Proof squirting is fake
- Thread starter Playernumber1
- Start date
YES FUCK OH YES! GET Karry to squirt!!!!!!!! OH man i would love that!
as far as eather being a squirter or NOT being a squirter and why there are SO many now........ well YEAH sure we all know that in porn lots of things are FAKE , buuut i have seen girls talking about how there friends who squirt showed them a trick or two on how to do it and NOW they can do it! .....but only when they want to and sometimes not even then !...but i dunno fuck all about it i just got all excited when i thought of Karry LOL
A guy who can figure out how to make 'any girl' squirt must be able to figure out how to post????
LOL squirting is so fake it's funny.
Those who try to make themselves believe it's real are never able to point to any scientific evidence that it's anything but urine.
The real question is: Why are there some dudes who desperately want to believe that women can "ejaculate" like men? Is it some veiled homoerotic urge or what?
Those who try to make themselves believe it's real are never able to point to any scientific evidence that it's anything but urine.
The real question is: Why are there some dudes who desperately want to believe that women can "ejaculate" like men? Is it some veiled homoerotic urge or what?
it just looks funny and the orgasm seems to be not so faked 
Wasn't there a TV show in which Cythera proved how she squirts? But who believes what they who on TV :rofl:? I still like to see such scenes :thumbsup:.
Wasn't there a TV show in which Cythera proved how she squirts? But who believes what they who on TV :rofl:? I still like to see such scenes :thumbsup:.Right, but that's not the point. If one is making a claim, ie., that there is such a thing as 'squirting,' then it's up to that person to prove it. It's not everyone else's duty to prove the claim is wrong.
For example, if I said, "There are magic elves dancing on everyone's heads, now prove me wrong," you'd think I was crazy. I'd have to prove it to you to make you believe it.
Therefore, if anyone has a claim that women "squirt," despite the fact that there are no physiological structures or evolutionary need for it, it's that person's job to prove it.
So far, nobody's proved it. And it's really a ridiculous theory anyway. It can easily be explained by urine.
There are a million different articles on the internet written by doctors that prove that squirting is real. Of course some of the ones where they squirt like 6 feet in the air are fake but not all of them are. If Cytherea is just urinating she must drink like 10 litres of water before every scene because she squirts a huge load then about a mintue later hse's doing it again and some times she does it like 10 times a scene.
Thank the lord! I'm looking forward to reading even just a few of these million articles! Please provide links, thanks.
Actually that's more than I thought you could find!
This one:
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/sexandrelationships/female_ejaculation.htm
is the most reliable.
Since the Christian one says: "Have you ever wondered what that line was on the back side of a penis? It is the remnants of a man's vagina when he was a female early in gestation."
Which is actually totally untrue. It's a common myth than men "started out as women" in utero. In fact, both sexes start as sexually undetermined with rather amorphous genitalia that don't particularly resemble either male or female. Sure, the fetal genitalia looks more like a "vagina" because there's no humongous shlong, but in fact it's completely inaccurate to state that it is in fact a "vagina."
So with a glaring error like that I can't really take the rest of the article too seriously.
But the first one was good. Notably it said: "n Masters and Johnson's famous lab experiments with over 400 women, they did not record anyone who ejaculated at climax."
"In 1982 the publication of a highly influential book by sex experts Whipple, Perry and Ladas changed these views. They suggested the fluid wasn't urine, but was instead a 'juice' secreted by glands that were said to be the equivalent of the male prosta." Strangely, though, these "glands" have never been found! After a couple thousands of years of human autopsies. Funny.
The book named above that (sort of) supports the idea of female ejaculations can be found here:
http://books.google.com/books?id=oF...resnum=3&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=&f=false
However, it's mostly anecdotal evidence and stories from anonymous people. The few research studies it mentions largely have concluded that "squirting" is probably pissing but might not be. I'm summarizing here. There's certainly nothing definitive.
Therefore I'd have to say that while there might be some evidence that it's something other than urine, it's certainly not "proof" and I wouldn't put my money on it.
And of course wikipedia articles are worthless as evidence, since any freakazoid with an axe to grind can put his opinions in there.
This one:
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/sexandrelationships/female_ejaculation.htm
is the most reliable.
Since the Christian one says: "Have you ever wondered what that line was on the back side of a penis? It is the remnants of a man's vagina when he was a female early in gestation."
Which is actually totally untrue. It's a common myth than men "started out as women" in utero. In fact, both sexes start as sexually undetermined with rather amorphous genitalia that don't particularly resemble either male or female. Sure, the fetal genitalia looks more like a "vagina" because there's no humongous shlong, but in fact it's completely inaccurate to state that it is in fact a "vagina."
So with a glaring error like that I can't really take the rest of the article too seriously.
But the first one was good. Notably it said: "n Masters and Johnson's famous lab experiments with over 400 women, they did not record anyone who ejaculated at climax."
"In 1982 the publication of a highly influential book by sex experts Whipple, Perry and Ladas changed these views. They suggested the fluid wasn't urine, but was instead a 'juice' secreted by glands that were said to be the equivalent of the male prosta." Strangely, though, these "glands" have never been found! After a couple thousands of years of human autopsies. Funny.
The book named above that (sort of) supports the idea of female ejaculations can be found here:
http://books.google.com/books?id=oF...resnum=3&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=&f=false
However, it's mostly anecdotal evidence and stories from anonymous people. The few research studies it mentions largely have concluded that "squirting" is probably pissing but might not be. I'm summarizing here. There's certainly nothing definitive.
Therefore I'd have to say that while there might be some evidence that it's something other than urine, it's certainly not "proof" and I wouldn't put my money on it.
And of course wikipedia articles are worthless as evidence, since any freakazoid with an axe to grind can put his opinions in there.
Similar threads
[SCENE REQUEST]
Liselott XXX – Swedish