Depends on who's poll you want to believe. I saw one the other day that even after all this shit said he was still at 43%Obama certainly wasn't the worst prior to Trump, but I believe Trump has clearly put some distance between himself and the next-to-last:
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...esidency-with-approval-rating-at-new-low-poll
Depends on who's poll you want to believe. I saw one the other day that even after all this shit said he was still at 43%
Yes, a stinging indictment.One more ...
Most convicted individuals pardoned by a sitting president.
True, Trump never got 50% favorability ratings.And Biden is at 55% favorable on Gallup, higher than trump has ever been.
Given how the previous occupant of the White House acted so unpresidential, imagine many, even many who voted for him in 2016, would easily pick the Whiner In Chief as the worst...
True, true, true....and yet we have someone trying to give him a run for his moneyTrue, Trump never got 50% favorability ratings.
He couldn't even beat Hillary in the popular vote, which surely must've been a kick in the pants to his fragile ego...
Who is giving who a run?
Helping a colleague round out course material and oddly enough read the following link and thought of your post.True, Trump never got 50% favorability ratings.
He couldn't even beat Hillary in the popular vote, which surely must've been a kick in the pants to his fragile ego...
He is exhibiting his usual cryptic passive aggression. Throwing vague comments out and refusing to clarify when asked. His prerogative frankly. There is no duty to reply.Mr. moran seems to be itching for a fight as of late, but I'm sure he will just iGnOrE anything I post.
He is exhibiting his usual cryptic passive aggression. Throwing vague comments out and refusing to clarify when asked. His prerogative frankly. There is no duty to reply.
Agreed.Presidential approval ratings are like watching the stock market. You get blips up and down, but it is the long-term trend which matters.
The popularity contest is driven too much by media. Imagine the wrath George Washington would have been receiving now. You reference the Whiskey Rebellion - how about the fight over Jay’s Treaty? It was essentially the rupture to one-party rule and gave quicker rise to factions. They were coming anyway of course.
Read Fears of a Setting Sun. Great insights into the disillusionment of the ‘founders’.Agreed.
Jay's treaty certainly created the "First Party System". It become a pendulum and we see it today. The problem is the further you push the pendulum to one one side, the further it will swing back to the other side.
I forget who I'm paraphrasing, but I agree with this (...but still have thoughts of the Roman Empire's fate) - The US is basically a train that is always on track and moving forward. The passengers will lean out either side and make noise, but the train is bigger than them. - I didn't do that justice.
Washington was the only president who was able to stay out of party politics. Adams wanted to, but was the first one to get a bloody nose by it. I like him, partially because he was poor at it. You could probably make a good argument that he was a Federalist, but he held them accountable as he certainly did the Democrat-Republicans. So, they both beat him up. In my opinion, that makes him a good man. He fought the good fight. (Great President? Not so sure about that)
In this we agree. Unfortunately, I've been casting my vote in the same way.They all suck. In the almost 4 decades I've been voting, I can't remember the last time I voted FOR a president, instead of voting AGAINST someone. In my opinion, that's a pretty sad thing to have to think about. We've been conditioned like dogs, to accept the abysmal.