bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Red, you're talking to someone that thinks airplanes can't fly above 30k' and people have a diseases because their mother never told them to stop scratching.

Did you ask your question in the accepted format?
 

BlkHawk

Closed Account
Can YOU read, the lithium dispersal which prompted the chemtrail interview with Dr. Rowland was done on June 24th 2013 by the Terrier-Improved Orion Rocket.

"A two-stage Terrier-Improved Orion blasts off just 15 seconds later. The 33 foot long rocket carries a canister of lithium gas. It will shoot out a long trail of lithium gas that creates a chemical trail that will be tracked to determine how the upper atmospheric wind varies with altitude. These winds are believed to be the drivers of the dynamo currents…"

http://www.universetoday.com/103087...lobal-ionospheric-communications-disruptions/


The importance of Dr. Rowlands testimony is in substantiating the existence of chemtrails at all, which, as you can see some fools are still denying even exists. He isn't even talking about the covert operations such as P112 where harmful chemical and bacterial agents were dispersed on purpose for experimental purposes onto troops and civilian populations. Besides Rowland says that NASA chemtrail spraying has been done in the 2000's…last time I checked we are in the 2000's.

So chemtrail spraying is definitively confirmed in the 50's the 60's the 70's 90 and 2000's, and as recently as June 24th 2013. And I have plenty of other testimony, such as the Belfort Group, substantiating it is being done continuously today and everyday. I have listed at least 4 different programs currently doing the spraying. And I have several other sources confirming that constant spraying of the military variety, i.e, chemical and bacterial agents, is being done constantly via (DAARPA) along with the Aluminum and Barium being dispersed in HAARP.

So, the existence of chemtrails is substantiated without a doubt. If they will spray troops with chemicals, why wouldn't they spray you ? And if it took 35 years for the military to admit programs like Project 112, what would make you think that they aren't doing the same thing now, and just not telling you ?

As for the interplanetary dust thing, I assume you're joking unless you provide some references indicating otherwise.

From NASA

On Aug.11 and 12, 2013, the annual Perseid meteor shower will peak, filling the sky with streaks of light, commonly known as shooting stars. Such visually stunning showers are actually but the tip of the iceberg when it comes to meteoroids slamming into Earth's atmosphere: Some 10 to 40 tons of material of invisible meteoric dust enters the atmosphere from interplanetary space every day.

...

"This is interplanetary dust," said Diego Janches, who studies micrometeoroids at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "The fragments are either remnants from the solar system's formation, or they are produced by collisions between asteroids or comets from long ago."

Full Article:
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/heliophysics-nugget-mapping-tons-of-meteoric-dust-in-the-sky/

upper atmosphere

Definitions
noun

(meteorology) that part of the atmosphere above the troposphere

Source:
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/upper-atmosphere

The scientist you are quoting is talking about releasing lithium gas in the upper atmosphere to track wind currents. One of your conspiracy fellows emailed NASA about chemtrails and got a response about lithium spraying used in this testing they also discuss meteor ablation:

http://www.thetruthdenied.com/news/...bout-chemtrails-here-is-what-nasa-wrote-back/

The total amount of lithium that was released in space during the Dynamo Mission was 750 grams (or 1.65 pounds).* The estimates of the daily meteoric metal deposition rates in the upper atmosphere range from approximately 40 to 200 tons per day.* The peak deposition of the meteoric material occurs in the 80-110 km (50-70 miles) altitude range where most meteors ablate.* The lithium metal released by the Dynamo mission was therefore a miniscule fraction of the metals deposited in that altitude range on a daily basis by meteor ablation.*

If that didn't sink in, read it again and think about it.

Saying that 1.65 pounds of Lithium being released into the upper atmosphere is poisoning us is absurd. It is like saying one child peeing in a lake used for drinking water will harm everyone who gets their water from that lake.

Even if NASA launched a rocket every day since the 1970's and released 1.65 pounds of chemicals into the upper atmosphere every single day, it still wouldn't have any effect on us.

Again he is discussing the upper atmosphere, as in above the troposphere, and he isn't revealing anything secret, or in your words "nefarious", this information has been published in newspapers since the late 1960's.
 

Red XXX

Official Checked Star Member
BlkHawk .... I'm sorry but I think you'll find NASA are not authorative enough for Eric, and as Bobjustbob will tell you they don't reply to questions in the accepted format?

And as for Dr. Rowland I just hope he's a friend of David Icke :jester:
 

Philbert

Banned
Well, since posters are staying in droves, at least you have revealed to all of us the fact we got some smart-asses (literally) on this site.
Damn, even I can see the reality of "Chemtrails", and it's right there with the Kennedy Conspiracy, the 911 conspiracy, and the Yeti and Sasquatch (they both like laughing at Eric, but it's a secret. Like those metallic life forms...).
Funny how this secret conspiracy is not known by millions of directly effected folks, but Eric has ALL the inside info from years and years.
I really mean "funny" as in hilarious...thanks to one and all.
And please control your dog, Ace Boobtoucher...we have leash laws in this country!
 

Philbert

Banned
nobody likes you... you are insignifigant to this board, nobody gives a fuck what thread you create, and nobody is going to make any concessions for you whatsoever.
This thread will never die, I designed it to go on forever, along with my other threads in this section, so they will be here and if you don't like it then leave.

eric2136
Posts:1,674
Rep Power:163
(newbies with 20 posts have more reputation points than eric...):rofl2:

Ace Boobtoucher
Posts:13,019
Rep Power:436288


Whoops!
Another theory of eric's shot to hell...
Eric...nobody likes you... you are insignificant to this board, nobody gives a fuck what thread you like, and nobody is going to make any concessions for you whatsoever.
This thread will never die, it's designed it to go on forever, 'cause everyone needs to feel superior to someone; so they (eric's threads) will be here; and if you need to laugh, mock some really lame douchebag, or just feel better about yourself...eric is there for you.
Rarely have I seen such a disparate collection of FOs posters all agree on something so completely...eric, you are a TOTAL fail as a person.
But thanks for all the fun!:)
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
As am I.

Conspiracy theorists display incredible attention to detail, an even more incredible ability to ignore details they don't like, obsessive focus and a complete absence of social skills. Conspiracy theorists divide the world into "Everyone even remotely involved/qualified vs. Me," and decide that they'll win single-handedly. They're like Rambo with bullshit instead of bullets.


The average conspiracy theorist will argue with NASA, Nobel-prize winners and every expert in the world despite having fewer qualifications than the average fry cook.
Conspiracy theorists view logical argument as cheating.
Like pissing fetishes and tentacle rape comics, conspiracy theories are a problem made much worse by the Internet.
Never assume malice when incompetence will do.


Read more: http://www.cracked.com/funny-44-conspiracy-theories/#ixzz2sZXYl7Pi
 

BlkHawk

Closed Account
BlkHawk .... I'm sorry but I think you'll find NASA are not authorative enough for Eric, and as Bobjustbob will tell you they don't reply to questions in the accepted format?

And as for Dr. Rowland I just hope he's a friend of David Icke :jester:

If you are curious about Dr Rowland you can search him, you will have to skip the conspiracy sites for the actual story. In a nutshell it goes like this:

A chemtrail conspiracy theorist named Sue got through to him on the phone, and recorded the conversation. She was asking him about the rocket launch mentioned in the paper, and the use of lithium in upper atmosphere tests, also mentioned in the paper. He explained what it was being used for and referred to it as a chemtrail from the rocket, which is true, the rocket left a chemical trail in the upper atmosphere.

She released the audio recording online, and every chemtrail theorist on earth latched on to it and said "A ha, NASA scientist admits chemtrail conspiracy!". All of them leaving out that he was discussing a 1.65 pound payload released in the upper atmosphere. A payload so super secret that Sue, the instigator, had to go to the great length of reading her daily paper to discover this "nefarious plot".

Eric and others always leave that part of the information out when quoting this poor man's "testimony". I kind of of feel bad for Dr. Rowland, as I am sure his fellow NASA employees had a good laugh at his being caught in a word game.

Here is the audio clip she released, only a few minutes of a larger conversation, and she doesn't have the decency to say she is recording him:


When Eric is saying he has the testimony of a NASA heliophysistist, as part of his 100% rock solid evidence, that is the "testimony" he is referring to. It is nothing like Eric makes it out to be, and is nothing even close to what he fervently hopes it to be.

Feel free to listen to it, it makes Eric's posting look even worse.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
So Blk Hawk is saying that the tinfoil hat wearing troll conspiracy theorists take innocuous bits and pieces of information from any source they can find and twist it to their own end. Wow, Eric is like an arrogant dickhead MacGyver then.
 

Red XXX

Official Checked Star Member
If you are curious about Dr Rowland you can search him, you will have to skip the conspiracy sites for the actual story. In a nutshell it goes like this:

A chemtrail conspiracy theorist named Sue got through to him on the phone, and recorded the conversation. She was asking him about the rocket launch mentioned in the paper, and the use of lithium in upper atmosphere tests, also mentioned in the paper. He explained what it was being used for and referred to it as a chemtrail from the rocket, which is true, the rocket left a chemical trail in the upper atmosphere.

She released the audio recording online, and every chemtrail theorist on earth latched on to it and said "A ha, NASA scientist admits chemtrail conspiracy!". All of them leaving out that he was discussing a 1.65 pound payload released in the upper atmosphere. A payload so super secret that Sue, the instigator, had to go to the great length of reading her daily paper to discover this "nefarious plot".

Eric and others always leave that part of the information out when quoting this poor man's "testimony". I kind of of feel bad for Dr. Rowland, as I am sure his fellow NASA employees had a good laugh at his being caught in a word game.

Here is the audio clip she released, only a few minutes of a larger conversation, and she doesn't have the decency to say she is recording him:


When Eric is saying he has the testimony of a NASA heliophysistist, as part of his 100% rock solid evidence, that is the "testimony" he is referring to. It is nothing like Eric makes it out to be, and is nothing even close to what he fervently hopes it to be.

Feel free to listen to it, it makes Eric's posting look even worse.
Oh ..... that Dc Rowland (Douglas E Rowland) sorry my fault!

Don't tell Eric but I really haven't read properly a single one of his post - life's far to short, I didn't think NASA was that daft to employ a complete nutter, but then again the UKs late great Sir Patrick Moore apparently checked NASA computer calculations for the Apollo missions with a note pad and pen for them, and then sent them to NASA with drawings of the Spodies included!

spodies-clouds.jpg
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I would like to remind everyone to rate this thread (and all of eric's other threads) terrible so it gets the rating it truly deserves, instead of the false high rating it had when from where eric rated it himself.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
The first picture shows simple engine exhaust condensation, note that the clouds line up perfectly with the engines of each plane. It's no more dangerous than car exhaust, unless you walk straight into the exhaust stream. The second photo depicts contrails due to change in pressure. If you look at the front of the wing, you'll notice the jet's leading edge flaps are down, effectively changing the shape of the wing. This can also occur during aircraft maneuvering. Here's the same phenomenon on a few different planes:
4811974049_40b257c6eb_o.jpg

2444469258_984011a552_z.jpg

0222contrails500.jpg

F-18-With-Contrails.jpg%3Fv%3D1286991540

B-17s-showing-prop.-and-exhaust-contrails.jpg

contrail.jpg

aerosim_web_image_-_flying_plane_contrails_358170022.jpg%3Fw%3D700

photo%252B1.jpg

Exactly right. These are 2 different types of contrails. The contrails that occur from the edges of control surfaces (wings, flaps, etc) are caused by vortices that are formed as a result of the airfoil generating lift, often referred to as "wake turbulence". When the temperature of the air inside the vortex drops below the dew point, water vapor forms and a resulting contrail is observed. You'll most frequently see these associated with airliners on humid days either at takeoff and the initial climb-out or just prior to touchdown on landing. You'll also frequently see them occur with fighter planes during aerobatic maneuvers.

Here's a perfect example of a 777 leaving a serious contrail off the outside trailing edge of the flaps during landing on a foggy day in Birmingham, UK.:

 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
No I didn't ..... do I get a spanking :naughtynaughty:

You really deserve to be turned over my knee and have your milky white bottom paddled till it turns to the shade of your hair. But then again, I would have to fly over there. Can I book a flight and request no contrails? You know, like asking for a kosher meal.

Funny how the government never kept it's spraying to the night so no one could see it.
 
Nothing new….ehhh the usual suspect of lidiot losers, everything which I said here was 100 % correct. chemtrails is 100% substantiated. Along with everything else which I have ever said, or will ever say regarding this topic. Red Beans interplanetary dust bullshit is irrelevant, and her blatantly idiotic erroneous statement regarding lithium dispersal just confirms my initial thoughts regarding her overall intelligence.

You moron simpleton pornboard clowns can amuse yourself telling each other simpleton lies and groveling for your cartoon rep points and the such…and I'll just continue to sit back and watch this fairly entertaining little peasant minstrel show…loll

And for any of you peanut-brain trolls who still are dumb enough to think you have some chance in actually saying something intelligent…Please feel free to…

Try Again !

Can YOU read, the lithium dispersal which prompted the chemtrail interview with Dr. Rowland was done on June 24th 2013 by the Terrier-Improved Orion Rocket.

"A two-stage Terrier-Improved Orion blasts off just 15 seconds later. The 33 foot long rocket carries a canister of lithium gas. It will shoot out a long trail of lithium gas that creates a chemical trail that will be tracked to determine how the upper atmospheric wind varies with altitude. These winds are believed to be the drivers of the dynamo currents…"

http://www.universetoday.com/103087...lobal-ionospheric-communications-disruptions/


The importance of Dr. Rowlands testimony is in substantiating the existence of chemtrails at all, which, as you can see some fools are still denying even exists. He isn't even talking about the covert operations such as P112 where harmful chemical and bacterial agents were dispersed on purpose for experimental purposes onto troops and civilian populations. Besides Rowland says that NASA chemtrail spraying has been done in the 2000's…last time I checked we are in the 2000's.

So chemtrail spraying is definitively confirmed in the 50's the 60's the 70's 90 and 2000's, and as recently as June 24th 2013. And I have plenty of other testimony, such as the Belfort Group, substantiating it is being done continuously today and everyday. I have listed at least 4 different programs currently doing the spraying. And I have several other sources confirming that constant spraying of the military variety, i.e, chemical and bacterial agents, is being done constantly via (DAARPA) along with the Aluminum and Barium being dispersed in HAARP.

So, the existence of chemtrails is substantiated without a doubt. If they will spray troops with chemicals, why wouldn't they spray you ? And if it took 35 years for the military to admit programs like Project 112, what would make you think that they aren't doing the same thing now, and just not telling you ?

As for the interplanetary dust thing, I assume you're joking unless you provide some references indicating otherwise.
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Why would someone build a plane that could test the content of chemtrails that can't fly above 30k'?
 
Why would someone build a plane that could test the content of chemtrails that can't fly above 30k'?

50966d1311243432-usually-im-pro-british-people-de-plane-de-plane-demotivational-poster-1232561838.jpg
:1orglaugh

That's it Tattoo Boy !, but I'm not in this one, I'm just watching,,,ask some of your doofus buddies for help, i'm sure they'll say whatever you want them too anyways !

Keep it up :rofl2: !
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Hey guys, the sucktard is back with the same bullshit facts that he can't back up and the balls to dismiss criticism he can't refute.
 
Top