Unrealistic ... but I don't like to choose money over a person ...
Unrealistic ... unless it's some "here today, gone tomorrow" US reality show.
First off, take the fact that I'm married completely out of the question. Otherwise, take the dough and probably donate it to charity in her name.
So, secondly, let's differentiate between "spending $3,000 for her" and "giving up $3,000 for her." If it's the former, no, I don't spent $3,000 of my money to have her (maybe if she had a heavier, fuller, hourglass shaped sister, but that's besides the point). But if it's the latter ...
I've gotta say, I just don't think receiving $3,000 to not be with someone is worth it. Call me foolish, especially given the fact that it is -- economically -- virtually the same as spending $3,000 on her, it's just not to me. So I'd have her for the evening, take her to dinner, dancing and talk her ear off for the night, and then take her home -- without wanting anything.
And when I say not wanting anything, people who know me know this woman is not even my type. Too thin, almost straight in form, an attractive brunette from the neck-up, but I'm a hourglass lover. Again, I just don't like the idea of choosing money over someone, so wouldn't take the money.
Weird, eh? Can't explain it otherwise, I just wouldn't take the money.