Rep. King to Obama: "use the word 'terrorism' more often."

:rolleyes:

http://www.randirhodes.com/pages/journal.html?feed=380723&article=6565256

Faith Over Fear Mongering
Email article | Print article | RSS
Thursday, January 7, 2010

It’s a scary world… but evidently not scary enough for certain Republicans. For instance, when New York Congressman Peter King was recently asked to name one “specific recommendation the president could implement right now” to make the country safer, he said “I think one main thing would be to, just himself to use the word ‘terrorism’ more often.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/06/rep-kings-recommendation_n_413277.html

As Keith Olbermann pointed out, President Obama actually used the word “terrorism” 26 times when talking about the Christmas day bombing attempt. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/vp/34738028#34738028 That’s not enough for Rep. King, who evidently wants the President to be the nation’s Fear Monger In Chief. We tried that with George Bush already, Congressman King. And you know what? It was really scary. The Congressman must really love hearing the word “terror.” Are we talking about Peter King or Stephen King? Does Peter King want President Obama to periodically point and shout “Look out behind you!”? Maybe President Obama should give his next speech in the dark with a flashlight held under his face. Or instead of a weekly radio address, the President could host a “Fright Night” of scary stories about terrorists.

Well Democrats are resolved, not fearful… not even when it comes to their own political fortunes. Yesterday saw announcements from Democratic Senators Chris Dodd and Byron Dorgan that they would not seek reelection. But to read the mainstream news, you would have thought that Dodd and Dorgan had been found washed up and half-drowned on the beach after the unexpected sinking of the Democratic Party. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/us/politics/07dems.html

The media might as well have run an obituary for the Democratic Party. Well, rumors of the death of the Democrats are greatly exaggerated. Let’s put this in perspective. Yes, two Democratic Senators are retiring. But six Republican Senators are retiring. You don’t need Nate Silver to crunch those numbers to tell you that’s not exactly a death knell for Democrats. In the House, 14 GOP incumbents have decided not to run for reelection, versus only 10 Democratic incumbents. If Democrats are dropping like flies, then Republicans are dropping like flies in lead balloons.

Democrats have faith in this country, and faith in their own ability to lead it without resorting to fear mongering. The alternative would be to have more Republican Congressmen like Peter King. And that’s frightening.
 
The republicans would destroy theirs or anyone else's nation if they thought the ruin contained a path to power. Moral bankrupts, policy vacuums.
 
so how often should Obama use the word terrorism just to appease NeoCons?
 
I suspect that all they want Obama to say is

"the terrorism attack that happened is all my fault and it due entirely to the Democrat party's soft line on terrorism. I believe that to effectively fight terrorism everyone should vote for the Republicans who are the free world's only possible defence against the rising tide of terrorism.

Or some such nonsense...

I find it ironic that the neocons think terrorism is something new
 
^ you're correct and terrorism is inevitable no matter who is POTUS
 
Yeah...that will make them stop. While we're at it let's bring the fancy alert color codes...and the duct tape.
 

SgtMarine

Banned
Yeah...that will make them stop. While we're at it let's bring the fancy alert color codes...and the duct tape.

Lulz, duct tape Mega get with the time it is waterboarding and zip ties.
 
Lulz, duct tape Mega get with the time it is waterboarding and zip ties.

Uh, yea...you were most likely deployed and missed the whole duct tape punchline...

 
Top