Sandra Shine

don't thank me, thank Sandra. I'm sure if she didn't have her fingers in something wet and warm she'd have posted them herself.

EDIT
 
Last edited by a moderator:
anker89 said:
don't thank me, thank Sandra. I'm sure if she didn't have her fingers in something wet and warm she'd have posted them herself.

EDIT


Why were the links removed from this post BNF. They were only 5, all new and it wasn't a consecutive post. Sounds like someones got a little trigger happy or jealous
http://www.sandrashinehardcore.com/pictures_sites/design_001/dj_shop_tgp.html
http://www.sandrashinehardcore.com/pictures_sites/design_001/gold_dreams_tgp.html
http://www.sandrashinehardcore.com/pictures_sites/design_001/naughty_in_red_tgp.html
http://www.sandrashinehardcore.com/pictures_sites/design_001/on_a_hot_desert_sunset_tgp.html
http://www.sandrashinehardcore.com/...001/sandra_shine_and_sandee_westgate_tgp.html
 
Last edited:

BNF

Ex-SuperMod
anker89 said:

The answer (since you asked in public you get the answer here): 5 links posted on 3-14 at 12:36, 5 more posted on the same day at 4:19. In other words, 10 links in barely 4 hours. The rules are pretty clear about consecutive posting (essentially 5 links in a thread over the course of a day.....)

1) I have been cautious when doing every edit I have ever done. (I've edited c600 posts/threads since March 1 2006 alone. That's just the trackable edits.) You are welcome to see the results of posting like that in this thread, and the careful editing.

2) Of what would I possibly be jealous? I appreciate your links as much or more than the average member - especially in Sandra's thread.

If you are joking, then you should have tried to indicate it. If you weren't - then you will understand why you were just addressed in public.
 
BNF said:
The answer (since you asked in public you get the answer here): 5 links posted on 3-14 at 12:36, 5 more posted on the same day at 4:19. In other words, 10 links in barely 4 hours. The rules are pretty clear about consecutive posting (essentially 5 links in a thread over the course of a day.....)

1) I have been cautious when doing every edit I have ever done. (I've edited c600 posts/threads since March 1 2006 alone. That's just the trackable edits.) You are welcome to see the results of posting like that in this thread, and the careful editing.

The rules are clear
1 - No more than 5 links in the post, I only posted 5 per post not 6 or 10[within the rules]
2 - You can NOT post consecutive posts with gallery links, someone else posted after my first so they weren't consecutive [again with in the rules]

As for the example, roberto posted consecutively and so broke the rules, I didn't. sounds like a daily limit of links per thread needs adding [5 or 6] to the rules to make things clear and/or the number of times you can post in a thread a day. A crack down on Posts with only smilies, only one or few words would be better than deleting/banning users who do a lot for others benefit, it's one rule even the mods break frequently.
I asked in public as its something others need to be aware of too.
Heres four pics you don't see too often
http://www.insidetwistys.com/87/?t1/revs=askjolene
http://www.cloud9models.com/sandra-shine-porn.html
http://www.sex-ladies.com/babe050/0rr.html
http://galleries.earlmiller.com/fhg/Sandra_Shine_2/g1/?nats=MzQ6Mzox
 
EDIT - I can, it means you are trying to share content. BNF

I'm sure you can figure out what the asterisks mean. If not, too bad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top