PlasmaTwa2
The Second-Hottest Man in my ******'s Basement
Here's a debate topic for all you smart and mature people on this board:
And what do you think? Personally, I'm all for allowing the commissioners to refuse to marry people on religious grounds. It's a strange phenomenon were we can allow members of minority languages in Canada to walk around carrying ceremonial knives and to take a break from work to pray, but when it comes to the largest-demographic in Canada we can't be bothered to allow them anything. It's completely assinine to think that a gay couple can ***** someone who is uncomfortable with their relationship to do anything and it is an invasion of their freedom.
So the question here really is this: Who's rights trump the other's?
Saskatchewan's highest court will rule Monday morning on whether provincial civil marriage commissioners can refuse to perform same-sex ceremonies on religious grounds.
The province asked the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal for advice on whether proposed legislation allowing commissioners to recuse themselves from performing same-sex marriages for religious reasons would be constitutional.
As a compromise, the proposed law would compel dissenting commissioners to provide gay or lesbian couples with a referral to a colleague who would conduct the marriage.
Read more: Premium Link Upgrade
And what do you think? Personally, I'm all for allowing the commissioners to refuse to marry people on religious grounds. It's a strange phenomenon were we can allow members of minority languages in Canada to walk around carrying ceremonial knives and to take a break from work to pray, but when it comes to the largest-demographic in Canada we can't be bothered to allow them anything. It's completely assinine to think that a gay couple can ***** someone who is uncomfortable with their relationship to do anything and it is an invasion of their freedom.
So the question here really is this: Who's rights trump the other's?