trump's Coronavirus Failures and Lies

[gmase]

So you all think Trump makes decisions? That he has any power at all?
That he is not just a tool to create partisanship among The People? Which in turn turns you into a tool as well.
They've even used him to make the corona virus and lockdown of into a partisan issue among The People.
So everybody keep arguing over Trump because if you were ever going to figure it out I suppose you would have done so by now.

Trump makes comments based on who talked to him most recently. Talk to Parkland families: "Yes, we will pass gun control." Talk to NRA: "No, there will be no control." Frankly, he is learning it was easier to be sitting on the sidelines criticizing than fighting in the arena. His press conferences are nothing beyond poor television and fodder for comedians. But, that wasn't your question.

He makes decisions in a like manner: listening to the sycophants sitting next to him. He has the power, but is choosing to yield it in an inconsistent and reckless manner. Then we're back to the elusive 'They' - whatever that really means.

You are correct, we should not be focused on Trump. We should be focused on front-line staffs, infectious disease controls, cures, and treatments.

 

[gmase]

I think the only reason Trump is President is because the Deep State knew they wouldn’t be able to carry out their NWO agenda with Hillary Clinton at the wheel. Too many people were onto her. He’s just a distraction while they make their final chess move.

What is the final move? Why now? And who is making it? I was under the impression Trump was the anti-NWO guy. Hillary, via her connection to the Comet Ping Pong, is deep into the NWO.

 

[meesterperfect]

I think the only reason Trump is President is because the Deep State knew they wouldn’t be able to carry out their NWO agenda with Hillary Clinton at the wheel. Too many people were onto her. He’s just a distraction while they make their final chess move.

I have been sayingt that since early 2017, but I suspected it may be the case early on.
Trump is the perfect Divide and Conquer PREZ. That is why they installed him.
Ok sure in a real election he would have won no problem, but they could have just as easily told us Trump won in 2016.
If they had done this, told us Hiliary won, it would have woke a lot of people up to the fact that the elections for PREZ are bogus.
Almost everybody would have figured it out had she "won". Enough people, especially younger people had already began to awake from their slumber when they rigged it against Sanders (who is no innocent victim either) right before they went home to their parents houses where they get free food and board, can be on their mothers car insurance policy and be part of their cell phone family plan.

BUT!, they started with the divide and conquer stuff immediately by telling The People that Hiliary actually had more votes.
Then to create more divisiveness they told us Russia rigged the elections for Trump. Right out of the gate, literally day 1 it began.

Now if they appointed Hiliary as PREZ the only way to achieve anywhere near a Trumptonian level of divisiveness would be for the MEDIA to go against her, a poor old lady who has dedicated her life to helping people.
No way that would ever happen and it really wouldn't be very effective either.
With Trump they could also manipulate people with mainly conservative dispositions who don't trust their government.
They did the same to Black people with Barry Sotoero, the previous Actor in Chief.
So yes, Trump is PREZ for a reason.

And if Hiliary came so close in 2016 surely she would win in 2020. Yet she is nowhere to be found.

 

[BCT]

What is the final move? Why now? And who is making it? I was under the impression Trump was the anti-NWO guy. Hillary, via her connection to the Comet Ping Pong, is deep into the NWO.

The rich one percent want to depopulate our rising population and control the rest with an Orwellian Police State. Check out the Georgia Guidestones, very creepy. They have to maintain there power and they are scared. So they remove all of our rights with a pandemic and leave us all sitting ducks for Martial Law, you better research this stuff quick, they are taking away the internet soon to silence us.

 

[meesterperfect]

What is the final move? Why now? And who is making it? I was under the impression Trump was the anti-NWO guy. Hillary, via her connection to the Comet Ping Pong, is deep into the NWO.

I don't know if there is a final move. To qoute Journey , "Oh, the movie never ends, It goes on and on, and on, and on".
Its a never ending show just like a soap opera. And Trump is no anti anything and comet pizza was a honeypot, it was bullshit.
Of course it still being used to herd conservative types who don't trust the GOV or its media down a dead end hallway.
Who you ask? I don't have their names and addresses but to deny their is a hierarchy in this world is very naive. I can assure you Trump and Pelosi, Shumer, Feinstein, Obamas, ect are not anywhere near at the top of it.

Trump makes comments based on who talked to him most recently. Talk to Parkland families: "Yes, we will pass gun control." Talk to NRA: "No, there will be no control." Frankly, he is learning it was easier to be sitting on the sidelines criticizing than fighting in the arena. His press conferences are nothing beyond poor television and fodder for comedians. But, that wasn't your question.

He makes decisions in a like manner: listening to the sycophants sitting next to him. He has the power, but is choosing to yield it in an inconsistent and reckless manner. Then we're back to the elusive 'They' - whatever that really means.

You are correct, we should not be focused on Trump. We should be focused on front-line staffs, infectious disease controls, cures, and treatments.

I was going to say this in your previous comment earlier today but I'll say it now.
How do Defense lawyers get guilty clients off? The best way is to confuse the heck out of the jury with all kinds of possibilities so they don't know what the heck to believe. This often results in an acquittal. OJ, Casey Anthony, Robert Blake, are good examples.
Throw as much bullcrap , contradictory information out there as possible to confuse everybody so they don't know what the hell to think and then begin fighting with each other over which possibility is the truth.
This is the tactic the Government and its controlled media use on The People every single day. And the media is controlled. It is part of the government now, has been for a long time. Its nothing less than a Ministry of Propaganda against the people, and its completely legal.
They do the same with all the post 2012 MASS KILLINGS that you believe in so much, even though you have never seen 1 actual dead body or one actual tear drop. Newtown, Pulse, Vegas, Parkland, ect........throw as much contradictory information out there as possible, confuse the hell out of everybody, get them fighting each other over it , and sit back, watch and reap.

And thats all I have to say about that.
Of course if some people can't get beyond the term "they" I guess there is no reason to try to convince them. Best letting them keep on thinking Trump, Obama, Biden, Pence, Pelosi, Shumer, Feinstein, and the rest are the ones actually in charge.

 

[gmase]

I don't know if there is a final move. To qoute Journey , "Oh, the movie never ends, It goes on and on, and on, and on".
Its a never ending show just like a soap opera. And Trump is no anti anything and comet pizza was a honeypot, it was bullshit.
Of course it still being used to herd conservative types who don't trust the GOV or its media down a dead end hallway.
Who you ask? I don't have their names and addresses but to deny their is a hierarchy in this world is very naive. I can assure you Trump and Pelosi, Shumer, Feinstein, Obamas, ect are not anywhere near at the top of it.

I was going to say this in your previous comment earlier today but I'll say it now.
How do Defense lawyers get guilty clients off? The best way is to confuse the heck out of the jury with all kinds of possibilities so they don't know what the heck to believe. This often results in an acquittal. OJ, Casey Anthony, Robert Blake, are good examples.
Throw as much bullcrap , contradictory information out there as possible to confuse everybody so they don't know what the hell to think and then begin fighting with each other over which possibility is the truth.
This is the tactic the Government and its controlled media use every single day. And the media is controlled. It is part of the government now, has been for a long time. Its nothing less than a Ministry of Propaganda against the people, and its completely legal.
They do the same with all the post 2012 MASS KILLINGS that you believe in so much, even though you have never seen 1 actual dead body or one actual tear drop. Newtown, Pulse, Vegas, Parkland, ect........throw as much contradictory information out there as possible, confuse the hell out of everybody, get them fighting each other over it , and sit back and watch.

And thats all I have to say about that.
Of course if some people can't get beyond the term "they" I guess there is no reason to try to convince them. Best letting them keep on think Trump, Obama, Biden, Pence, Pelosi, Shumer, Feinstein, and the rest are the ones actually in charge.

Confusing the heck out of people sounds like a few of these posts. The plot has so many twists and turns it is very difficult to follow. Especially when you insert the so-called Controlled Opposition. You're correct about defense attorneys and throwing shit at juries.

You're correct again about power. Money/wealth will buy power. All those you name are trying to keep their power by helping their constituents (however they are defined).

You lose me at the fabricated shootings. I live near where a couple of them happened (one pre-2012) and am acquainted with people impacted by them. In fact I'm acquainted with two impacted by Newtown.

 

[gmase]

The rich one percent want to depopulate our rising population and control the rest with an Orwellian Police State. Check out the Georgia Guidestones, very creepy. They have to maintain there power and they are scared. So they remove all of our rights with a pandemic and leave us all sitting ducks for Martial Law, you better research this stuff quick, they are taking away the internet soon to silence us.

Why not just do it the old-fashioned way with a World War*? They even slipped in a bonus pandemic at the end of the Great War.

* With the recent tensions with Iran, this is a also possibility.

 

[gmase]

Good thing you're light years ahead of me and thinking about this on a different level because I can't keep your narrative straight.

The simplest formula I can deduce: everyone = bad

 

[gmase]

Dr. Trump opining about the fall: https://www.oann.com/president-trum...-not-return-with-the-same-strength-if-at-all/

Unfortunately, he's just entertainment at this point. He said it would be done at 15 cases going to -0-, it would be over by April, ... hell, just read Mongo18's first post for all of the wisdom spewed from the Presidential Apprentice.

Some insight from way too long ago: It's true we are immune, when fact is fiction and TV reality

 

[BCT]

Why not just do it the old-fashioned way with a World War*? They even slipped in a bonus pandemic at the end of the Great War.

* With the recent tensions with Iran, this is a also possibility.

Theyre not necessary anymore, they used wars to keep everyone broke and in fear. Wars are old hat, pandemics are in now. They have everyone locked up in their houses terrified. No need for fake wars anymore. Just have the media keep pushing fear with this fake pandemic and scare them into a poisonous vaccine. After that they will have total control. They want to turn humans into robots basically.

 

[gmase]

Theyre not necessary anymore, they used wars to keep everyone broke and in fear. Wars are old hat, pandemics are in now. They have everyone locked up in their houses terrified. No need for fake wars anymore. Just have the media keep pushing fear with this fake pandemic and scare them into a poisonous vaccine. After that they will have total control. They want to turn humans into robots basically.

Fortunately we have people like Timothy Wilson keeping watch?
https://thehill.com/policy/national...uring-investigation-into-plot-to-bomb-medical

It seems like the fear is hitting everyone.

 

[BCT]

Fortunately we have people like Timothy Wilson keeping watch?
https://thehill.com/policy/national...uring-investigation-into-plot-to-bomb-medical

It seems like the fear is hitting everyone.

This plan was created by brilliant men, nobody should feel too bad for getting fooled.

 

[meesterperfect]

Theyre not necessary anymore, they used wars to keep everyone broke and in fear. Wars are old hat, pandemics are in now. They have everyone locked up in their houses terrified. No need for fake wars anymore. Just have the media keep pushing fear with this fake pandemic and scare them into a poisonous vaccine. After that they will have total control. They want to turn humans into robots basically.

Very well said, but the wars, invasions and attacks since 2001 were very real. Just ask any Libyan, Iraqi, or Syrian.
But you are very correct I feel. Fear is pretty powerful stuff.
Please begin watching at about 14:30 in, I promise you will not regret it.

he's got video of Central Park. Everybody wearing masks and staring at their little phones. Reminds me of the scene from Terminator 2 when John Conner says, " We're not gonna make it. are we?".

 

[BCT]

Very well said, but the wars, invasions and attacks since 2001 were very real. Just ask any Libyan, Iraqi, or Syrian.
But you are very correct I feel. Fear is pretty powerful stuff.
Please begin watching at about 14:30 in, I promise you will not regret it.

he's got video of Central Park. Everybody wearing masks and staring at their little phones. Reminds me of the scene from Terminator 2 when John Conner says, " We're not gonna make it. are we?".

Oh the invasions and attacks are real but the boogeymen they are fighting aren’t. They fund their own boogeymen. It’s just a bunch of rich people showing off their new toys to one another in a friendly exhibition.

And yes the scene from T2 is correct. “It’s in our nature to destroy ourselves”. When madmen are in control the world can only end in tears.

 

[meesterperfect]

Oh the invasions and attacks are real but the boogeymen they are fighting aren’t. They fund their own boogeymen. It’s just a bunch of rich people showing off their new toys to one another in a friendly exhibition.

And yes the scene from T2 is correct. “It’s in our nature to destroy ourselves”. When madmen are in control the world can only end in tears.

Oh no doubt the premises for all the attacks were based on nothing but lies of course. And Al Quaeada and ISIs are boogeymen used to scare and manipulate us. I've posted tons of stuff about isis right here on freeones.
See I don't think its in the nature of people in general to destroy ourselves. Most people around the world are good peace loving people. Don't judge just by the people in the USA who mostly are spoiled to an extent. In most countries especially the ones we were told are the worst, the people are usually the nicest. Its just the ones in control. I suppose unfortunately to get to a certain level of power you have to be somewhat of a psychopath, therefore the world is run by insane people.

And like I said many times there are 2 kinds of people, those who take the safe way through life and cower behind a bullys and those who stand up to them who many times wind up on the losing end. The great majority seem to choose the 1st option.
There are almost 8 billion of us and maybe a few thousand of them, but we never stand up as a group. I guess the fact that they control most of the worlds information we get is a big factor.

It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.

Henry Ford

 

[Johan]

There are almost 8 billion of us and maybe a few thousand of them, but we never stand up as a group.

Some did :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Communist_Revolution
Etc...

 

[meesterperfect]

Some did :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Communist_Revolution
Etc...

Yes technically you are right I guess, but I believe those are huge examples of people forced to have to choose a side and pray that side comes out on top. I'm not educated enough on Cuba or China but I believe in Russia they were way better off with the Czar, except for the jews. I think most Russians were still in favor of the Czar during that time but couldn't do anything. All are good examples of my 'Psychopaths" theory.
Maybe thats one good thing about monarchies, the people don't defnitely get psycopaths in power. Some kings were actually good. If for any reason to keep the people from revolting. Of course in those days the people had the same type of arms and weapons as the "governments". In todays world its rocks against tanks and teargas.

 

[gmase]

Look at the current 'monarchies' who actually wield power today. Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Syria, et al. I would hardly call them pictures of stability.

History has shown that power consolidated in one person is rarely a good idea. The list is endless and makes our form of government look wonderful. As Winston Churchill said, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except all of the others." (Yes, I know we're a republic.)

Beating the horse dead:

 

[meesterperfect]

Well, Whats wrong with Syria's leader? Doesn't like getting bombed on a daily basis and getting blamed for gas attacks on his own people? Doesn't like getting him and his and his family's lives threarened with death is he doesn't leave his country? Kinda hard for a country to be stable when its getting bombed into the stone age every day for years.
And he was elected by the people. Syria is not a monarchy.
I'm beginning to think you go against me on some things just to pass time or something.
Was I wrong? There has never been any good Kings or Emporers in the past?
Of course there has been. Some good for their own people only and some good for their people and their neighbors.
I agree most were probably evil bastards currently burning in Hell but there were some good ones in the mix.
My thought was that the odds of a good leader coming from a monarchy is probably greater than other forms where in order to succeed to the "top" you have to be corrupt and soul-less. In those systems they are almost all bad.
And Churchill? The mass murderer of civilians around the world? I wouldn't quote him.

 

[gmase]

Well, Whats wrong with Syria's leader? Doesn't like getting bombed on a daily basis and getting blamed for gas attacks on his own people? Doesn't like getting him and his and his family's lives threarened with death is he doesn't leave his country? Kinda hard for a country to be stable when its getting bombed into the stone age every day for years.
And he was elected by the people. Syria is not a monarchy.
I'm beginning to think you go against me on some things just to pass time or something.
Was I wrong? There has never been any good Kings or Emporers in the past?
Of course there has been. Some good for their own people only and some good for their people and their neighbors.
I agree most were probably evil bastards currently burning in Hell but there were some good ones in the mix.
My thought was that the odds of a good leader coming from a monarchy is probably greater than other forms where in order to succeed to the "top" you have to be corrupt and soul-less. In those systems they are almost all bad.
And Churchill? The mass murderer of civilians around the world? I wouldn't quote him.

I will stand corrected, but please forgive my oversight. His father ruled from 1971-2000 and he assumed power when his father died. It was certainly hereditary.

We just disagree - I don't need to make anything up. You showed your hand (and answered my question about who you think 'they' are) when you responded to Johan. I wonder why you focused on the jews as the oppressed people in czarist Russia and why you seem to know more about the Russian Revolution than the other two. The antipathy toward Churchill is just the cherry on top. It's a classic view - not very original at all. [But we're digressing from Trump's Coronavirus Failures and Lies.]