Is that how it's supposed to work? I offer my practical experience on a subject, you contest my claims by citing studies (as I am unaware of any study that strictly sought to conclude the effects of supplements on seminal volume) but I get to be the one who produces a study to support my claims??
I don't think so. If these numerous studies are so easy to find then it should be easy enough to link one or point me to one so I can read the conclusions myself.
Ah, okay. I guess I can't blame you, but I'm just being honest in telling you the sites are paid for, and if you don't believe me at this point, that's fine. The best I can do with free sources is tell you to Google it. At this point, I really don't care one way or the other, you're free to not believe me if you so choose. I'll leave with this: I don't doubt that you may have achieved results that you claim, however if these results were so clearly available to everyone, 1. Why isn't this well known (the "male enhancement" field is a lucrative industry), and 2. Why would companies that sell supplements that contain the very same ingredients you used be persecuted by the FDA, and their higher-ups sent to fail for fraud? It just doesn't add up.