damn she's a babe, my number 1 girl now
Looooool Wtf! What happened with her breast? :crying:
Shay's very far from retiring me thinks.
If anything her career is taking a twist, in terms of doing things she hasn't done before.
Have you seen the recent webcam vid's she's been doing?
Penetration anyone?
You Mind providing a link would like to see that
Great stuff! Thank you! I don't see any of the aforementioned aging or looseness.nice boobies again http://www.my-pornbase.com/5644-shay-laren-collection
Yes, of course it only examines one facet of the relationship. Of course, being physically attracted to someone and have a great sex life is still very important, especially over all the years you are sexually capable. It's called being a realist is not hollow. But go ahead, keep on judging me.lol I love the pontification in here. Phrases like "to experience Shay throughout her life, wow" prove to me that you not only know nothing about women, you know nothing about people in general. People who cheat are scumbags, I agree with that...but to suggest that men are lucky if they get to spend their life with an attractive women is a hollow statement and only examines one facet of the relationship.
Sounds like someone didn't evaluate everything, but now they are lecturing me? Interesting. I have one rule. I don't have make-up sex. I don't fuck when I'm mad. I don't let the wrong emotions dictate a good fucking. But go head, let me know I'm the one that's fucked up.Take it from me (as I'm sure plenty of you already know) being with a super hot chick that is a raging cunt is the worst.
True, physical beauty is eternal. When you find it, it's a hard-on of a lifetime. Make fun of me all you want if it makes you feel better. I honestly hope you find a "super hot chick" that isn't "a raging cunt."Shay is still hot even though she's filled out a little. I'm not sure about Profs babbling philosophist bullshit about all women aging majestically and becoming a droopy, wrinkled butterfly...but Shay is still a babe.
Far be it for a lurker like me to comment, but I don't think it's the point of view that is the issue, it's more of the self-righteous tone and condescending nature of how it comes across. Regardless of how you intend it to sound (or read). And sometimes the long-winded monologues about the nuances of the female form get in the way of what most people visiting the thread want, and that's to actually look at it.Honestly, I stopped responding in this thread, but some people are just going to have a problem regardless. Oh well, I guess I'm too happy and content for some.
You're not telling me anything I don't already know.Far be it for a lurker like me to comment, but I don't think it's the point of view that is the issue, it's more of the self-righteous tone and condescending nature of how it comes across. Regardless of how you intend it to sound (or read). And sometimes the long-winded monologues about the nuances of the female form get in the way of what most people visiting the thread want, and that's to actually look at it.
But that's just my take. I could be wrong. I'm not "judging". It's just an honest attempt at an objective observation.