If I may interject; I think if you were to ask any atheist whether or not they believed in some form of a higher power the answer would probably come in two forms. Subjectively – for the most part - they’d say that they absolutely do not believe that a higher power exists, but objectively they would have to conclude that it is because of the lack of evidence to show one way or another the question will have to remain an unknown until that evidence does surface (if it ever does). So there is an element of assumption in that.
No argument there.
I'm trying to point out in what way wording it, can give the fundie an excuse not to listen to you.
That as ideal as your point sounds and as acurate to your own point of view,
when arguing with the fundies, saying that is the view of atheism razes the assumption you are saying all atheists are the same way, leaves you open to the label of a religion.
and the fundamentalists both atheist and theist will put you on a particular side.
and I'm pointing out fanatics attach them selves to any ideology.
But (before the local fundie jumps down my throat) this is the exact same situation most believers find themselves in. Yes they can drone on and on about how they feel a divine presence in their heart blah, blah, blah and all that nonsense. But that is in no way proof and any rational person should see how ridiculous this form of argumentation really is. And in the grand scheme of things it’s not the believer asking the important questions in this argument.
But there have been many irrational ideals that came from atheism, the worst one being the socialist idea that natural selection justifies mass murder.
the real reason for such rationalizations is to justify cruelty.
regardless of the ideology.
nothing is fool proof because fools are so ingenious.
It is the believer who takes their belief at face value and does absolutely no critical thinking about it. Where are their scientific explanations for our existence on this planet or how the universe came into being and Evolved?
isn't it a belief that there is only the tangible, and that the universe is a godless mechanism of chance and and natural selection and nothing more, when we don't have the whole picture of everything?
theories are a beliefe, a very well educated and researched belief but one none the less.
In true faith Critical thinking is not finding justification for defending a bullshit stories of fairy tails, its in depth insightful analysis of ones own self in relation to the world around the individual and involves extremely abstract thought.
You have to ask, who really is taking the bigger leap of “faith” here? Those who believe what they’re told by whatever religious leader they abide by and have grown up with or the person who states that no, there is no proof that any form of higher power exists whatsoever and until the time comes when that evidence does surface as to whether or not there is or isn't a higher power why should I believe in him/her or it?
in return I can say how ridicules is it for scientists to believe in magical forces like gravity and black wholes - super strings and multiple dimensions, because some guy in a lab coat who makes guesses.
Those were some amazing leaps of faith.
Einstein came up with a whole new universe just by thinking about it.
and so far he's been right.
both the scientist and the mystic take amazing leaps of faith,
and both have influenced the other,
as a spiritualist and someone who can make assumptions - of course I make bigger leaps of faith, and without critical thinking it is not hard to delude myself.
I think that also applies to atheism as well.
a reason why I can not take an absolute position of saying my way is the right way, but like all rational critical thinkers do have a reasoning for my point of view.
It does not matter what your point of view is, it is not incorruptible.
no philosophy is perfect because people lie to themselves.