I agree that boxing could be one of the easiest sports to take up, but it would definetly be one of the most difficult to master, as there is the extremely brutal beating you take to the face and cranium, which no sport can rival.
These figures are not very different from the line up of the present England rugby team.To sum up the misconceptions of American Sports:
American Football is a super violent sport. Without pads, most players would not last a single game. Yes, Rugby is violent (and I love Australian Rules Football as well) but when you have a 300 pound guy that runs just as fast as a guy who weighs 220 pounds and wants to kill him on every play.....
Take this formation: Jacksonville Jaguars line up in a goal line formation and include the following players.
K.Barnes: 6'5 325 (left Tackle)
V.Manuwai: 6'2 336 (left guard)
B.Meester: 6'3 295 (center)
C.Naole: 6'3 328 (right guard)
T.Pashos: 6'6 325 (right tackle)
M.Stroud: 6'6 310 (usually plays defense, plays Tight End on this play)
J.Henderson: 6'7 335 (usually plays defense, plays Tight End on this play)
G.Estandia: 6'8 265 (Tight End)
G.Jones: 6'1 254 (Fullback)
F.Taylor: 6'1 228 (half back)
D.Garrard: 6'1 245 (quaterback)
That is just the offense, their combined weight on this play is 3246 pounds. Nowhere else do you get that kind of human mass hellbent on moving a leather bound ball. The defense will man about 2500-3500 pounds themselves to stop this play.
.
Exactly. That's my point. There's no real way to evaluate all sports based on skill level. The group of academics ESPN cobbled together might as well study the rule books of each sport and come to their conclusions.
I looked at the results of their study, saw GOLF listed near the bottom and came to conclusion that nobody on that panel has ever played golf before in their lives...
These figures are not very different from the line up of the present England rugby team.
I can't stand football - too many damned stoppages during play. Too many "flags", too many rules and a little too much "direction", know what I mean? It's nearly not as "spontaneous" as a sport ought to be. You have 4 quarters of 15 minutes each and it takes hours to fucking play.
[/B]
Golf does not require these: ENDURANCE, SPEED, NERVE and DURABILITY. I played Golf for 10 year's and I noticed it is quite popular with 60+ year old people that hardly make them a athlete like a Soccer player or a one in Gymnastics.
I agree that boxing could be one of the easiest sports to take up, but it would definetly be one of the most difficult to master, as there is the extremely brutal beating you take to the face and cranium, which no sport can rival.
boxing isn't difficult or demanding.
Right I'll put this into the simple terms for you here.
Put a marshal artist into a ring with a boxer and see just how long the boxer lasts. Pound for Pound that is or even a slight weight difference in the boxers favour if you want.
As I said before, boxing isn't difficult or demanding. A marshal art is, in both mind and body. Especially if you compete in it. I speak from experience having done both. All that boxing really is barbaric compared to most other fighting forms.
Usually people who disagree when they say it is the most physical sport are the ones who have either only ever done that or not done it at all. If you try different forms of fighting styles you'll soon see that for yourself. Because the only thing boxing can say it has over other's is endurance. But half the time you don't even need that.
You crack me up.
BTW - I liked the idea behind the subject in this thread.
I thought it was an interesting question.
I explained my thinking earlier.
But another answer?
Americans are more take charge kind of people then Europeans in general. And the average American is far more powerful then the average European (both in the power of their country, their economic wealth and their individual personal freedoms). And with that added power comes an added desire to control his/her surroundings. I believe American football and baseball offer that more then soccer does. They are far more hands on sports to the average fan then soccer is - at least in appearance.
There is little 'armchair quarterbacking' in soccer. You just sit and watch it flow. Neither baseball or American football could ever be called games that flow. They are a series of starts and stops lasting usually under 30 seconds. With, IMO, coaches/managers playing a far larger part in these major Americans sports then coaches do in soccer (no doubt many soccer lovers will disagree with me).
And because of Canada's proximity to America, we have taken up many of there ways and television likes (as US television dominate Canadians).
Nobody is going to argue with the power of America but there are several European countries where average wealth is far higher than in the US.Even the UK citizen is roughly on a par (difficult to tell because of the weak dollar) with our American friends.And individual personal freedoms? I can't own a gun but I can drive with an open container of alcohol in my car!
With, IMO, coaches/managers playing a far larger part in these major Americans sports then coaches do in soccer (no doubt many soccer lovers will disagree with me).