So individuals with hours of training - far more than our novice shooter - still miss despite their training...I can tell you I've seen individuals with many times more training and experience than the average guy who just goes and buys a handgun then spends a few days a week trying to hit a bullseye at the range become fairly disoriented in a CQ situation. There are cops who spend countless more hours training with firearms but in the heat of a confrontation with and aggressive target they've nearly emptied entire clips within 10 or 15 ft. and hit nothing.
So if in the event a novice finds himself in a close quarter situation with an aggressive target it would likely be more luck than not if they hit the target....But in the event they do you make sure who ever it is stops or is in no condition to still overpower this person who likely has no particular hand to hand skills.
How about this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lzri8dn7p0
Huh? I think we have ourselves a winner :nanner:
So individuals with hours of training - far more than our novice shooter - still miss despite their training...
... but you still recommend a novice a caliber he is less likely to be able to control even though he has next to no training?
Does training matter at all then?
Provided that the shots - aimed or otherwise - don't miss.
And the chances are that a bigger round with greater recoil will have a greater chance of missing - especially when being handled by a relative 'novice'. Hence also why I recommend getting a shotgun - if we're going big, we might as well get the most spread to compensate for lack of accuracy.
"Bigger bang for your buck" is not always the best solution is all I'm sayin' - "stopping power" only comes into play if you hit and an inexperienced shooter is less likely to hit with a weapon he has less control over.
I'm not sure we are talking against each other in as much as we are talking past each other.
In any case, this entire discussion is moot - it's upto Jagger and what he finds "comfortable"
cheers,
R. (My 'carry' pistol is my Father's WWII combat tested 1911. It has been my constant companion since Vietnam).
All except this one I s'pposeSee my other posts in this thread. I covered all of what you question in your post.
Does training matter at all then?
Thanks(BTW, kudos on the .45 ACP:thumbsup
All except this one I s'ppose
Thanks
It's over 60 years old.
It still shoots as true as the day my Father shot it in anger at Guadalcanal through Okinawa.
"I survived" three tours of Vietnam at its side.
My son thinks it's an 'heirloom' (he doesn't dislike it... he's just all big into the H&Ks and the CZs - the former I'm not so sure about but the latter I heartily recommend).
My daughter on the other hand recognizes the pistol for what it truly is...
... a piece of genuine history and a connection with the past. A tool that helped keep her 'Grampa' and her 'Papa' safe.
cheers,
Does training matter at all then?