Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) Reverses Stance on Gay Marriage

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
It's always only when it affects them personally that conservatives stop being hard-asses about social issues. I hope his GOP colleagues treat him like the dicks that they are.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/15/rob-portman-gay-marriage_n_2881805.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

Rob Portman Reverses Gay Marriage Stance After Son Comes Out



Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) has reversed his stance on same-sex marriage two years after learning that his son is gay, several Ohio news outlets, including the Columbus Dispatch and the Cleveland Plain Dealer, reported Friday.

In an interview with Ohio reporters in his Senate office, Portman said that his son, Will, came out to the senator and his wife in February 2011.

"It allowed me to think of this issue from a new perspective, and that's of a Dad who loves his son a lot and wants him to have the same opportunities that his brother and sister would have -- to have a relationship like Jane and I have had for over 26 years," Portman said.

Portman said that his son, who is now a junior at Yale University, inspired him to reassess his position on same-sex unions. The senator also consulted clergy on the matter, as well as friends such as former Vice President Dick Cheney, whose daughter Mary is openly gay. According to Portman, Cheney told the senator to "follow [his] heart" on the matter.

"The overriding message of love and compassion that I take from the Bible, and certainly the Golden Rule, and the fact that I believe we are all created by our maker, that has all influenced me in terms of my change on this issue," Portman said.

Portman's announcement comes just days before the Supreme Court hears arguments on the Defense Of Marriage Act, the federal ban on same-sex marriage. Portman co-sponsored the measure as a member of the U.S. House in 1996. And in 2009, Portman voted for a measure prohibiting same-sex couples in Washington state from adopting children.

In 2011, Portman's "openly hostile" record on gay rights led to hundreds of students at the University of Michigan objecting to the senator speaking at the school's graduation ceremony.

"Rob believes marriage is a sacred bond between one man and one woman," a Portman spokesman told the Plain Dealer at the time of the protest.

Portman, who was considered by 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney as a potential running mate, says that he informed Romney about his son's sexual orientation.

"I told Mitt Romney everything," Portman told CNN. "That process is, intrusive would be one way to put it. But, no, yeah, I told him everything."

The senator also said that Romney's campaign told him that his son's sexuality was not part of the decision to select Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) over Portman.
 
A great deal of GOP have lived sheltered privileged lives and only gain clarity about their fellow man through life itself. The party of MY WAY!! with zero room for compromise.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
No matter the reason, good to have his support on the correct side of the issue. It takes a big man to admit he was wrong so I applaud him for it. :clap:
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
I'm glad he supports his son but this entire issue should be decided by individual states, the same goes for abortion.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
How convenient that he changes his mind when his son comes out. :facepalm:

His career is over. Which actually should not be a career.
 
Less concerned with the why, just good to hear that there's one more legislator who's putting the middle ages to rest.
 

Rattrap

Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
It's always only when it affects them personally that conservatives stop being hard-asses about social issues.
No joke.

Still,
No matter the reason, good to have his support on the correct side of the issue. It takes a big man to admit he was wrong so I applaud him for it. :clap:
Less concerned with the why, just good to hear that there's one more legislator who's putting the middle ages to rest.
Have to agree here. He may be a tool, but at least he's beginning to point in the right direction.

I'm glad he supports his son but this entire issue should be decided by individual states, the same goes for abortion.
I am normally for states' rights, but in this case I entirely disagree...and now that I'm reading over the 14th Amendment, I'm curious how any bans of same-sex marriage are standing up at all. But then, I've been steadily losing confidence in the Supreme Court. I still can't get over the strip search ruling.
 
This is a curious case. Someone who was against it gained some first hand experience with the issue, and changed his mind. Isn't that interesting? When you become educated on this issue, you're likely to change your mind. Hmm. The uneducated think one way, the educated think differently. It's amazing what experience and knowledge do for you.
 
I hope you get raped tonight. Like right square in the asshole. And I hope it gets you hard.

Won't happen.

1. I'm not a queer.
2. I don't hang out in queer bars.
3. I carry two firearms with me at all times.

Bring it, bitch!
 
Won't happen.

1. I'm not a queer.
2. I don't hang out in queer bars.
3. I carry two firearms with me at all times.

Bring it, bitch!

No one comfortable with your sexuality finds it necessary to demean that of others; wouldn't surprise me if you spent the odd weekend "just keeping tabs" on your local "queer" bar. Failing that, go fuck an oncoming train like a good lad.
 
Any relation to Natalie Portman? Now there is an actress.

(Maybe he changed his name as well)
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
I vote for him. He's a friend of gun owners, and has a good NRA rating. I know that's off topic, but he is in my district, and he was the better of the 2 choices.

I would also point out, it is one more Republican, that is easing up on the complete and total right wing, ultra conservative bullshit. It would be nice to see the Republicans field a candidate that actually has a chance of winning, because he hasn't alienated EVERY woman, from voting for him.
 
Call me a cynic, but I think he getting way too much credit for this. He's a Republican senator in a state the was blue in '08 and '12 and this "issue" is a non-starter everywhere except the Bible Belt. I think this was entirely politically motivated and his son is just a safe way for him to "change his stance".
 
I would also point out, it is one more Republican, that is easing up on the complete and total right wing, ultra conservative bullshit. It would be nice to see the Republicans field a candidate that actually has a chance of winning, because he hasn't alienated EVERY woman, from voting for him.

It certainly would be nice to see a shift in the Republican party, making them truly viable again.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
I vote for him. He's a friend of gun owners, and has a good NRA rating. I know that's off topic, but he is in my district, and he was the better of the 2 choices.

I would also point out, it is one more Republican, that is easing up on the complete and total right wing, ultra conservative bullshit. It would be nice to see the Republicans field a candidate that actually has a chance of winning, because he hasn't alienated EVERY woman, from voting for him.

It certainly would be nice to see a shift in the Republican party, making them truly viable again.

Agree 100%. I would love to have a legitimate republican option in an upcoming election.
 

JaanaRuutu

Official Checked Star Member
I never understood why the same people who whine about the government being "too big" and "too intrusive" find nothing wrong with making and supporting laws that deny a large chunk of the population the right to marry and adopt. "GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO GET OUT OF OUR LIVES!..unless, you're gay, in which case GOVERNMENT MUST ENSURE YOU'RE NOT EQUAL TO ME."
 
Top