Things in porn that turn you off INSTANTLY.
- Thread starter digifruitella
- Start date
Licking guys ass and feet, cages, anything disgusting like scat or puke, too aggresive facefuck, overflow of saliva/spit, sissies, crosdressing, trans.
monkeyspanky45
Banned
queen of spades who secretly want to hookup with BWC actors
Recognizing a director who asks in an interview with female performers, "do the Jews run Hollywood?" I boycott any title directed by that person.
Yeah, you can fuck off with this racist shit as well.
Is this a common thing? I've never run across this before.
In my humble opinion, this "thing" is common. It's a disease, passed down from one generation to another, from father to son, from mother to daughter The only cure for this disease is unconditional love and unconditional compassion. Why anyone would ask that question right before a celebration of people showing the primal energy and beauty of the human form is beyond me.
Fake talk / coming / squirting.
The camera work & lighting on material released by the likes of Tu$hy & Bl@cked is incredible but as soon as the women try to act turned on it's a massive turn off.
There seems to be a list of 20 phrases you can say, all of which sound completely fake. If they'd just shut up and do what comes naturally it'd be so much better.
Same as when they fake an orgasm or get a sneaky off-camera injection of water (or just piss themselves) to simulate squirting. Nope.
This is why I prefer a lot more amateur stuff these days. The video standard has hugely improved & it's generally so much more realistic.
At least directors like Pierre Woodm@n get this, which is more than can be said for most of the others.
The camera work & lighting on material released by the likes of Tu$hy & Bl@cked is incredible but as soon as the women try to act turned on it's a massive turn off.
There seems to be a list of 20 phrases you can say, all of which sound completely fake. If they'd just shut up and do what comes naturally it'd be so much better.
Same as when they fake an orgasm or get a sneaky off-camera injection of water (or just piss themselves) to simulate squirting. Nope.
This is why I prefer a lot more amateur stuff these days. The video standard has hugely improved & it's generally so much more realistic.
At least directors like Pierre Woodm@n get this, which is more than can be said for most of the others.
Why are you doing this?
Oh yeah, ha! Habit, I guess, from posting links to stuff on other forums.
John_8581
FreeOnes Lifetime Member
I was just over at RK. ^This ...
Autumn Falls and Sean Lawless in a Reality Kings Network sneakysex.com photoset called, "Going Down"
https://www.iafd.com/title.rme/id=b9f25c35-a607-49b2-888a-3e26191a73f6
In both the softcore and hardcore photos [attached.] - Mindgeek just somehow forgets to put the Reality Kings logo onto their photos.
Why are the photos being displayed like this? This is pretty much encouraging piracy by not putting the RK logo onto these photos.
And it's not just at Reality Kings. I've seen photos at Brazzers, Digital Playground, Twistys (after the acquisition by Manwin), Mofos and Babes too all without the website logos. It's just bad business.
Twistys before the acquisition - Shap, Twistys founder, would display demo photographs on occasion without the logo. Many of those photosets, without the Twistys logo, ended up either at Glamour Models Gone Bad, or at Scotty Jx's Actiongirls website with the appropriate GMGB or AG logos embeded on them. Scotty Jx would purchase sets from Twistys or from the photographers themselves so that he could buildup the ActionGirls network.
Autumn Falls and Sean Lawless in a Reality Kings Network sneakysex.com photoset called, "Going Down"
https://www.iafd.com/title.rme/id=b9f25c35-a607-49b2-888a-3e26191a73f6
In both the softcore and hardcore photos [attached.] - Mindgeek just somehow forgets to put the Reality Kings logo onto their photos.
Why are the photos being displayed like this? This is pretty much encouraging piracy by not putting the RK logo onto these photos.
And it's not just at Reality Kings. I've seen photos at Brazzers, Digital Playground, Twistys (after the acquisition by Manwin), Mofos and Babes too all without the website logos. It's just bad business.
Twistys before the acquisition - Shap, Twistys founder, would display demo photographs on occasion without the logo. Many of those photosets, without the Twistys logo, ended up either at Glamour Models Gone Bad, or at Scotty Jx's Actiongirls website with the appropriate GMGB or AG logos embeded on them. Scotty Jx would purchase sets from Twistys or from the photographers themselves so that he could buildup the ActionGirls network.
Last edited:
I hate and I'm instantly turned off by:
Overly large boobs! The smaller the boobs, the sexier they are!!
Overweight actresses. I'm actually scarred of fat girls!
Seeing male faces! I have no objection to cocks, but I don't want to ever see a dude's face, while I'm... err... wanking.
Overly large boobs! The smaller the boobs, the sexier they are!!
Overweight actresses. I'm actually scarred of fat girls!
Seeing male faces! I have no objection to cocks, but I don't want to ever see a dude's face, while I'm... err... wanking.
I agree but on 1 exception..... college school jawns in tube socks & sneakers butt naked
Unidentified male talent. Headless wonders. It's a given for most POV titles, granted, unless one can identify the male talent by his junk. Good luck with that. Some companies and vendors make a good effort trying to include the names of the male talent. Otherwise, if I am unable to identify the male talent, I'm not buying the content.
Touching on what @Captaingault said, I'm also not a fan of piercings. Especially on women who have great tits, but go and pierce their nipples. Angel Wicky is a good example. She's one of my favs and has amazing boobs, but the barbells through the nipples just doesn't do it for me.
Similar threads
- Locked
