thanksimout
Loves the double vag
Do women like double vaginal?
My wife does. check that, she doesn't like it she loves it.
Do women like double vaginal?
Do women like double vaginal?
I can tell you that I am 100% straight and I would give anyything to try a double vaginal or a double anal. Hell, even triple vaginal or anal (yes it exists - I have the video to prove it )
No worries dude, what you like is the extra tightness and the friction, plus the lube of the cum. Its not the idea you're into, it's the feeling it gives you. And face it, tighter hole and more friction and wetness is going to feel BETTER
To the original poster....I don't understand why if you know for sure you are not attracted to men, you have to question your sexuality over this... But I have to admit that most American men are really silly when it comes to this things.
Nevertheless, don't pay attention to those that tell you that because you did this, somehow you are a repressed homosexual. They are the ones that sound really repressed sexually. Think about it...if this were two girls pleasing a man, no body would even question it. The lovely ladies were just satisfying their men... But because it is two guys and one girl, some start jumping to wild conclusions. It's part of their homophobia, their problem, don't let their opinion affect you.
I don't think this makes you gay or bi, but you have to realize that there is nothing wrong with that either. Otherwise you are giving power to this people to distress you with.
This is b.s. imo. A lot of gay people and, whatever you want to call yourself Mr. Transsexual, use this tactic. I'm sure it's the same thing many of these folks tell themselves when they start cruising or putting on women's underwear or makeup the first time. You can wish and hope and deny whatever you want in order to get more people to try, but it's still gay.
If there's no definition or parameters for a term, than it serves no purpose. Folks such as yourself spend a lot of time, in fact create whole cottage industries telling people that sexuality is irrelavant. Well who says? You? If it comes down to your opinion, than the opinion of others are just as valid. If the majority of men will say "that's not something a straight man would do" than it's gay.
Why does it seem that gays seem preoccupied with getting seducing straight men? I think examining that objectively will expose an ugly secret in the gay community.
This is b.s. imo. A lot of gay people and, whatever you want to call yourself Mr. Transsexual, use this tactic. I'm sure it's the same thing many of these folks tell themselves when they start cruising or putting on women's underwear or makeup the first time. You can wish and hope and deny whatever you want in order to get more people to try, but it's still gay.
If there's no definition or parameters for a term, than it serves no purpose. Folks such as yourself spend a lot of time, in fact create whole cottage industries telling people that sexuality is irrelavant. Well who says? You? If it comes down to your opinion, than the opinion of others are just as valid. If the majority of men will say "that's not something a straight man would do" than it's gay.
Why does it seem that gays seem preoccupied with getting seducing straight men? I think examining that objectively will expose an ugly secret in the gay community.
What tactic? In your asinine attempt to put me in my place, and mix transgenderism with homosexuality, you forgot to mention what is the "tactic" you are talking about.
When did I said sexuality was irrelevant? Please stop twisting my message.
This guy said he had double vaginal penetratrion and he enjoyed . He should care less what people like you think and/or label him That's my point.
How do we jump from double-vaginal penetration to gay men seducing straight guys?? Double Vaginal Penetration must be a conspiracy by gay men to turn straight men gay..LMAO:rofl:
This is one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
Oh really?
You seem to disagree with everything I say, so whatever.
And understandably, this is the best you can come up with....You're the one who brought it up.
Yeah, this person seems to have something personal against you, therefore it doesn't matter what this person says....and the gays are consuming themselves trying to seduce "straight" men like you, by putting on women's underwear and make-up. :rofl: Makes a lot of sense... LMAO
Yeah, this person seems to have something personal against you, therefore it doesn't matter what this person says....and the gays are consuming themselves trying to seduce straight men like you, by putting on women's underwear and make-up. :rofl: Makes a lot of sense... LMAO
Yes, please. Do not take it personally. I don't dissagree with you because you are you. I disagree with what you're saying. That's a big difference.
The idea that there are homosexual people out there conciously trying to broaden their numbers... by seducing straight men... that doesn't sound just a bit far fetched to you?
Like I said, it's nothing personal. It's just the ideas, the points, I'm arguing here.
And understandably, this is the best you can come up with....
And you do what? Laughing? I'm sorry but you do nothing to refute my posts, to counter anything people say. You even trot out that lame old "People who disagree with you are homophobic, and because of this, they're probably repressed."
Right, and you know this how? From some biased study that says it? About the only thing you have on your side is that you have political correctness on your side. I'm taking the unpopular stance in criticizing gays, I get bashed for it. So what. But a lot of times what is politically correct and what is true don't line up. You'll see this in how definitions change with political currents. In your case, the APA is fighting over whether or not to reclassify transsexuals as mentally ill.