Hi everyone,
WAS THAT TOPLESS SHOT A FAKE & ARE THOSE TITS REAL? The shot is not a fake. There are pictures of her on the Net pre boob job. She had implants prior to her site launch. That's pretty clear from the size, of course, and the shape — another woman can tell, and my wife says they're obviously fake. Whoever did the surgery, however, was a top drawer doctor.
HTH.
One change you could make to your site is to improve the video quality. In 2010 I don't think its too much to expect HD video or something close to it. I am tired of the tease but its not just what you do in the video thats a tease, its the horribly blocky pixels and tiny picture that make it look like the videos were shot in 1995. Take some of the money you're making with your successful website and invest in a cheap HD camera, your members will thank you.
How do you know this? Has there been confirmation from Patty that those are real pics and that she's had a boob job? I've never found any completely topless pics of Pattycake other than this one. If this is real, for whom did she pose if not for her own site? :dunno: I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just curious.
How do you know this? Has there been confirmation from Patty that those are real pics and that she's had a boob job? I've never found any completely topless pics of Pattycake other than this one. If this is real, for whom did she pose if not for her own site? :dunno: I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just curious.
Good question. Let me repeat that I am not here as a representative of Pattycake or her site. I am just a member that has been active long enough to remember what it was like at the beginning of her tenure on the Net. To my knowledge Pattycake appeared as a model on two other web sites before she launched her own. Boob job? Other than my wife's opinion (and what woman doesn't have opinions about other women?) I offer unto you proof from Patty's own website:
Patty before and after
The pictures predating the current state of things are no longer featured on her site. Consistency is key with her and I clearly remember her posting that she was not really pleased with the look of the older stuff -- you can see the difference -- the new material is magazine quality work. Patty refuses to talk about this subject. That's her right, and we should respect that. Common sense should tell you that there was some enhancement, though the exact nature of it shall (and should) remain shrouded in mystery. Personally I don't really care to know the details -- they look great -- end of story.
HTH.
Thanks for the info & pics (Dr. Gyro as well.) I thought I was pretty good at spotting silcones. I've been a Patty fan for years and I never suspected it. Damn good implants. Doesn't make me love her any less. I'm just a curious fan.
I think it's because she's got a meaty ass to boot. Always makes bigger boobs more in proportion.
That is rather clearly a fake. There are blurs where someone smudged the image all over the place.
neat-o... but not hot untill it's the real deal.:anonymous