September 11, 1973

georgez

Banned
jdb67 said:
Thats your opinion, my question was to Ed Penishands.... its easy to cut & paste an article.... Shit even I can do that!!!! This little Article he has shown us could be applied to dozens of countries of the last 100 years..... So I say once again..... whats your fucken point?????

simple... pinochet was good for the country. enough said.

not sure i follow u dude
 

Brino

Banned
georgez said:
brino, u "have nothin better to do dick", just tell me why u are on this thread

Why am I on this thread? Why are you on this thread? Why is anybody on this thread? Why does this thread even exist? There's no point to this thread? That's the problem. :2 cents:
 

georgez

Banned
Brino said:
Why am I on this threa/d? Why are you on this thread? Why is anybody on this thread? Why does this thread even exist? There's no point to this thread? That's the problem. :2 cents:

i'm on this thread cuase i'm clilean. u? can u like....fuck off
 

Brino

Banned
georgez said:
i'm on this thread cuase i'm clilean. u? can u like....fuck off

You know I have a problem with people who tell me to fuck off and apparently I have a problem with people named georges / georgez.

If your Chilean then tell me what the point of this thread is? Give me something besides "Pinochet Good."
 
all i can say is i was a cute lil 8 day old baby on 9/11/73 :D
 
Here's the thing. Pinochet was the Saddam Hussein of South America. He had thousands killed upon his orders. He's so damned old and frail that he will probably not even survive his trial for his crimes.

Chile has done ONE significant thing that we (in the USA at least) should regard -- they reformed their social security system. I think this was well after Pinochet was out of power.

In any event, this is a topic valid of discussion, but this thread has become a trainwreck.

Let's keep it dignified here and drop the "fuck off" comments, georgez. Brino can "play nice" if you can. Let's all exercise some civility and the thread might lead to some really interesting talk. :)

Cheers. :hatsoff:
 

McRocket

Banned
I don't use profanity in my posts (as far as I am aware). But why is everyone so touchy about profanity?
Are we ten year olds? Is this church? (not that I go to church - that's a laugh) This is a porn chat forum. Do people think we are going to not swear? Swearing is a perfectly fine way of communicating to me. It's what the swear word means to me that matters. Not whether it is used or not.

I mean no disrespect to anyone here. But if I insult someone badly without swearing, it is okay? But if I just say 'f_ck off', then I might be banned?
Please.
If someone wants to tell me to f off. Fine. I can take it. Why can many others seemingly not? That to me is very slight censorship.

To me, anyone can say anything to anyone in anyway they want to as long as it is what they truly feel. Others are then entitled to say they don't like that. But to ban someone simply because they express themselves in a more colourful way? I do not agree.
And like it or not - that is a form of mild censorship. And I HATE censorship in ANY form.

I will now step down off my soap bax. Good day all.
 
Last edited:

Brino

Banned
mcrocket said:
I don't use profanity in my posts (as far as I am aware). But why is everyone so touchy about profanity?
Are we ten year olds? Is this church? (not that I go to church - that's a laugh) This is a porn chat forum. Do people think we are going to not swear? Swearing is a perfectly fine way of communicating to me. It's what the swear word means to me that matters. Not whether it is used or not.

I mean no disrespect to anyone here. But if I insult someone badly without swearing, it is okay? But if I just say 'f_ck off', then I might be banned?
Please.
If someone wants to tell me to f off. Fine. I can take it. Why can many others seemingly not? That to me is very slight censorship.

To me, anyone can say anything to anyone in anyway they want to as long as it is what they truly feel. Others are then entitled to say they don't like that. But to ban someone simply because they express themselves in a more colourful way? I do not agree.
And like it or not - that is a form of mild censorship. And I HATE censorship in ANY form.

I will now step down off my soap bax. Good day all.

I don't care about the profanity, I'm just not going to "fuck off" just because somebody tells me too.
 

QBall1970

Banned
Nightfly said:
Here's the thing. Pinochet was the Saddam Hussein of South America. He had thousands killed upon his orders. He's so damned old and frail that he will probably not even survive his trial for his crimes.

To further Nightfly's brief history on Pinochet-Ugarte, here is a link from The Biography Channel detailing exactly what sort of respected "leader" this fine, upstanding gentleman really was:

> http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/new_site/biography.php?id=493

"Highlights" of his oh-so-brilliant political career:

A. September 1973, Chilean President Salvador Allende lost his life in the coup led by General Pinochet, who lead a military junta representing Chile's armed forces.

B. Pinochet ordered the purges that saw more than 3,000 supporters of the Allende regime killed, and many thousands more tortured or forced into exile.

C. He closed down the Chilean Parliament, banned all political and trade union activity and, in 1974, appointed himself president.

D. In 1990 he reluctantly stepped down as president. However, he remained commander-in-chief of the army, a position he used to ensure both that there were no prosecutions against members of the security forces suspected of human rights abuses, and to block any radical political initiatives.

And, dear friends, he ACTUALLY has the wherewithal and temerity to post his own version of his regime's story on a web-site dedicated to... whom else... himself:

> http://www.publica.com/bio.html

God, how I love research!!

georgez...

Telling someone who is well respected to "fuck off" ain't really cool. He has just as much right to express his opinion and to post such on this thread as you do. While I definitely do not agree with your assessment about Pinoche-Ugarte, I have to say: to each his own.

Just don't force it down our throats or profanely chastise someone when their opinions differ.

:hatsoff:
 
Btw, the americans were also responsable for this... they did put Pinochet in power... that's what you get when you try to run a foreign country... hum, that remind me of something... ;)
 
Well, we're (USA) doing just fine running Canada (the 51st state) for you beer-guzzling, moose-chasing, hockey-playing maniacs! LMFAO JUST KIDDING! lol :D :) hehehe
 
Nightfly said:
Well, we're (USA) doing just fine running Canada (the 51st state) for you beer-guzzling, moose-chasing, hockey-playing maniacs! LMFAO JUST KIDDING! lol :D :) hehehe

Do you want me the smack the greed out of you dickwad ? :D :1orglaugh ;)
 
Top