Phil Robertson bout ISIS : "Convert them or **** them"

The Terrible Theology Phil Robertson Would Use To Combat ISIS


Phil Robertson, the controversial star of the reality TV show Duck Dynasty, appeared on Sean Hannity’s show last night, where he used predictably terrible theology to argue that radical Muslim militants in Iraq should only be given two choices: convert to Christianity, or die.

Robertson was invited onto the show to promote his new book “unPHILtered: The Way I See It,” but Hannity immediately asked the duck call mogul how the United States should respond to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the radical Muslim group currently terrorizing Syria and Iraq and ********* western journalists. Robertson responded by opening his Bible, pulling out his Declaration of Independence bookmark, and citing verses such as 1 John 5, which he said divides the world into “two groups of people,” — the “******** of God,” or Christians, and those under the power of the “evil one,” who he implied was both ISIS and possibly all Muslims. He also cited Proverbs 8:36, or “all who **** me, love death,” before boiling down his understanding of the ISIS situation into a single grim choice.

“I think you either have to convert them … or **** them. One or the other,” Robertson said.

Watch the FOX News video of the interview below:
Premium Media Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread

Although many Christians — including Pope Francis — struggle with how to respond to ISIS, there is an especially dark irony to Robertson’s comments: he claims it as a Christian position, but the dualistic “convert or ****” ideology is also known to be the horrific calling card of ISIS. Multiple reports indicate that ISIS soldiers issue hard-lined ultimatums to the denizens of cities they conquer, demanding that they either convert to their radical interpretation of Islam, pay a tax, leave, or die. They are especially ruthless to religious minorities they encounter, such as the thousands of the Yazidis recently trapped on Mount Sinjar and Christians who are regularly ****** at the hands of their soldiers.

And while Robertson went on to say that he would “rather have a Bible study” than **** ISIS troops, his warmongering theology is an example of what many refer to as “proof-texting,” or the rapid-fire listing of holy scriptures — out of context — to make a specific point, even if the original scriptures don’t actually support one’s position. Robertson’s citation of 1 John: 5, for instance, which he used to draw a distinction between the ******** of God and “evil one,” is odd choice to justify the ******* of others. Most scholars agree that 1 John was written to address the possibility of schism between different kinds of Christians, not to delineate a difference between Christians and other religions, such as Islam (which didn’t exist at the time). Robertson apparently sees this verse as an excuse for ********, but theologians such as John Calvin have interpreted this and similar passages to mean that the world as an irreparably broken place that can only be overcome through God and an adherence to a love-based “new commandment” mentioned in 1 John 2: 9-10: “Whoever says, ‘I am the light,’ while hating a ******* or ******, is still in the darkness. Whoever loves a ******* or ****** lives in the light, and in such a person there is no cause for stumbling.”

Also, proof-texting works both ways. Robertson’s violent theology requires that he ignore dozens of explicitly peace-focused verses, such as Luke 6:27, where Jesus declares, “But I say to you that listen, Love your enemies, do good to those who **** you,” during his sermon on the mount/plain. There is also Matthew 26:52, where Jesus demanded that one of his disciples sheathe his ***** and refrain from ********, saying, “All who take the ***** will perish by the *****.” That verse, of course, echoes one of the Ten Commandments in Exodus 20, which reads, “You shall not ****.”

And despite Robertson’s claim to self-righteous ******** as a member of the “******** of God,” Christ had a slightly different definition in Matthew 5:9, where he declares to an assembled crowd, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called ******** of God.”

Later in the interview, Robertson claimed that he is “personally…prepared” for “a *** fight” with ISIS. Indeed, the United States is already engaged in an increasingly intense conflict with the Muslim group, and it remains to be seen whether the global community will endorse an increased military response. But if Robertson is looking for a fight, he’ll have a hard time finding it in Jesus’ biblical teachings.
Premium Link Upgrade

And the fact that S. Hannity do not argue with Robertson shows that he agrees with that

ISIS to Iraqi christians : "Covert [to Islam] or die !"
Fox News to ISIS : "Convert [to christianism] or die !"

Now, tell me how christianism is better than Islam ?
The other day, L. Ingraham told that Obama's true enemies were the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News", not ISIS. Maybe she wasn't that far from reality. Maybe P. Robertson and these people should be the true enemies. 'cause their ideology is not that far from ISIS's ideology (anti-science, anti-other religion, anti-gay, anti-abortion, etc...) but ISIS is far away while Limbaugh, Robertson, Fox and Ingraham actualy are in the US...
 

Premium Content

This thread contains exclusive content for our premium community members.

What you're missing:
  • Full discussion and replies
  • Community interaction and voting
Already have an account?
✨ Unlock exclusive discussions and premium features
Premium Benefits:
Exclusive content • Priority support • Advanced features • Full thread access
Top