Legzman
what the fuck you lookin at?
Population control! :thumbsup:
*clears throat*
Like I said ^^^
no debate needed!
Population control! :thumbsup:
I suppose this is my view. If you can commit a crime so grievious as taking someone's life in cold blooded or thoughtless (gangbangers) ******, then you veto your right to life. Why should you be able to sit in jail, cashing in on your right to live when you so coldly took that right away from someone else?
I know I may sound cold hearted on some issues, but there are just some crimes where the guilty shouldn't get to breath another blessed breath.
Dran right, you take a life you sould have to give up yours.
So the judge who gives out the death sentence on that person should also be given a death sentence too by another judge and so on. Great way of ending the human race as the last person has to commit suicide, as there is no one left to punish them for taking the life of another.
Handing out the death sentence makes you just as bad as the person in the dock. Plus it is something you can't undo when new evidence comes to light proving the person innocent. Hence why Britain got rid of it. As there was too many cases that they had ****** a innocent person.
I'm not sure that reasoning stands up. By analogy, the judge who has a criminal imprisoned for unlawfully holding a person prisoner against their will is also deserving of jail time.
Judges are given special authority by society to decree punitive measures that others are not. There is a difference between unlawful imprisonment and incarceration that is the outcome of a fair trial. The same distinction applies to ****** and capital punishment, whether one agrees with the death penalty or not.
His statement...
Dran right, you take a life you sould have to give up yours.
Which rightly breaks down to a person taking the life of another should there for have his taken. Which is exactly what the judge is doing, so there for should live by the same law/rule.
But again I'll ask this question I always ask when these threads start...
Isn't the person issuing a death sentence just doing the same as the person in the dock who ******** someone. That been ending a life?
So IMO makes them no better than the person in the dock. As they have the same mind set to be able to do it.
I believe in the death penalty, I believe in what God has to say about ******.. "Whoso sheddeth man's *****, by man shall his ***** be shed: for in the image of God made he man." What is this three strikes and you're out garbage, it should be one strike and you're out.
This topic has been done to death!
Some has also been rush to judgement to convict anyone or someone in particular on scant evidence for political reasons or to calm people, (that the killer has been found), or even to satisfy public craving. It's still questionable that the Lindbergh baby was ****** by Bruno Hauptmann.
This topic has been done to death
Great point, so often the need to calm the public down results in an innocent being railroaded. Quick trial, happy campers all around but the real killer still out there.
Personal note....As for the Lindberg baby, I go with the 'parents did it' theory. He was an embarrassment to the ****** I think. High society sucks sometimes in the priorities they set and their what the people think crap. .![]()
A pun maybe?I am sure it has, here and on many boards. A repeat discussion of this with some new members here is better than the 30th "How many times do you masturbate in a day" or "Who is your top 20/10/5 favorite porn stars?"
:dunno: At least to my way of thinking.
LL