Some people just call it as they see it. Doesnt mean its bad, but sometimes its just the truth.
And such men just tell every woman (and most men), they can't tell the difference between curves of different types.
Some women are healthy, some women are unhealthy, at the same weights.
It's not just height, but width as well, even more so, as not all women can be thin as in "small width."
Supermodel
Kate Dillon is a perfect example, "The Next Cindy Crawford" as labeled to those of us in the late '80s/early '90s.
She was on top of the world as a teen, and we soon found out that her size 6 could not be maintained as she hit the hospital.
She emerged in her 20s as a size 16, and was shunned by everyone.
She tried many times to drop below a size 10, but she couldn't, it was
physically impossible.
She now runs a size 14 on a regular basis, healthy, fit, although not the smallest she could be (that would be a size 10-12).
But when you're not just 5'11", but also wide in figure, it's virtually impossible to fit in anything below a size 10 no matter how much you starve yourself.
I am
extremely picky when it comes to women, period.
I do
not like 9 out of 10 alleged "fatties" I see every day.
It's only that 1 out of 10 hourglass or stocky-apple that catches my eye.
And then it's another 1 out of 10 that have the width and bust-hips (not necessarily "large breasts" or "bubble butt") with sweet brunette profile that drives me.
I've always been like that and I always will be.
And people say they are "fat" all while I can totally dive into why the women that are the objects of my desire are uniquely beautiful.
So far all those that "call it like it is," there are us guys regularly get to sack women who are not-so-different than models like
Kate Dillon.
I wouldn't say she's huge or a bbw, but she would be on the thinner end of them. I think she's beautiful and extra curvey.
She is slender, just not "thin" as in "narrow width."
Doctors will tell you over and over, BMI is only good for women of common straight bone structures.
It totally does
not apply to women of spoon, apple and, much less, hourglass.
Hourglass women have repeatedly had the longest lifespan of women, statistically shown time and time again.
Why?
Doctors will repeatedly state that a good, quick test is how much the stomach/gut sticks out.
Over 1" is not healthy, it means the body cannot distribute weight well.
Hourglass women distribute weight into their womanly shapes far better than others.
Straight is the worst, and half of the women, really hits the stomach early on.
Spoon is over another quarter of women, goes all to the hips/ass, which some men like.
Apple is only 1/8th of women (at least Anglo-American), goes up to the chest/bust (not necessarily breast though).
Hourglass is less than 1/12th of women (at least Anglo-American) goes to both the hips/ass and chest/bust.
I think it's so stupid when some models starve themselves to aquire a certain image. Working out and dieting is different tho. I'd rather go eat some fast food and be happy. She looks happy with herself and cute
The question is always "health" and "fitness."
I dated many women early in high school that were "thin" and allegedly "fit" that had 1"+ of fat on their stomach (and they were in their mid-teens!).
Sure enough, they were not-so-thin within a decade later, much less coming on two decades now.
Meanwhile, some of the allegedly "porkers" I dated in high school are still very shapely, and oh-so-even-more-womanly now.
I went to my high school reunion and guys were like, "wow, didn't she get hot?!"
And I always answered, "she was just that hot in high school, just not boney like other women you wanted."
Sure, there are "fat" women, and I'll be the first to admit they are not the most healthy.
There are plenty of "straight" women and "spoon" (aka "pear" or what I call "bell") shaped women that just are not my bag at all, I don't care how good she looks in the face.
In fact, that is why I virtually like
no actresses at all, they are "straight" or "spoon" shaped.
It's extremely rare you get a "hourglass" woman as an actress, and the few that are in Hollywood are not even good examples of them.
I also like the "disqualified by height" non-model types, like stocky-apple women.
Oh man, I have been with so many stocky-apple women, including my wife, who looks much like
Devyn Devine.
Another stocky-apple woman that I totally crave is
Annie Swanson, among several others.
I really don't go for too many "big beautiful women" (BBW) that are large.
The majority are straight or spoon shaped, so they have no good proportion.
Only a select few are large, full and wide with a hourglass figure.
It's only a rare woman like
Maria Moore or
Laura Orsolya that really pull off the huge size and weight (although Laura is taller, supermodel-like, which helps).
I'll even be the first to admit that
Kerry Marie, while insanely beautiful with her Greek profile, and I love her wide, has reached an unhealthy weight where her gut hangs out way too far for her frame.
Even some hourglass women get too big for even their curvy form to handle.
As far as
Lindsey Ward here, full, wide, curvy, but healthy.
I lost my virginity to a size 10-12 gynmist, and she had 10x the energy of women I dated who were younger and size 4-6.
