Tucson Sheriff Won't Enforce 'Stupid' 'Racist' New Immigration Law

I'm glad this officer has spoken out against this racist law that violates the civil liberties of Brown skinned citizens

http://gawker.com/5527002/tucson-sheriff-wont-enforce-stupid-racist-new-immigration-law

Hey! Arizona still has good citizens left. Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik declared his refusal to comply with his state's ugly, xenophobic new law, calling it "humiliating" and "racist." Way to go, Dupnik! Too bad you will probably get sued.


Arizona recently passed a law giving the police broad powers to detain people they suspect of being in the country illegally. If you are thinking this sounds like some kind of xenophobic police-state bullshit essentially mandating racial profiling, well, you are thinking right.

But why take our word for it? Clarence Dupnik runs shit in Tucson and the surrounding area. He has been a cop for fifty goddamn years. And he thinks this law sucks, too:

Sheriff Clarence Dupnik calls SB 1070 "racist," "disgusting," and "unnecessary."
Speaking Tuesday morning with KGUN9's Steve Nunez, Dupnik made it clear that while he will not comply with the provisions of the new law, nor will he let illegal immigrants go free. "We're going to keep doing what we've been doing all along," Dupnik said. "We're going to stop and detain these people for the Border Patrol."
But here's the thing about Arizona's fun new no-Mexicans-allowed law: It's so stupid, Clarence can't actually keep doing his job the way he's supposed to. One of the law's provisions allows him to be sued if his constituents don't think he's complying.

The sheriff acknowledged that this course of action could get him hauled into court. SB 1070 allows citizens to sue any law enforcement official who doesn't comply with the law. But Dupnik told Nunez that SB 1070 would force his deputies to adopt racial profiling as an enforcement tactic, which Dupnik says could also get him sued. "So we're kind of in a damned if we do, damned if we don't situation. It's just a stupid law."
If we were Clarence Dupnik, we would quit. But we're not, thank God. See, Dupnik has a solution: "The November election."
 

MILF Man

milf n' cookies
If he's not going to enforce a law, that means he's not doing his job and biding by the oath he took. He should be fired!

You don't like the law, then rally support and have the law changed. How long before sheriffs in this country start using this same kind of asinine thought process to enforce what laws they want to on a daily basis?
 
Good bloke.

Racist laws are not worth enforcing. Why there is so much hate directed at Hispanics et al who just come to work hard and better their lives.

If I was in power, I would find it extremely hard not to have pretty much open borders, allowing for obvious security requirements.
 

MILF Man

milf n' cookies
Good bloke.

Racist laws are not worth enforcing. Why there is so much hate directed at Hispanics et al who just come to work hard and better their lives.

If I was in power, I would find it extremely hard not to have pretty much open borders, allowing for obvious security requirements.

Can you imagine a pedophile sheriff with the same thought process as yours? He's not going to arrest any pedophiles for raping children because he thinks the law is silly and thinks all pedophiles should have free range to do what they want.

This goes for any other sheriff who wants to interpret any law and enforce or not enforce any law he wants.
 

PirateKing

█▀█▀█ █ &#9608
It's good to know that cops are sometimes able to follow their own moral compass.
 

Facetious

Moderated
Racists :

"We're here today to show L.A., show the minority people here, the Anglo-Saxons, that we are here, the majority, we're here to stay. We do the work in this city, we take care of the spoiled brat children, we clean their offices, we pick the food, we do the manufacturing in the factories of L.A., we are the majority here and we are not going to be pushed around. We're here in Westwood, this is the fourth time we've been here in the last two months, to show white Anglo-Saxon Protestant L.A., the few of you who remain, that we are the majority, and we claim this land as ours, it's always been ours, and we're still here, and none of the talk about deporting. If anyone's going to be deported it's going to be you! Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Woodland Hills! Go back to Boston! To back to the Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You're old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you, leave like beaten rats. You old white people, it is your duty to die. Even their own ethicists say that they should die, that they have a duty to die. They're taking up too much space, too much air. We are the majority in L.A. There's over seven million Mexicans in L.A. County alone. We are the majority. And you're going to see every day more and more of it, as we manifest as our young people grow up, graduate from high school, go on to college and start taking over this society. The vast majority of our people are under the age of 15 years old. Right now we're already controlling those elections, whether it's by violence or nonviolence. Through love of having children we're going to take over." Other demonstrators: "Raza fuerza (brown race power), this is Aztlan, this is Mexico. They're the pilgrims on our land. Go back to the Nina, the Pinta, the Santa Maria."

- Augustin Cebada, Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers of Aztlan shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los Angeles, 7/4/96



"There's only two forms of power in this country and in this world. One is economic power, We certainly don't have the economic power because we don't own the means of production, but there's another form of power, and that's the power of the masses. So you can be as revolutionary as you want, you can be Chicano nationalist, you can be Mexican-American, you can be Hispanic, you can believe in the concept of Aztlan, you can believe in the concept of multi-culturalism. Somebody can say 'Everybody here is wrong, I am the only one that has reached revolutionary completeness'. But the bottom line is that if we do not mobilize our community we are not putting together a setting - the parameters to establish a massive movement in our community. That's what this is about. And that's why I am here today - to talk about who here wants to organize the masses, and who here is interested in developing that movement that somebody earlier said that the sleeping giant is in a coma. I'll tell you that on October 16 ("Grande Marcha" against Prop. 187) 150,000 representatives from the sleeping giant were not in a coma but rather were marching down the streets of Los Angeles saying that enough is enough and we're no longer going to tolerate the racism against our community. The very essence of the dignity of our community is in danger right now. Luckily, we don't have to give our lives. We're not at that point, but we can give a little. What I would like to ask everybody here to give is not necessarily your life, but to give one moment of thought to what the importance of a national march on Washington DC in 1996 would mean for the mass movement of our community. Get ten people, ten people ready to go with us to that march to Washington DC in '96, and I guarantee you, just as we mobilized 150 (sic) people into the streets of Los Angeles on October 16, we can mobilize one million people and bring Washington to a standstill, and those rednecks that are out there making decisions for the betterment of their communities will think twice before they push forward anti-immigrant legislation against our community. And so that we can show our people that the time has come for us to come together on what brings us together instead of to sit down and bump heads. And I tell the students in the colleges, if you're still debating the question of whether they're Chicanos or Mexicanos, or Chicano/Mexicano, we're not learning from the lessons of ten, fifteen years ago. The time has come for unity - there's too many things that separate people, but we have to begin to look at what brings us together. And so I ask everybody here, how many of you agree if we can leave here with one thing today, that in 1996 we are going to Washington DC on a mass mobilization there to bring Washington to a standstill so that they know that we're there and that we begin to put into place those things that are necessary to insure that we advance the interests of our community. Raise your hands, those of you that agree with what I'm saying."

- Fabian Nunez, (whose son is a murderer) formerly Alliance for Immigrant Rights, political liaison for L.A. School District, currently Speaker of the CA Assembly at Latino Summit at UC Riverside, 1/1995
 

PirateKing

█▀█▀█ █ &#9608
Your okay with a pedophile sheriff following their own moral compass as well?
facepalmhy2.gif
The pedophile sheriff argument is a bit redundant. And what if a sheriff was obligated to enforce a segregation law? You know, like they did in the south? Just because it's a law doesn't mean its not fubar.
 
It's amazing to see someone here comparing and equating pedophilia with institutionalized racism :rolleyes:

Racists :

"We're here today to show L.A., show the minority people here, the Anglo-Saxons, that we are here, the majority, we're here to stay. We do the work in this city, we take care of the spoiled brat children, we clean their offices, we pick the food, we do the manufacturing in the factories of L.A., we are the majority here and we are not going to be pushed around. We're here in Westwood, this is the fourth time we've been here in the last two months, to show white Anglo-Saxon Protestant L.A., the few of you who remain, that we are the majority, and we claim this land as ours, it's always been ours, and we're still here, and none of the talk about deporting. If anyone's going to be deported it's going to be you! Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Woodland Hills! Go back to Boston! To back to the Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You're old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you, leave like beaten rats. You old white people, it is your duty to die. Even their own ethicists say that they should die, that they have a duty to die. They're taking up too much space, too much air. We are the majority in L.A. There's over seven million Mexicans in L.A. County alone. We are the majority. And you're going to see every day more and more of it, as we manifest as our young people grow up, graduate from high school, go on to college and start taking over this society. The vast majority of our people are under the age of 15 years old. Right now we're already controlling those elections, whether it's by violence or nonviolence. Through love of having children we're going to take over." Other demonstrators: "Raza fuerza (brown race power), this is Aztlan, this is Mexico. They're the pilgrims on our land. Go back to the Nina, the Pinta, the Santa Maria."

- Augustin Cebada, Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers of Aztlan shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los Angeles, 7/4/96



"There's only two forms of power in this country and in this world. One is economic power, We certainly don't have the economic power because we don't own the means of production, but there's another form of power, and that's the power of the masses. So you can be as revolutionary as you want, you can be Chicano nationalist, you can be Mexican-American, you can be Hispanic, you can believe in the concept of Aztlan, you can believe in the concept of multi-culturalism. Somebody can say 'Everybody here is wrong, I am the only one that has reached revolutionary completeness'. But the bottom line is that if we do not mobilize our community we are not putting together a setting - the parameters to establish a massive movement in our community. That's what this is about. And that's why I am here today - to talk about who here wants to organize the masses, and who here is interested in developing that movement that somebody earlier said that the sleeping giant is in a coma. I'll tell you that on October 16 ("Grande Marcha" against Prop. 187) 150,000 representatives from the sleeping giant were not in a coma but rather were marching down the streets of Los Angeles saying that enough is enough and we're no longer going to tolerate the racism against our community. The very essence of the dignity of our community is in danger right now. Luckily, we don't have to give our lives. We're not at that point, but we can give a little. What I would like to ask everybody here to give is not necessarily your life, but to give one moment of thought to what the importance of a national march on Washington DC in 1996 would mean for the mass movement of our community. Get ten people, ten people ready to go with us to that march to Washington DC in '96, and I guarantee you, just as we mobilized 150 (sic) people into the streets of Los Angeles on October 16, we can mobilize one million people and bring Washington to a standstill, and those rednecks that are out there making decisions for the betterment of their communities will think twice before they push forward anti-immigrant legislation against our community. And so that we can show our people that the time has come for us to come together on what brings us together instead of to sit down and bump heads. And I tell the students in the colleges, if you're still debating the question of whether they're Chicanos or Mexicanos, or Chicano/Mexicano, we're not learning from the lessons of ten, fifteen years ago. The time has come for unity - there's too many things that separate people, but we have to begin to look at what brings us together. And so I ask everybody here, how many of you agree if we can leave here with one thing today, that in 1996 we are going to Washington DC on a mass mobilization there to bring Washington to a standstill so that they know that we're there and that we begin to put into place those things that are necessary to insure that we advance the interests of our community. Raise your hands, those of you that agree with what I'm saying."

- Fabian Nunez, (whose son is a murderer) formerly Alliance for Immigrant Rights, political liaison for L.A. School District, currently Speaker of the CA Assembly at Latino Summit at UC Riverside, 1/1995

I'm really proud to see you have finally mastered the art of copying, cutting and pasting so you can justify institutionalized racism, racial profiling, xenophobia and the violation of civil liberties with your twisted logic :rolleyes:
 

Facetious

Moderated
Good bloke.

Racist laws are not worth enforcing. Why there is so much hate directed at Hispanics et al who just come to work hard and better their lives.

If I was in power, I would find it extremely hard not to have pretty much open borders, allowing for obvious security requirements.

Oh, that's right, you're the one with the ''Foreign Relations'' degree. :hatsoff:
Opportunity Knocks ! :nanner: ;p
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
It's funny how the people that are always breaking the law, have to scream racism, as their only defense. I find it hard to believe that in Mexico, pasty white Anglo Saxons are screaming racism, and racial profiling when they're being investigated as to the reason they are in another country. The fact is, the people breaking the law, and committing crimes, and draining the system of resources ARE IN FACT, "brown skinned" people. Maybe not all of them are here illegally...and that's great, they followed the rules, and did it the right way...but some are, and they need to be dealt with, quickly, and harshly, and it appears to me, the only way to find out the information necessary, is to investigate them. So every time a cop has to do his job, he should have to fear the repercussions of a law suite, or disciplinary actions, for trying to do his job? He should be labeled a racist, because the people he's looking for are dark skinned, and he didn't waste time and money asking an equal number of light skinned people the same question? That's ridicules. We live in a different time now...it's sad, but it's true, racial profiling works. If you have evidence that a tattooed biker, with long, dark hair, is running a load of drugs across the country, in a red pick up truck...you don't stop an equal amount of short haired, blond nuns in 4 door sedans. Our Countries resources are stretched to their breaking points, and as a tax payer, I shouldn't have to pay more tax dollars so people in this country illegally, can have rights...OF ANY KIND. You don't follow the law, you get tossed out. In a day and age when people have harsh, radical political and religious beliefs, trust and understanding should be hard to come by. Personally, I think the entire Mexican border should be patrolled by the National Guard, and they should consider anyone crossing the border illegally, to be committing a terrorist act, and use the amount of force necessary to stop that threat....permanently.
 

Facetious

Moderated
It's amazing to see someone here comparing and equating pedophilia with institutionalized racism :rolleyes:



I'm really proud to see you have finally mastered the art of copying, cutting and pasting so you can justify :rolleyes:
''institutionalized racism, racial profiling, xenophobia and the violation of civil liberties with your twisted logic ? ''

Twisted logic ? All I was doing was demonstrating that racism, intolerance and bigotry are two way streets! :thumbsup:

Anyway, you should get away from this stuff for the day, maybe go bring mom a bouquet :thumbsup: This stuff get's sorta corrosive after a while. :2 cents:
 

Philbert

Banned
I'm glad this officer has spoken out against this racist law that violates the civil liberties of Brown skinned citizens

http://gawker.com/5527002/tucson-sheriff-wont-enforce-stupid-racist-new-immigration-law

Hey! Arizona still has good citizens left. Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik declared his refusal to comply with his state's ugly, xenophobic new law, calling it "humiliating" and "racist." Way to go, Dupnik! Too bad you will probably get sued.


Arizona recently passed a law giving the police broad powers to detain people they suspect of being in the country illegally. If you are thinking this sounds like some kind of xenophobic police-state bullshit essentially mandating racial profiling, well, you are thinking right.

But why take our word for it? Clarence Dupnik runs shit in Tucson and the surrounding area. He has been a cop for fifty goddamn years. And he thinks this law sucks, too:

Sheriff Clarence Dupnik calls SB 1070 "racist," "disgusting," and "unnecessary."
Speaking Tuesday morning with KGUN9's Steve Nunez, Dupnik made it clear that while he will not comply with the provisions of the new law, nor will he let illegal immigrants go free. "We're going to keep doing what we've been doing all along," Dupnik said. "We're going to stop and detain these people for the Border Patrol."
But here's the thing about Arizona's fun new no-Mexicans-allowed law: It's so stupid, Clarence can't actually keep doing his job the way he's supposed to. One of the law's provisions allows him to be sued if his constituents don't think he's complying.

The sheriff acknowledged that this course of action could get him hauled into court. SB 1070 allows citizens to sue any law enforcement official who doesn't comply with the law. But Dupnik told Nunez that SB 1070 would force his deputies to adopt racial profiling as an enforcement tactic, which Dupnik says could also get him sued. "So we're kind of in a damned if we do, damned if we don't situation. It's just a stupid law."
If we were Clarence Dupnik, we would quit. But we're not, thank God. See, Dupnik has a solution: "The November election."

I'm really proud to see you have finally mastered the art of copying, cutting and pasting so you can justify institutionalized racism, racial profiling, phobia and the violation of civil liberties with your twisted logic.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:



Your leader speaks...:rofl2:
 

Facetious

Moderated
On this side of the Mexican border they call you a racist for wanting to enforce the law of the land, on the Mexican side of the border they threaten to kill you for enforcing the law of the land, just ask Sheriff Joseph Arpaio.

I like 'ol Joe, he's got guts ! :hatsoff:
 
Laws like this shouldn't be passed in the first place, goes against what I believe the US stands for. If there is a huge public outcry then have a public referendum on whether to pass the law or not. However I don't believe law enforcement officers can pick and choose what laws to follow or disregard, it's not exactly as extreme as the Vietnam War when some troops were ordered by their commanders to shoot dead unarmed civilians, now that's a rule you disobey. The officer can just issue a short apology when stopping someone and explain what he is doing and make it as quick and dignified as possible, if he/she gives respect they'll get it back.
 
Top