Robert Mugabe or Slobodan Milošević to name a few
worst president in our lifetime.
- Thread starter gmaxman1212
- Start date
Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, has to go down as an entertaining one as well while were mentioning presidents. But Putin can put away alot of prostitutes in one night apparently there was a constant stream of them going into the russian's hotel during the recent A.P.E.C. summit
Actually if you understand what's going on "behind the scenes", the answer is actually rather simple--almost too simple.
I'm not going to say that Bush is the worst president of our lifetime; Bush is just a piss poor pawn in an elitist NWO's game. Besides, what you are seeing/have seen manifesting [up until] now, has been occuring since long before we were born, it's just that now it has reached it's boiling point.
Anyway, my answer is a tossup between LBJ and Nixon. LBJ lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident back in '64 to stir emotions to escalate the Vietnam War. Nixon continued the nonsense and did a piss poor job at convincing folk to believe his BS.
Actually, IMO the two worst presidents of all time were Wilson and FDR, for reasons I will give at a later time if anyone is interested in why.
I would be interested in why you think they might rank as two of the worst.
If they put Reagan's face on Rushmore I guarantee I'd have found a way to desecrate it.
Comedian/activist Dennis Miller once quipped that there was talk of adding Reagan's face to Rushmore, but planners were unsure if granite was a dense enough material to accurately portray the former president. :1orglaugh
And I thought yall only liked to talk about boobs and booty. :1orglaugh
Anyway, the reason(s) is this:
I despise Wilson because he signed off on the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th Amendment (income tax), which the former is the biggest manufacturer of Monopoly money, and the latter opened the door for the government to manipulate the nation into thinking they have to pay income tax (actually they don't; the only taxes to be paid to the federal government is CORPORATE income tax). But that's another discussion. Essentially, as a result, we have a central bank ran by elitists that can manipulate our economy on a single whim, and a currency that is not backed by any real money, just debt.
Roosevelt I despise for making our nation a socialist (read: big government) system, so now we depend on our government to take care of all our needs from the womb to the tomb, which is why we are in the trouble we are in, both domestically and internationally. Also, Roosevelt took our country off the gold standard domestically (Nixon did it internationally), and even conned our citizens into turning in whatever gold they owned under threats of jail and large fines if they didn't. He also intentionally instigated the Japanese through mean-spirited foreign policies and playing games with the Chinese to get them mad enough to bomb Pearl Harbor.
I'm writing a book here, but I hope you get the jist of what I'm saying here.
I appreciate your response.I really don't have much of an opinion on Wilson but on FDR while I do think you make some good points I think I would disagree somewhat.I do not think most americans depend on the govt from womb to tomb and that the new deal may have saved the country from a revolution during the depression. The creation of social security was a good thing IMO.And on the Japanease and pearl harbor I think that was a clash of two empires,so we may not really disagree much there.I think FDR was actually much more interested in getting involved in the war in europe and stopping Hitler and helping the English.
you've probably already seen it, america: freedom to fascism
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173
:crash:
The sad thing is that's true, and is there a material more dense than that in case we need it?
(at bolded). That's just it. If there was no Federal Reserve, there wouldn't have been a Great Depression because the elitists wouldn't have been at the controls manipulating our economy so that a depression would occured. And if there was no Great Depression, there would've been no New Deal needed.
You see, the elitists have been trying to make us dependent upon government under the guise that we would be safe and secure under big government while actually they wanted (and succeeded) in making us slaves.
Currently our nation has been drenced in gasoline. All that is needed now is for someone to light a match, which could happen as early as '08 in some form or fashion.
You're absolutely correct; FDR needed a reason for the US to get involved in WWII, and instigating the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor served as the perfect catalyst.
Great movie. RIP Aaron Russo.
P.S. Value your freedom to think freely and express discontent with our system and society....while it's still LEGAL!!
Sounds like this again. At least he included the family.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1221.htm
Strange, but I don't feel the least bit like a slave.
Maybe that means I'm an elitist?
What was FDR (and the League of Nations) supposed to do; continue to support Japan's imperialism, including the barbaric slaughter of hundreds of thousands (and potentially millions), by providing them the oil to carry that out?
You will once the trap is fully sprung. Guaranteed.
All 5 wars the US got involved in were for one reason and one reason only: to profit the elite by raising the national debt. We are not the world's police, and that is not our job as a nation.
Do you read enough?
I wasn't aware not feeling like a slave was indicative of illiteracy.
My bad, I guess
In such a complex world, discussing such complex issues, it must be nice to have such simple answers - hyperbolic and myopic as they may be
I don't suppose you'd be a "truther" too, by any chance?
Well gee I'm just quaking in my boots.
Fortunately I'll have you here to tip me off in the nick of time
I wasn't aware not feeling like a slave was indicative of illiteracy.
My bad, I guess
I think the word slave was used as it seems clear the gov't wants people as misinformed in the "free world", as the Communists did in their world. If you don't feel manipulated after being lied to continuously I had to ask if you keep up on world history and world news before and after y2000, WMD's and The New American Century plan of dividing up the Middle East;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1221.htm
I do not remember any involvement by the league of nations.Remember while Wilson was the one who proposed the league the US congress rejected the idea and the US was not a member.I think your point about Japans barbarism is valid though but would point out that its only winners who get to write the history of such things.An example being the extermination policies the US pursued against the native americans are really glossed over in our history books.
Similar threads
