Seraphim’s Signature of The Week (S.O.T.W)

[pussypoppa]

I'll cast the weekly nomination for SeraphiM!

grrr i wanted to nominate him, anyways iv got two to nominate so my first would be Undertaker...second one ill think of later

 

[Deeeze]

Definetly pussypoppa.Its simple but meaningful

 

[cabey]

My nomination goes to Iamforever, his 'Slayer' sig (designed and created by Dr Death) really is a terrific piece of art and animation combined.
I would give it a score of 9 1/2 out of 10.

 

[jod0565]

Have to agree with deeeze on this week's nom!

 

[D-rock]

I would like to nominate Deeeze this week. He almost got my vote last week.

 

[Iamforever]

ill go with pussypoppa's as well. even though i cant look at it for very long without getting teary-eyed.

 

[Deeeze]

Just found my second nomination.
KungFuDude with Da Bears...........even though I am a Cowboys fan

 

[Iamforever]

im sorry, but i want two votes. just look at what dr death created. id prefer if pussypoppa won because of the symbolism, but look at what the doc made. i cant fully decide.

 

[poggy]

im sorry, but i want two votes. just look at what dr death created. id prefer if pussypoppa won because of the symbolism, but look at what the doc made. i cant fully decide.

First you can't nominate or vote for your own or a sig you have made. Read the first post with the rules.

Second a lot of people aren't going to like what I say here, but tough.
IMO this contest is for the style and look of the sig, not the symbolism of it. Thats why you'll never find me nominating or voting for a sig on sentiment terms. This is why IMO pussypoppa's sig is not even in the contest, sorry.

 

[Iamforever]

no good. why cant pussypoppas be in the contest? thats not fair. i understand why i cant nominate my own, but why not his? sentiments or not? thats not right. he was nominated.

 

[SeraphiM]

no good. why cant pussypoppas be in the contest? thats not fair. i understand why i cant nominate my own, but why not his? sentiments or not? thats not right. he was nominated.

Poggy1 only gave his opinion on the matter, not stating a rule.

IMO this contest is for the style and look of the sig, not the symbolism of it. Thats why you'll never find me nominating or voting for a sig on sentiment terms. This is why IMO pussypoppa's sig is not even in the contest, sorry.

I normal do not nominate sigs, but I particulary stay away from making political statements in my sigs:2 cents:

 

[dave_rhino]

I cant see any political statements... just respect for the dead...

 

[poggy]

Second a lot of people aren't going to like what I say here, but tough.
IMO this contest is for the style and look of the sig, not the symbolism of it. Thats why you'll never find me nominating or voting for a sig on sentiment terms. This is why IMO pussypoppa's sig is not even in the contest, sorry.

.
I normal do not nominate sigs, but I particulary stay away from making political statements in my sigs:2 cents:

I cant see any political statements... just respect for the dead...

Let me clear this up.

I never mentioned political, I said as I've highlighted sentiment. But then again you could say political, sentimental or any kind of statement. What I'm getting at, it's the sig I vote on not what it says or stands for. I vote on the look.

The reason I wouldn't nominate or vote on pussypoppa's sig is simple. It's not original, Ive seen it on other boards and also as a header to web pages. Sorry pussypoppa :o

 

[Perilypos]

I would like to nominate D-Rock's signature:

http://board.freeones.com/member.php?u=20031

 

[SeraphiM]

I never mentioned political, I said as I've highlighted sentiment. But then again you could say political, sentimental or any kind of statement. What I'm getting at, it's the sig I vote on not what it says or stands for. I vote on the look.

I'm sorry, I miss spoke.

When I said political I meant anything that would cause a debate among others.

I believe Sigs should be fun and care free. :nanner:

of a homage to our favorite girls.

 

[cabey]

All that is as maybe but the fact is it was nominated and so therefore eligible for voting on, end of story.

Personally and on a lighter note i can't imagine anyones Sig other than Iamforever winning this week, its awesome imo.

Good luck to all the nominees anyway, there all great in different ways and I think art can be beautiful, thought provoking, symbolic, or just plain crazy, thats the majestic thing which art brings to us all who appreciate it.

 

[pussypoppa]

Let me clear this up.

I never mentioned political, I said as I've highlighted sentiment. But then again you could say political, sentimental or any kind of statement. What I'm getting at, it's the sig I vote on not what it says or stands for. I vote on the look.

The reason I wouldn't nominate or vote on pussypoppa's sig is simple. It's not original, Ive seen it on other boards and also as a header to web pages. Sorry pussypoppa :o

No Problem mate, iv just seen my sig has caused sum problems between members... so is it alright if i decide that i voluntarly pull myself out of this weeks votes?
No Hard Feelings, and thank you to those who have nominated me for this week but i dont want to take advantage of 9/11 just for a sig...if you know what i mean, but thanx for appreciating the sig

 

[Renegade1Oh]

Hey Lighten Up A Little People, We Have Fantastic Looking Gals, :thumbsup: Also Rock-N-Rollers, Goths, Animals or Critters, All Great Sigs!!! All Good Work & Time Spent!!! :thumbsup: And as SeraphiM said it's a Forum to be for Good Looking Gals Sig's!!! :thumbsup: So I Got To Yank A Little On SeraphiM's Chain A Little!!! I Have To Go With "pussypoppa" this week!!! Here's A Cold One SeraphiM :glugglug: Take Care All !!!

 

[member006]

Nomination -KING-

http://board.freeones.com/member.php?u=52561

You gotta love "bling"

I don't see voting list yet. So I'm confused.

 

[drdeath67]

My first nomination is for SeraphiM