Context and relevance anyone?
I had a good friend that was gay he died from aids.
I absolutely do not understand where this came from.
Beyond the fact that most of us know people who have died of AIDS and/or are infected with HIV (their sexual orientation having absolutely no bearing on that -- especially when we through Hep-C outbreak in to the equation as well), I fail to see what that statement was remotely made for, at least in response to myself. I think you should be responding with that statement to others in the thread, not myself.
You can start by not only reading, but understanding my statements, not what you want to assume about them -- possibly after reading what others stated. Honestly, please re-read what I said, it was very open and neutral between
many views in this thread.
Never judge someone before you get to know him or her.
And I judged ... whom? Anyone? I think not.
I merely pointed out that
others who decide to call some people "gay" for DP, double vaginal, etc... are only opening themselves to some of us wondering "why?" someone feels compelled to make it about "gayness" or whatever. In fact, I specifically said it wasn't enough to consider someone "homophobic" (differing with several others), but it still doesn't answer that first question.
Why do people feel the need to call it "gay" or otherwise think some men who engage in such are otherwise screwed up and not normal? That's the judgment in question here, as I have offered none myself -- none at all. I hope you re-read my post and recognize that.
