NameThatPornstar pisses me off a lot.-Check it up against namethatpornstar.com
-Look for any logo in the scene/picture
-If a video, try googling the title, the clip might have been published elsewhere, containing IDs
have you tried my site?NameThatPornstar pisses me off a lot.
- That damn CAPTCHA doesn't work half the time and you have to redo it.
- Sometimes the image submit doesn't work. I can submit a pic and it doesn't work, but when I try Google, it sometimes finds the pic on there.
I learned that one a long time ago. The term, "name" is my favorite. "freeones" and "namethatpornstar" aren't bad if you think the image has been requested before.- sometimes you can get good finds just searching with some keywords in google images...
I don't know what site that is, and don't post it. FreeOnes has a rule prohibiting members from promoting their site(s).have you tried my site?
It would be better if more members would contribute something. I'm thinking about just deleting this...Very interesting and useful thread. Thanks.
I hadn't even thought about videos, because I rarely even try (that is I rarely don't try to help others) to ID requests from video(s), because I'm not good at finding ID's from videos.This may be obvious but was a query earlier this week for models in a music video, with two screenshots in the post. Simply googling "music video [artist] and the word "models" yielded the info in the top three or four search results.
Reverse Image Search(ing) is probably your best option.Any tips for finding amateurs? For instance, I'm trying to find a woman that has strictly done boob drops and flashing. There are a couple videos of the same poster, but she is strictly amateur (not even a camgirl).
I do that sometimes myself, but I use "thenude" as a search criteria instead of "nude.eu".Googling the model's name and the gallery's title with 'indexxx' or 'nude.eu' helps me with aliases (especially those using one-letter surnames).
Flipping a watermark logo on a copyrighted image is a no-no. My meaning here; that's the words, "Brazzers, Naughty America, Bang Bros., Mofos, Wicked, Digital Playground, Playboy, Met-Art, etc." since that's considered questionable. Courts have ruled in favor of the content creators against sites and even uploaders. Because why flip the image in the first place? The uploader is trying to get one past the site moderators and admins where he's uploading to. Cropped images, taking the site logo off the picture, leads to other issues. It's bad but tolerable. And xhamster and other sites are allowed to have them in their inventory. What's really worse? An old and now defunct website, lazygirls.info ran into controversy and eventually lost lawsuits to photographers of copyrighted content years ago. Photographers brought class action lawsuits in California, Texas, Florida, Illinois, Ohio, New York, New Jersey, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Louisiana among other places where other adult photographers could join the suit. LG would scrub the photographer's site logo off the picture and put the lazygirls.info logo right onto the picture. You can't do that either.Here's a couple of tricks:
- Lately, I've noticed people submitting pics that have been altered with a caption added to the bottom. Googling it finds nothing, but cropping the caption off the bottom will get results.
- And, this week I saw two people submit pics that had been "flipped" (the watermark was reversed). Google shows nothing, but using a photo editor to reverse the image helped get results.
Flipping a picture, watermark or not, seems pointless. In the age of RIS, it certainly hinders ID efforts, but I've found that it happens a lot. As the old saying goes, you can't fix stupid.Flipping a watermark logo on a copyrighted image is a no-no. My meaning here; that's the words, "Brazzers, Naughty America, Bang Bros., Mofos, Wicked, Digital Playground, Playboy, Met-Art, etc." since that's considered questionable. Courts have ruled in favor of the content creators against sites and even uploaders. Because why flip the image in the first place? The uploader is trying to get one past the site moderators and admins where he's uploading to. Cropped images, taking the site logo off the picture, leads to other issues. It's bad but tolerable. And xhamster and other sites are allowed to have them in their inventory. What's really worse? An old and now defunct website, lazygirls.info ran into controversy and eventually lost lawsuits to photographers of copyrighted content years ago. Photographers brought class action lawsuits in California, Texas, Florida, Illinois, Ohio, New York, New Jersey, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Louisiana among other places where other adult photographers could join the suit. LG would scrub the photographer's site logo off the picture and put the lazygirls.info logo right onto the picture. You can't do that either.
I've seen videos at xhamster and xvideos where the uploader has edited, blocked or pixelated the site logo off the video. That tells me that the uploader is trying to pull a fast one by uploading altered content. By the way, that would also be considered stolen content. And if the webmaster/webmistress of the site that it was pulled from found out, he or she would want them to take it down. Now xvideos gets more take down requests than xhamster. You'll see "Video was deleted at xvideos" more times than not.
You can use reverse image search engines. For me, Yandex seems to be the most reliable. With Tineye, the change in Google search criteria, i.e. dropping potential copyrighted infringed images from the search, has adversely impacted Tineye. Five or ten years ago, Tineye would come back with pages and pages of results. Put that same image in Tineye now, zero results.
Using a reverse image search, if the picture has a smutty.com or sex.com caption at the bottom, it may lead to an identification at those sites. Members seem to be quite knowledgeable over at those two places. If it comes back in an imgur result best to avoid it altogether because they'd want you to verify your information before you could view any adult content. If it comes back in a Pinterest result. Best to disregard all of them. People who post pictures onto their boards on Pinterest are really clueless. Then Pinterest has the gall to say that an image uploaded to their site is theirs. And they can do what they want with it. That may lead to being banned over there to the uploader/pinner for showing ladies naked from the waist down. You cannot do that -- show naked models below the waist -- over there at Pinterest.
As for namethatpornstar.com ... you can have a picture of Rachel Roxxx. You know it's Rachel Roxxx. Everyone else in the world knows it's Rachel Roxxx. However, the NTP website administrators want links with the pornstar's name, other pornstars who may be in the scene, the name of scene, etc and/or other corroborating evidence in order to get points. The more points you get, the closer you get it to calling it correct. Once it's correct, then it is solved.
It won't work. 99.999% of those who join never have the thought, "I need to read the rules.". They just go off and do their thing.Hi guys you really should bring a new rule in the ID section.
I mean is really annoying to see thread with only links, you have to click on it, and sometimes you got virus from this shity post.
People should always have to insert a pictures in their post.
Here's a perfect exemple
https://board.freeones.com/threads/another-hot-compliation.987736/#post-10868731
It took only two minutes to take these screenshot, everyone can make it on windows or iOS, no excuse for it.
We would like to make it clear that you can still post new ID request threads, you just have to click through to the new BETA sections at the top of the page.
Posting fresh queries in the "old" sections has been disabled for the duration of this trial. Some people seem to think they can't post threads at all, which is not the case.
If the experiment is a success, you won't need to keep clicking into it because all threads will then become one section, so don't use what is a minor inconvenience for now as a reason not to like it because it won't always be this way!
For more info, please click here.
Thank you!