already one on it.
Its along the same lines of the conversation we were having and the point I was trying to make. They are criminals/terrorists not American citizens. They are not covered under the Geneva convention much less our Constitution! So different rules should apply. The capture one of ours and commit atrocities (beheadings, drawn and quartings, etc.) makes them subhuman (just the terrorists not muslims as a whole so relax)and they should not get the same protection we get. If they did this just to our soldiers and operatives, its still fucked up but war is war; doing it to contracted labor and journalists is something else...(e.g. Daniel Pearl)
Its along the same lines of the conversation we were having and the point I was trying to make. They are criminals/terrorists not American citizens. They are not covered under the Geneva convention much less our Constitution! So different rules should apply. The capture one of ours and commit atrocities (beheadings, drawn and quartings, etc.) makes them subhuman (just the terrorists not muslims as a whole so relax)and they should not get the same protection we get. If they did this just to our soldiers and operatives, its still fucked up but war is war; doing it to contracted labor and journalists is something else...(e.g. Daniel Pearl)
unlawful combatants or unprivileged combatant/belligerent is a civilian who directly engages in armed conflict in violation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and may be detained or prosecuted under the domestic law of the detaining state for such action
the thing is that we also tortured people that turned out were not connected to Al Quada at all. anyways you could bring up all of the twisted barbaric shit that Al Queda has done to our soldiers and civilians it doesnt change the notion that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. Martin Luther king said that:thumbsup:
....or was it ghandi?:dunno:
You have no idea what Blackwater and other PMC are all about. I can assure you they are not just "delivering catering supplies" like the media shows. Your right they are not covered under the Geneva Convention because they are
They are not part of a traditional military force, different rules apply.
We need a pornstar in on this debate that would spice things up.