Bannon Out

[sean miguel]

No, your goal is to dehumanize, humiliate, and ridicule, and that's not ok and it's gone on for long enough.

If I may, I believe I have ridiculed and humiliated you on several occasions recently. But there's no hard feelings on my part. I'm willing to laugh it off if you are.

 

[Johan]

First, you never ever Trust Bullshitico.

Secondly, I am going to have to prove you wrong again, which according to doxfire, is a violation of board rules...

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...te-house-departure-im-going-to-war-for-trump/

Ok, so
1) Never trust BSBart
2) He sais he's going to fight Trump's "opponents" but he did not said who these opponents are. Are they the Democrats ? Since Trump attacked Mitch McConnell on Twitter, is he one of the opponents ? Trump has repeatedly criticized Jeff Sessions. Is Sessions among the opponents ? During his time in the administration, Bannon often clashed with Kushner and Kelly. Does he considers them as opponents to Trump ?

I nsay the next weeks are gonna be interesting...

Byt what's sure is that, by saying that "Trump presidency that [they] fought for, and won, is over", he has already lashed out on the all Trump administration, Trump included

 

[Jack Davenport]

Ok, so
1) Never trust BSBart
2) He sais he's going to fight Trump's "opponents" but he did not said who these opponents are. Are they the Democrats ? Since Trump attacked Mitch McConnell on Twitter, is he one of the opponents ? Trump has repeatedly criticized Jeff Sessions. Is Sessions among the opponents ? During his time in the administration, Bannon often clashed with Kushner and Kelly. Does he considers them as opponents to Trump ?

I nsay the next weeks are gonna be interesting...

Byt what's sure is that, by saying that "Trump presidency that [they] fought for, and won, is over", he has already lashed out on the all Trump administration, Trump included

lol Bannon is Breitbart!

His words on his own site are his own.

:1orglaugh :rofl:

 

[xfire]

Oh My God! Bwahahahahahahahaha Yeah, that is what I set out to do. If that is the case, that behavior would carry over to the talk section as I wouldn't distinguish from the two boards. It happens only during political argument. Learn how to defend your positions better instead of trying to eliminate those that disagree with you. It is not salty language that bothers you, as you give high fives to potty mouth liberals like mongo and Mariah when she was here. You simply get beat down in debate constantly and you can't handle it.

There is no debate on this forum, just insults and personal attacks, and you're the main purveyor.

If I may, I believe I have ridiculed and humiliated you on several occasions recently. But there's no hard feelings on my part. I'm willing to laugh it off if you are.

No, but you've tried and failed, unfortunately for you, in the words of Dino, I wouldn't give an insignificant internet dingleberry like you enough power over me to even slightly annoy me.

 

[Jack Davenport]

There is no debate on this forum, just insults and personal attacks, and you're the main purveyor.

"Cunt" is your go to insult and personal attack of choice.

Don't go all innocent on us now. There's plenty of debate. You just would not recognize it because you are always on the losing end of it.

No, but you've tried and failed, unfortunately for you, in the words of Dino, I wouldn't give an insignificant internet dingleberry like you enough power over me to even slightly annoy me.

Yet you returned after a sabbatical with "revenge " in your heart for those that never even slightly annoy you.

:1orglaugh

 

[xfire]

"Cunt" is your go to insult and personal attack of choice. Don't go all innocent on us now. There's plenty of debate. You just would not recognize it because you are always on the losing end of it. Yet you returned after a sabbatical with "revenge " in your heart for those that never even slightly annoy you.

If it fits, wear it, and I only resort to name calling when it's done to me first. No, there's not any debate, that's been out the door for a long time, in no small part thanks to you and your insults and personal attacks. I can get revenge on people based on principle alone, and that's exactly what I'm doing.

If I may, I believe I have ridiculed and humiliated you on several occasions recently. But there's no hard feelings on my part. I'm willing to laugh it off if you are.

And let's look at this one more time, what, exactly do I have to be humiliated about? Being white? Being from Texas? Come on, Michio Kaku, dazzle everyone with your wit.

 

[Jack Davenport]

I only resort to name calling after I have been embarrassed in an argument.

Hard to disagree with this.

 

[xfire]

Hard to disagree with this.

No, you try to take things to the worst possible conclusion. Always. I have nothing to be "embarrassed" about. Seriously, embarrassed because we have differing opinions? That's just stupid, but call me names, insult me, try to humiliate, dehumanize, and ridicule me, yeah, game on.

 

[Supafly]

No, your goal is to dehumanize, humiliate, and ridicule, and that's not ok and it's gone on for long enough.

Just quit talking to him. I had him on "Ignore" for a while, now I just don't respond to his mutterings.

He is just pressing your buttons, that is a waste of time and energy.

 

[Jack Davenport]

No, you try to take things to the worst possible conclusion. Always. I have nothing to be "embarrassed" about. Seriously, embarrassed because we have differing opinions? That's just stupid, but call me names, insult me, try to humiliate, dehumanize, and ridicule me, yeah, game on.

Oh.

Sorry.

Yeah, game on.































:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

 

[Jack Davenport]

Just quit talking to him. I had him on "Ignore" for a while, now I just don't respond to his mutterings.

He is just pressing your buttons, that is a waste of time and energy.

You gave me positive rep 3 days ago.:1orglaugh

I love you too bruderlein.

 

[sean miguel]

If it fits, wear it, and I only resort to name calling when it's done to me first. No, there's not any debate, that's been out the door for a long time, in no small part thanks to you and your insults and personal attacks. I can get revenge on people based on principle alone, and that's exactly what I'm doing.



And let's look at this one more time, what, exactly do I have to be humiliated about? Being white? Being from Texas? Come on, Michio Kaku, dazzle everyone with your wit.

:1orglaugh nice. No, you were right - I tried and failed.

 

[xfire]

Oh. Sorry. Yeah, game on. You gave me positive rep 3 days ago.

Because you posted something actually witty. This isn't football and you can't point to any debate with me that you've won.

nice. No, you were right - I tried and failed.

Right, so what was it were you trying to humiliate me about?

 

[xfire]

So the Frog brothers have decided to abandon this thread, what's the matter boys, out of wit?

Edgar and Alan Frog, that is.

 

[sean miguel]

So the Frog brothers have decided to abandon this thread, what's the matter boys, out of wit?

Edgar and Alan Frog, that is.

I know when I'm outmatched. The Michio Kaku reference was the kill shot.

 

[xfire]

Well, I mean, yeah, that was pretty funny, like if you sarcastically called me Einstein.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Because you posted something actually witty. This isn't football and you can't point to any debate with me that you've won.



Right, so what was it were you trying to humiliate me about?

You humiliate yourself. Like for the past 5 days.

Hey genius, the positive rep comment you quoted was to supafly, not you.

:1orglaugh

God bless Texas.

 

[xfire]

You humiliate yourself. Like for the past 5 days. Hey genius, the positive rep comment you quoted was to supafly, not you.

I could cure cancer and you would act like I should be humiliated. Don't you get it, you and your pet dog's opinions are worthless.

 

[Johan]

You humiliate yourself. Like for the past 5 days.

Actually, these past week, those who humiliated themlselves are the one who equivocated the nazis and the antifas. Because only one of these two groups had one of their guys kill someone from the other side.

Those who humiliated themslves are those who want to protect the memory of a bunch or pro-slavery traitors, of people who thought against the US.
That part of History shouldn' be erased, it should be taught to every kids how these gus choosed to betray their country to keep their right to own slaves. But, it should NEVER be celebrated. Thse people should never be described as American hero because they are the exact opposite : they are traitors who coosed to fought against America.
Robert E Lee doesn' belongs with Georges Washington, Thomas Jefferson and certainly not alonside Abrahaml Lincoln (who he thought against). They belong with King Georges III and John W. Booth

 

[xfire]

You and your pet dog's opinions are worthless.

This really can't be emphasized enough. Your opinions are worthless. You two put on an act, spam the board to make sure your posts are always the most recent and engage in the same dog and frog show, but the reality is that no one cares. You've already admitted that you're outnumbered, and the few people that might find you slightly amusing know, too, that you're both full of shit, have nothing to contribute beyond the occasional post that accidentally comes out funny. Really, both of you should just quit, but that's not going to matter by Monday.