Well somebody's going to bring up the bible, so here goes. If we look in the biblical proceedures for convicting someone to death, it required two witnesses. Not the testimony that someone was or was not there or whether DNA matched etc., but actually saw the crime (or maybe progress toward the crime?) According to this, the 911 bombers or timothy mcveigh definitely would have been convicted, but alot of murders would go unsolved and we would have a lot of dead animals around to sate god's judgement. As a former christian, I do think it still has some validity( the eyewitness part, not the animal sacrifice), if you don't care enough to hide the massive wrong you're doing in murder, you have no respect for society as a whole or for having even an appearance of treating others well. I personally don't think other murderers should receive the death penalty, because they still have shame. They might deserve life-imprisonment, but not the death penalty. I think Texas does need to change its laws on this,to be more restrictive in what's allowed.