bigbadbrody

Banned
the title needs to change less.

I am not a fan of long boring title runs. Unless of course there is a lot of over the top, crazy, controversial, and cutting edge things added to them. So much of the WWE is repetitive these days

vince needs to drop half the pay-per-views.

Yes they do need to, but then they would lose a lot of money
 
I am not a fan of long boring title runs. Unless of course there is a lot of over the top, crazy, controversial, and cutting edge things added to them. So much of the WWE is repetitive these days
if we dont see them wrestle every week, it will never be repetitive. get rid of ecw and smackdown, then get rid of all the useless wrestlers, and have raw every two weeks. have only 6 ppv's. the big four, king of the ring and another.



Yes they do need to, but then they would lose a lot of money
they will gain more in the long run.
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
the title needs to change less. vince needs to drop half the pay-per-views. wwf needs to go back to the old days. no wrestler but hogan was overused because we didnt see them wrestle each and every week.

I agree. Titles in the WWE need to change a lot less than what they do. I'm sick of seeing 2 month title runs, it's stupid and it just kills any sort of momentum that anyone has at that point. It's more exciting for the fans to see a long title run come to an end as well. Case in point...just pay attention to how crazy the crowd goes when Cena finally loses the belt.

I also think they need to have more "random" title changes. For example, have the WWE Championship change hands on RAW, unexpectedly. It sucks watching RAW or Smackdown already knowing, pretty much, exactly what is going to happen for the most part. The same can be said for PPV's, which is why I also agree that they should drop a few. Most of the matches are crap anyway. I'm tired of spending $35-40 already knowing how 90% of the matches are going to end.
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
I agree get rid of ECW and Smackdown.

I for one would not want to see long drawn out boring title runs. The titles need to change hands all the time between many different wrestlers in many different types of matches.

The shows need to be a lot more exciting, surprise us once in a while. Do some crazy shit, like back in the Austin days, or back when WWE was feuding with the Alliance or back in the original DX days. Gives us some entertainment that leaves us sitting on the edge of our seats. End the show leaving us hanging so we have to tune in next week.

Make the heels that everyone loves to hate the champion. such as Mr. Kennedy and Randy Orton and HHH. Not King Booker or MVP, they are boring and no one cares about them. This way everyone will tune in to see who the next challenger is.

Get rid of #1 contender ship matches, and surprise us with the next #1 contender.

Get rid of the king booker gimmick and bring back Booker T. I really want to see a spineroonie or two
 
I for one would not want to see long drawn out boring title runs. The titles need to change hands all the time between many different wrestlers in many different types of matches.
yeah, lets make the titles even more meaningless. :rolleyes:
 
They need to drop 6 ppv's, and ecw. Then cancel the whole Brand crap and go back to the two shows one roster that they had before. Plus drop 4 of the titles. Do they really need 2 main titles, 2 secondary titles, 2 tag team titles, and 2 were not big enough for any of the other titles but get a title anyway titles?
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
would the feuds last really long or would there be more feuds?

with only half the ppv's they would last longer. but, in my idea, all there is is raw every two weeks. i would even make it three hours to accommodate some good matches. (with no interference in 90% of them)
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
with only half the ppv's they would last longer. but, in my idea, all there is is raw every two weeks. i would even make it three hours to accommodate some good matches. (with no interference in 90% of them)

I agree that RAW (and WWE in general) needs to put a little more emphasis on quality and not quantity when it comes to their match card. I'm sad to admit that there's just too much of WWE on TV. RAW every Monday, ECW on Tuesday, Smackdown every Friday, and at least one PPV every month...it's too much.

They definitely need to get rid of ECW as well. I wouldn't mind keeping Smackdown around, as long as they cut the WWE roster in half. There are just way too many wrestlers that are battling for air time.

Also, I think they need to stop having "seperate" shows. Personally, I liked it better when you weren't really sure who was going to wrestle every night. It made me tune in a lot more. Ever since they seperated the rosters of RAW and Smackdown, you know exactly who is going to wrestle which kind of sucks...it doesn't leave much for surprise. It was better, in my opinion, when wrestlers would show up on either show and have a match, rather than having them only wrestle on a specific show.
 
I'm all for ending the brand extensions and consolidating all of the wrestlers on to one show. If they do decide to keep Smackdown/ECW then all of the wrestlers should appear on all three shows. Also I say they should combine the titles like they did a few years ago so that there is only one title in each catagory. There should only be one undisputed champion not three. Too many titles lessen their values. Cutting PPV's in half and having longer titles reigns would also be a good idea. Having titles change hands every other week not only lessen the value of the championship but also the champion. The main problem is the fact that the WWE has too many performers and no real competition. I do understand that they want to build talent for the future and with all of their veterans going down to injury they have to rely on new talent but they keep giving the new guys championships too quickly.
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
with only half the ppv's they would last longer. but, in my idea, all there is is raw every two weeks. i would even make it three hours to accommodate some good matches. (with no interference in 90% of them)

I totally disagree. I would rather have raw three hours every week with the titles changing hands all the time in a variety of matches. Interference in some of the matches but not all.

It is to boring when the same wrestlers wrestle each other week after week after week, or when one wrestler holds a title for months and months.
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
Smackdown News: Edge has been injured with a torn pectoral muscle that he sustained last week in the Mardi Gras angle. There will probably be a battle royal at tonight's taping to determine a new champion. The new champion will have their first title defense at Sunday's Great American Bash.
 
Smackdown News: Edge has been injured with a torn pectoral muscle that he sustained last week in the Mardi Gras angle. There will probably be a battle royal at tonight's taping to determine a new champion. The new champion will have their first title defense at Sunday's Great American Bash.

i want to say that batista will win it somehow. then defend against khali, but kane already has a title shot.
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
I HATE Batista and I HATE The Great Khali. I hope both of them get fired reeeeeally soon. They're not going to though, so I'll just continue hating them.

:cussing:
 
Top