In your eyes, the statement you make below and the one I make are equal in the point they convey?? Although you go on later to agree that it depends on the criteria, we're not saying the same things in the 2 statements below.
:laughs:
Sorry, I didn't explain myself as clearly as I should have, HM. :crying:
What I meant to say is your statement is basically an extention of what I said. You added criteria which I agree with. You can add more criteria if you like.
Yours conveys a simple matter of personal taste or outside influence. Mine says beyond simple personal tastes, the degree of criteria a person uses affects their comparisons of like things. For example, some see "enhanced" tits as a detraction irrespective of the quality or effect on a girl's appearance. Others don't draw a distinction between "enhanced" tits and natural tits as long as they look good.
You put some butter on my toast. Once again I agree. I see nothing to disagree on here. :2 cents:
I suppose the point of it is as lucid as every reply you've made in this thread beyond your basic point.
![Cool :cool: :cool:]()
.
:laughs:
You should re-read my response. I never compared her to Rembrandt but to Rembrandt's work.:2 cents: And I think you either missed the point of that post or read into it the wrong way.
.
It was very clear to me that you were comparing GG to Rembrandt's work. I should have typed an "a" before Rembrandt to make it clear that I was also refering to Rembrandt's work. :thumbsup:
But if you want to try and relate it to this thread...let's. The context of this thread is why is GG so popular (presumably) as compared to other models on FOs? If it's your suggestion that she is somehow more popularly advertised here beyond what's been done for others, where is the case for that?
GG clearly gets her fair share of advertising here at freeones. This thread is a perfect example. I'm talking about her even though I'm not really a fan. Every time an OCSMs name is used or a pic is posted it's advertising/promotion. I've no idea if she is somehow more popularly advertised here beyond what's been done for others as I don't pay much attention to GG. Models with dark hair, skin and eyes are noramlly of more interest to me. I simply reply to posts that catch my attention to.
However, I would guess she is more popularly advertised because it would make good business sense to promote the more popular models. She is cleary very popular.
If freeones were running a promotion they are much more likely to use a very popular and well recognised face like GG than a less well known model, aren't they? So my guess is she probably does get a bit more air time then say Rebekah Dee. That's business. That's life. :2 cents:
Further, when you look at the Miss FOs contest for example and her placing...among those who did promoted themselves (versus those who did no promoting) for the contest..she probably promoted herself the least. Yet she placed quite prominently (5th) and the only one of the 10 finalists who doesn't perform hard core. To what do you attribute that? Certainly some of it is her being a familiar OCSM here but if it were just about that she wouldn't have even made the top 50 IMO. As there are other, more familiar, possibly more "popular" OCSMs who didn't place in the top 50.
.
:laughs:
Let's not talk about the FO contest. I don't think anyone of us regular members knows what was really going on behind the Miss FO thread. I'll just say this. If I remember correctly at one point even some of the contestants were questioning the vote count. Let's just agree GG did very well and leave it at that.
I'm disappointed. It took you this long to get to the proverbial vested interest response.:crying: Besides, if I can't even convince someone like you, how accomplished can I actually be at it?:tongue:
But why would someone with a vested interest in promoting GG create a thread seeking to find others as good or better?
I was just joking with you HM. I hope I didn't hit a raw nerve. :dunno:
You can create as many GG posts/threads as you like. Knock yourself out. It's a huge board.
Really??
![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
I suppose that would have been the point of me suggesting how superficially one person may look at something as compared to how intricately another may.
Now this bit is funny because if you go back and have a look you will see all I did was type the words:
'I think the results of any comparison'
before your reply and post your response back to you. Once again I basically agree with you and there is nothing to disagree on here in my opinion.