Possible cure for HIV discovered

This is good news, there have been a few possible HIV cures discovered. I remember reading an interview with one of the main researchers of HIV saying that stem cell research could also be a way to make a possible cure for HIV. At this time though stem cell research is mostly dealing with cancers, sme STDs and other diseases but not HIV yet.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Do you really think with all the money that is being made from AIDS, they will ever release a cure? :rolleyes:

How has Magic Johnson been been so successful fighting back his HIV all of these years ?

He doesn't have AIDS. If he does, I'm Larry Bird. :yinyang:
 
"if you have it, don't fuck" issue, there is one catch to that, and I'm not trying to be funny or disrespectful: if a person has HIV and they know someone that also has it, they can fuck and have no worries.

Wrong, one of them could have a stronger strain of the HIV virus.
 
The problem in Africa could probably be helped in large part by kicking the damn catholic church out of the country's, with their midevil practice of no birth control.

What utter horseshit....and if some of you are offended maybe you should be

someone tell the Pope it isnt 1279 anymore and to get his head out of his ass.
Oh yeah and I hope they cure all disease
 
Last edited:

Violator79

Take a Hit, Spunker!
yeah, but they can pass it on to their kids.

That's true, but unless they're having incest with their kids or some of their blood gets mixed in with their kid's blood, I still say both parents, who are HIV positive, can fuck and have no worries.
 
That's true, but unless they're having incest with their kids or some of their blood gets mixed in with their kid's blood, I still say both parents, who are HIV positive, can fuck and have no worries.
Agree to disagree:

Here's my :2 cents:. If a penis tears vaginal walls, then imagine a baby going throught that. Now the eyes are a very easy place to recieve HIV, just like wounds, and genitalia. Put blood + trasmission site = increase in transmission rate.

I'm not 100% sure, but I think C-sections would lower the odds (you know shooting the site with lidocane with epinephrine), but who knows... this isn't my bag of tea (statistics)... I'll go open my books from the CDC and see what the rates and risks are.
 

Violator79

Take a Hit, Spunker!
Agree to disagree:

Here's my :2 cents:. If a penis tears vaginal walls, then imagine a baby going throught that. Now the eyes are a very easy place to recieve HIV, just like wounds, and genitalia. Put blood + trasmission site = increase in transmission rate.

I'm not 100% sure, but I think C-sections would lower the odds (you know shooting the site with lidocane with epinephrine), but who knows... this isn't my bag of tea (statistics)... I'll go open my books from the CDC and see what the rates and risks are.

Oh, if you meant the child getting HIV while in the womb and both HIV parents are fucking, then yes, I do agree they shouldn't because of the risk factor. But, what I meant is, if they have a child that's already been born, then I don't see any problems with the parents fucking, unless that child is standing right next to the bed and the juices are flying.
 
Oh, if you meant the child getting HIV while in the womb and both HIV parents are fucking, then yes, I do agree they shouldn't because of the risk factor. But, what I meant is, if they have a child that's already been born, then I don't see any problems with the parents fucking, unless that child is standing right next to the bed and the juices are flying.
Agreed... anyways who would want to see mom and dad going at it anyways... bad thought... :throwup:
 
That's a great sign though yeah I wouldn't be the first person in line to get it tested on because I don't have HIV or AIDS and don't plan on getting it anytime soon.
 
I forgot to mention there was a TV programme that was on here in the UK last year or the year before. A couple both in their twenties are both HIV positive and have been since birth, they have been on those HIV drugs since they were young, the woman got pregnant and when the baby was born there is no trace of HIV in the baby at all. That was a couple of years ago and the child still is not HIV positive scientists believe cause the fact that both of her parents are on those HIV drugs the baby's immune system evolved to combat HIV.
Another TV programme that aired a few months ago which was about evolution revealed that in some parts of Africa some people have developed immunity to HIV and AIDS no matter how much unprotected sex they had with people with HIV and AIDS, which shows that evolution is still going on in humans to this day. The only downside however is cause the fact those people have strong religious beliefs they refuse to have samples of their blood taken for scientists to study to see if that could another way to deveop a vaccine or cure or both to HIV and AIDS.
 
the worst part about it is that aids is a hard to transfer disease, compared to most, and it is easily preventable. You know how they "cured" the black plague in medieval Europe? everyone that had it died and so eventually there was no one left to pass it on.

Hard to transfer? All it takes is bodily fluid. And, since this whole entire world is fuck crazy and having sex with one another (without any hesitation), I would say that AIDS is a very easily transferable disease.


here's how to stop aids at virtually no cost.

1. don't fuck without a condom, and you probably won't get it.

2. if you have it, don't fuck. period.

that's it. pretty simple.

you have a choice between mild discomfort and social awkwardness, or dying from a debilitating disease. hmm.. gosh, i'm really not sure which one I'll choose...

I agree with that. It all goes back to the fuck happy world we live in. People aren't scared of sex until it gives them AIDS. Then...it's way too late.
 
Top