:goodpost: This.
Pure capitalism would mean absolutely no public funding for anything. So you "capitalism" voters would want a privately-held armed *****, police *****, fire protection, etc?? This is totally impractical. Even it all these functions were performed by private contractors, who do you get to pay for them if the funds do not come from a common pool? It's a totally untenable concept for any functioning society. A certain degree of funding for purposes designed for the common good is not only a good idea but is literally an essential element of any cooperative human existence. The only other option is pure anarchy. Problem is, in America, "socialism" is a scare word that goes all the way back to the cold war....intimating that anything "socialist" is, by association, communist and therefore an inherent evil. Americans have been conditioned to think of socialism in this fashion....at least the uneducated portion of the population which, unfortunately, represents the majority on many occasions.
From my perspective, a system that mixes the best elements of both capitalism and socialism provides the greatest benefit to society as a whole.