Women are not attracted to penis

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
So he has to have a job that can support you and a child? That nixes most 20 to 30 year olds right there. Unless they have landed a stellar job out the gate. Its' been estimated that a person living ALONE has to make at least 15 bucks an hour to support just themselves.

Actually, it doesn't nix most of ANY age group. I know lots of people under 30 who are pulling in decent money. My younger brother is only 22 and half the year he makes $42 an hour (he's in the trades). Thats after only 2 years in college...

and anyways, why is everyone reading into this so much? All I did was re-iterate what was already said about women- they find money sexier than penor. Don't hate the truth! lol:rolleyes: Just wrap your peen in a Benjamin and you're good to go :D
 
Actually, it doesn't nix most of ANY age group. I know lots of people under 30 who are pulling in decent money. My younger brother is only 22 and half the year he makes $42 an hour (he's in the trades). Thats after only 2 years in college...

and anyways, why is everyone reading into this so much? All I did was re-iterate what was already said about women- they find money sexier than penor. Don't hate the truth! lol:rolleyes: Just wrap your peen in a Benjamin and you're good to go :D

It's not so much "reading into it" as it is an example of gender rolls changing but staying the same.

Used to be men were the bread winners and women weren't. Now women make just as much or sometimes more than their male counterparts but still the stereotype of men needing a good job is prevalent. It can become a catch 22.

I'm glad your brother is in the money; Lucky he's not one of the millions of unemployed talented labor that has no where to go atm. Lady luck smiles on a few.

IMO if you're going to get pregnant you better have a job that pays YOU enough to take care of things; after all relying to much on men is likely to end in disaster isn't it? You might also want a job that guarantees maternity leave etc... It's almost like the argument of who should be responsible for carrying / buying the condoms. The man or woman; when both should be equally responsible.

or we can go to jokes. If that's the case; "women can start putting hundred dollar bills in their vaginas so I have something worth going after" harhar.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
It's not so much "reading into it" as it is an example of gender rolls changing but staying the same.

Used to be men were the bread winners and women weren't. Now women make just as much or sometimes more than their male counterparts but still the stereotype of men needing a good job is prevalent. It can become a catch 22.

I'm glad your brother is in the money; Lucky he's not one of the millions of unemployed talented labor that has no where to go atm. Lady luck smiles on a few.

IMO if you're going to get pregnant you better have a job that pays YOU enough to take care of things; after all relying to much on men is likely to end in disaster isn't it? You might also want a job that guarantees maternity leave etc... It's almost like the argument of who should be responsible for carrying / buying the condoms. The man or woman; when both should be equally responsible.

or we can go to jokes. If that's the case; "women can start putting hundred dollar bills in their vaginas so I have something worth going after" harhar.

Well if and when I become a mom, I want to be a stay at home mom- its the way my own mom raised me and its a choice I've made for myself as well. No better gift to give my future kids than my time and love and attention. Anyone I seriously date has to not only be ok with this, but be supportive of it.

And I never said that its just men who need good jobs, I clearly stated that most men should expect their gfs not to be lazy, unmotivated cows too lol. I know if I were a dude, I'd hate to feel like my gf didn't give a rats ass about her life or future..it'd be so unsexy. And I've also clearly stated that I don't need a man to take care of me, I make my own money. But in every serious relationship or marriage, one partner eventually gets taken "out of commission" (be it pregnancy, an illness or cancer, loss of employement) and its kind of your partners job to take care of you...whether you're male or female in the relationship. Nothing wrong with expecting and needing that kind of financial support if and when shit hits the fan. Thats part of marriage- having a partner to take care of you when you need it. Hence why I wouldn't date someone who didn't have the potential to do that for me.
 
My opinion is that a relationship should be based on a strong intellectual connection. If two people have that, than they should be able to work through any realistic issues they encounter. Granted money is a big issue in a relationship, it shouldn't be a prerequisite when determining to enter one.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
My opinion is that a relationship should be based on a strong intellectual connection. If two people have that, than they should be able to work through any realistic issues they encounter. Granted money is a big issue in a relationship, it shouldn't be a prerequisite when determining to enter one.

Everyone has their own list of pre-requisites though...whether you think you do or don't, you do. Whether you are attracted to someone with a sense of humor, or want someone who has a certain moral compass (most people probably wouldn't date or marry someone in this industry for instance) or wanting someone to not partake in drugs or alcohol etc...everyone has deal breakers and everyone has preferences. Who is anyone to judge what someone might prefer or require before getting serious with a partner? I seriously don't see how its a big deal.

(and its not so much the money thats the thing, its just having someone who works hard, and is motivated- laziness is just unattractive.
 
Everyone has their own list of pre-requisites though...whether you think you do or don't, you do. Whether you are attracted to someone with a sense of humor, or want someone who has a certain moral compass (most people probably wouldn't date or marry someone in this industry for instance) or wanting someone to not partake in drugs or alcohol etc...everyone has deal breakers and everyone has preferences. Who is anyone to judge what someone might prefer or require before getting serious with a partner? I seriously don't see how its a big deal.

(and its not so much the money thats the thing, its just having someone who works hard, and is motivated- laziness is just unattractive.

Its not a big deal. To each his own(or her own). Just an interesting topic to debate.
 
Well if and when I become a mom, I want to be a stay at home mom- its the way my own mom raised me and its a choice I've made for myself as well. No better gift to give my future kids than my time and love and attention. Anyone I seriously date has to not only be ok with this, but be supportive of it.

And I never said that its just men who need good jobs, I clearly stated that most men should expect their gfs not to be lazy, unmotivated cows too lol. I know if I were a dude, I'd hate to feel like my gf didn't give a rats ass about her life or future..it'd be so unsexy. And I've also clearly stated that I don't need a man to take care of me, I make my own money. But in every serious relationship or marriage, one partner eventually gets taken "out of commission" (be it pregnancy, an illness or cancer, loss of employement) and its kind of your partners job to take care of you...whether you're male or female in the relationship. Nothing wrong with expecting and needing that kind of financial support if and when shit hits the fan. Thats part of marriage- having a partner to take care of you when you need it. Hence why I wouldn't date someone who didn't have the potential to do that for me.

I get what you're saying but because someone doesn't earn as much as someone else or enough to support you if your income stops doesn't mean they're "lazy".

Essentially for a mate It all boils down to income dollars and that still imo is superficial no matter how important you might feel it may be.

Because honestly if you lose your job everyone tightens their belt and scrimps. You don't say oh well and continue to live comfortably. Typically in any joint financial relationships your money is called on for things together. Therefore if you lose one both people's standard of living is downgraded meaning you both have to start saving money.

"Taking care of" to me sounds like "oh you lost ur job? we'll just pay bills and continue on like nothing happened". Perhaps I'm interpreting that incorrectly but that's how it sounded to me.

I see it as if one person loses their job both people have lost a job; if it's a marriage like what you're speaking of. I just like to think that relationships might be grounded in something deeper than spousal support if things begin to suck for one person. Typically the motivation behind that help that drives it in the first place.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
I get what you're saying but because someone doesn't earn as much as someone else or enough to support you if your income stops doesn't mean they're "lazy".

Essentially for a mate It all boils down to income dollars and that still imo is superficial no matter how important You Might feel it may be.

Because honestly if you lose your job everyone tightens their belt and scrimps. You don't say oh well and continue to live comfortably. Typically in any joint financial relationships your money is called on for things together. Therefore if you lose one both people's standard of living is downgraded meaning you both have to start saving money.

"Taking care of" to me sounds like "oh you lost ur job? we'll just pay bills and continue on like nothing happened". Perhaps I'm interpreting that incorrectly but that's how it sounded to me.

I see it as if one person loses their job both people have lost a job; if it's a marriage like what you're speaking of. I just like to think that relationships might be grounded in something deeper than spousal support if things begin to suck for one person. Typically the motivation behind that help that drives it in the first place.


Lets just agree to disagree. Everyone is entitled to prefer or want different things in a spouse, like I said its no ones business but our own. It doesn't have to turn into a debate lol. This thread was about peen, not moolah.

*really regrets agreeing with the dude who said women like money* LOL
 
Lets just agree to disagree. Everyone is entitled to prefer or want different things in a spouse, like I said its no ones business but our own. It doesn't have to turn into a debate lol. This thread was about peen, not moolah.

*really regrets agreeing with the dude who said women like money* LOL

If there is no friendly debate then internet forms are only for the trolls and memes lol. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and no one is inherently correct. But I do like sharing and receiving opinions about things like this as I find them informative.

:glugglug:
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
oh and fwiw, penises look extra yummy when they look like this:

2868856858_63b1dab96a_z.jpg
 
Y'know..... idk how women can do that.. equate food to male anatomy and still think it's yummy lol.

I would never look at a hamburger and think yeah.....yum like a vagina. or worse.. I'm think Arby's

beef-n-cheddar.jpg


What a delicious mound....am I right?
 
SpexyAshleigh said:
Well if and when I become a mom, I want to be a stay at home mom- its the way my own mom raised me and its a choice I've made for myself as well. No better gift to give my future kids than my time and love and attention. Anyone I seriously date has to not only be ok with this, but be supportive of it.

I have a question for you just out of curiousity. Lets say you're married and you and your husband have a child and your husband wants to work part-time (wich means you have to work part-time as well) because he feels time, love and attention are just as important to the child as yours....would you be ok with that?
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
I have a question for you just out of curiousity. Lets say you're married and you and your husband have a child and your husband wants to work part-time (wich means you have to work part-time as well) because he feels time, love and attention are just as important to the child as yours....would you be ok with that?

That would entirely depend on our financial needs, how much of an income I could provide vs. him...if he wanted to do that, it would have to wait until after the first year so we could exercise my maternity benefits...but its definitely something I would consider. Of course its important for him to get more time as well, so if I could find a job that worked around his work schedule (ie. I work 9-noon and he works noon-5pm) then that would be the ideal situation.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
exactly what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying you have to be a millionaire, or even be making six figures...but you have to be able to support yourself, and be able to support a family if it came to that. Sorry, if you aren't making enough to support a baby should one arrive, then you're not longterm relationship material. Family is important, and providing for said family is important too. And school IS important...if you're working hard at it, its a great asset. I'm not saying theres anything wrong with being in school..its a great thing. I'm just saying that if you're the kind of guy who's content flipping burgers and not doing anything else with your life...then thats not the person I wanna be with. If you have passion for your career and continually move forward and set goals and work towards them...then be whatever you want. I'd rather date a successful plumber than a lazy CEO of a company. Know what I mean? I sincerely hope I'm not coming off as a golddigger because I'm not. I just like to know that whoever I'm in a serious relationship with has my back in case god forbid I get sick, or get pregnant, or whatever. Shit happens and if I don't have financial support IF (and inevitably when, because shit always happens eventually) I need it, then thats not someone I feel secure with. Ya know?

I understand where you're coming from. But that's what all people (most, I would say) are looking for. One good reason for getting married and having a family is that you'll have someone there for you as you go through life, get older, get sick, fall on hard times, etc. People with whom you can share the good times, as well as the bad. I think you recognize that it's a two way street. Sadly, I don't think that a lot of women feel that way - not in my experience anyway. And there are more than a few men out there, who I think of as suckers and wimps, who don't mind being work horses for some self described "princess". In their minds, they want "traditional" relationships; ones where they work and their wife stays at home. But if/when things go south, they end up paying alimony and child support (under threat of jail), yet it's her option as to whether or not they get to see their child. From college to now, I have always been heavily involved in statistics and probabilities. So with stats showing that most marriages dissolve over financial issues, there's a divorce rate of nearly 50%, roughly 90% of divorces are initiated by women and court systems (in the U.S.) favor the ex-wife and mother, I'm almost amazed that any man (of means or not) would get married to begin with. It's certainly not for me. Before she set me up with her friend's sister (my current girl), my platonic friend said she saw me as a Jaguar (odd, as that's also my car brand of choice): I'd come out of the jungle, mate and then go away until the next mating season. Until I got together with this girl, my preference was to just eat what I killed and go it alone. Less hassle and drama that way.

BTW, I know you were somewhat joking to make a point. But I'm actually agreeing with you: rather than sending out pictures of their johnson, even a small-dicked guy can wrap it in a $100 bill and get at least a date (for as long as he has $100 bills). It's the gold diggers who mess it up for girls who just want a decent life and partnership. And it's the guys who spend any portion of their lives toying with gold diggers (playing them before getting played) who get jaded and paranoid about ANY sort of long term relationship.
 
You keep doing what you're doing. Don't let anyone or anything pull you off that path. You're 20 now? When I was 20 I was pretty much in the same boat. I don't come from a rich family. My dad owned a farm and some land where I grew up and I never went without. But we weren't "rich" - not like some of the kids I went to college with, whose dads bought them new BMW's as high school graduation presents. Without boring you with my life story, let's just say that one of the first girls to break my heart while I was in college wound up with a guy who played pro football after college (for all of one season!). She chose what she thought was the "better catch". Not that I was Prince Charming, but certainly on paper, within a couple of years after school, my income and net worth easily dwarfed his... what with him working a factory job after they moved back from (got run out of) San Diego vs. me co-owning a mortgage company and a shitload of real estate by then. When people are just starting out, all you're doing is rolling the dice if you think you can pick a winner vs. a loser at that age. Some winners turn into losers and some losers turn into winners.

Thanks for the advice, man. I know exactly where you're coming from with this. I have always had food on the table and basic luxuries like the internet, but overall my family just doesn't have much dough. I see those guys my age who drive BMWs, have credit cards and can easily impress girls more than I can. It sucks to see so many hott girls always choosing some ugly douche bag just because he's "cool."

Do you think that girl chose him over you because of his money? Girls always think it's cool to go out with the super athletic guys.

I'm trying to see everybody's point of view on this. Spexy is one of the more thoughtful people on this board and I think she's saying that a guy doesn't have to be Mr. Moneybags to get her attention, but he has to have something going on. And that's cool. But to your point, as I was once pretty much in your boat many moons ago, any girl who tries to judge a guy by what she can see in his driveway or what's on his wrist... what's in the driveway or on the wrist today may be subject to removal by the bank tomorrow. And when I was younger, if I sensed that a girl was on my jock because of my car, watch or whatever, I was going to dog her. In my (rather twisted) sense of the world back then, she was a whore and would/should be treated as such. Michael Milken, Donald Trump and the fictional Gordon Gekko were my heroes... so what does that tell you? If I met a girl in Georgetown at Winston's on a Friday night, I'd gladly take her to Ocean City on a Saturday/Sunday weekend get-away. She was my "entertainment"... and that's all she was. She was only with me because her friends saw me pull up in a new Jag and I was wearing a Rolex. But since there'd be 20 other girls in the bar next weekend, just like her, there wasn't any chance or need for me to call her back again, was there? So I was a superficial, shitty person and she was a superficial, shitty person too. And superficial, shitty people attract other superficial, shitty people. Don't be a superficial, shitty person, Grower. It took me years to rid myself of being like that. Now I'm with a pretty (but not gorgeous) girl who has two Masters degrees, but she doesn't make much money working with special needs kids. She gets by and she's not consumed with how much I make or what I have. If I buy her something nice, it's not because she expects it, it's because I like her. I know I'm not buying her affections and she knows I respect her too much to try. I'm jaded and fairly paranoid now, so that (to me) makes her a trustworthy, good catch - plus she can cook! Considering how I've lived most of my adult life, I probably don't deserve someone like her... but I'm happy to have her.

Keep doing what you're doing, young dude! If you're not consumed by money, cars or whatever, then a girl who is, isn't the one for you anyway. The right one is out there. Trust me on that one.

I think it's cool that you admit to once being a "superficial, shitty person." But if you're getting with different women every weekend just for having money, it would be hard to turn that down. Most girls seem to want a good time, and a good time (for most of them) requires money and transportation. You're right though, if a girl was right for me she wouldn't require anything too superficial.

And dude, girls are the only reason I would go to Ocean City, :1orglaugh

Oh yeah, and to get back on topic, don't send her pictures of your dick. It'll either offend her... or you'll find out it's a dude and then you've got a gay stalker to deal with. :nono:

:1orglaugh I won't do that. I'll show her a live performance and that's it.
 
How can you say that women don't like penis?? Just take a look at this picture. She looks like she loves it!!! I'm sure most women do.

plib_nikki_benz04.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCT
Top