Official: Bush is a Dumbass
- Thread starter Sutty
- Start date
I am not a Bush guy, but you have to be somewhat fair. How come the web site doesn't feature our only impeached president?
I mean, talk about a dumbass. Who can be attributed to this famous quote, "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman". That's right, a blow job from another women isn't sex, well, at least that's what I tell my wife. After all, that's what President Clinton said.
Now we have a presidential candidate that has flipp-flopped on almost every quote that has ever come out of his mouth. Oh, wait, we can't be hold him accountable because he went to Viet Nam and is a war hero. Just watch excuses fly as more is learned about his affair with his intern.
This is a great year for mudslinging, but you gotta watch both sides.
Ranger
:glugglug: :glugglug: :glugglug:
I mean, talk about a dumbass. Who can be attributed to this famous quote, "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman". That's right, a blow job from another women isn't sex, well, at least that's what I tell my wife. After all, that's what President Clinton said.
Now we have a presidential candidate that has flipp-flopped on almost every quote that has ever come out of his mouth. Oh, wait, we can't be hold him accountable because he went to Viet Nam and is a war hero. Just watch excuses fly as more is learned about his affair with his intern.
This is a great year for mudslinging, but you gotta watch both sides.
Ranger
:glugglug: :glugglug: :glugglug:
dont hope so
I look at it this way............if I was a terriorist, who would I want in office?
Any Demo. They have no clue on terrorism. Liebermann was ok. but Kerry, supports the war, doesn't support the war. Who knows with this guy. He has voted against every major military package, wanted to get rid of the CIA, etc. etc.
this is WWIII, but it isn't fought on the conventional battlefields. There are a bunch of bad guys out there who could care less of they **** themselves as long as they take a couple of infidels(sp?) with them.
Bush looses on the ecomony, if he looses. It really isn't his fault, Clinton left him in a recession and 9/11 takes place. Things turn bad overnight and take years to recover.
Like I said, it will be a dirty campaign.
Ranger:hatsoff:
Any Demo. They have no clue on terrorism. Liebermann was ok. but Kerry, supports the war, doesn't support the war. Who knows with this guy. He has voted against every major military package, wanted to get rid of the CIA, etc. etc.
this is WWIII, but it isn't fought on the conventional battlefields. There are a bunch of bad guys out there who could care less of they **** themselves as long as they take a couple of infidels(sp?) with them.
Bush looses on the ecomony, if he looses. It really isn't his fault, Clinton left him in a recession and 9/11 takes place. Things turn bad overnight and take years to recover.
Like I said, it will be a dirty campaign.
Ranger:hatsoff:
my thoughts on this link.
first it is always easy to criticize the us president. that goes one time but not all the time.
do you think that mr jacques chirac is that good? he sold the mirage f1 cq and eq war planes to irak in 1974 to saddam hussein perosnnally when he was working in the ministry of defense.
he also built the nuclear plant of Ozirak that was happily destroyed by the Israelis in their air raid in 1982.Chirac refused to involve France in war against Irak. Saddam Hussein met Jacques Chirac in the 70's and the 80's.If Chirac refused to involve France that decision was made to avoid to endanger franco arab relationships as well as to preserve French interest in Irak. Very low decision.Also with many laws that were made to reduce unemployment with the government of Jacques Chirac have given nothing, like under Mitterand, the country (France) gets more and more fucked up,Euro has made life 40% more expensive and Euro is a fuckin illusion same is for Europe.Europe will never be.1st reason why because each country looks for its interests and the european constitution will never be and 2nd reason because each people has its own way of thinking.
Dean fucked up the vermont.Who has mainly resolved the problems of unemployment in the us?The republicans. None forgets ronald reagan one of the best presidents the us had.Dwight D Eisenhower , Harry S Truman, Reagan and Bush Senior were also good president. Of course franklin d roosevelt and kennedy were the best democrats presidents.
About bush jr he was quite ballsy to kick the ass of the talibans, to defeat saddam and fight terrorism. You cannot like him that is your matter but you must recognize that he fights terrorism strongly and efficiently.
regards and no offense taken
georges
first it is always easy to criticize the us president. that goes one time but not all the time.
do you think that mr jacques chirac is that good? he sold the mirage f1 cq and eq war planes to irak in 1974 to saddam hussein perosnnally when he was working in the ministry of defense.
he also built the nuclear plant of Ozirak that was happily destroyed by the Israelis in their air raid in 1982.Chirac refused to involve France in war against Irak. Saddam Hussein met Jacques Chirac in the 70's and the 80's.If Chirac refused to involve France that decision was made to avoid to endanger franco arab relationships as well as to preserve French interest in Irak. Very low decision.Also with many laws that were made to reduce unemployment with the government of Jacques Chirac have given nothing, like under Mitterand, the country (France) gets more and more fucked up,Euro has made life 40% more expensive and Euro is a fuckin illusion same is for Europe.Europe will never be.1st reason why because each country looks for its interests and the european constitution will never be and 2nd reason because each people has its own way of thinking.
Dean fucked up the vermont.Who has mainly resolved the problems of unemployment in the us?The republicans. None forgets ronald reagan one of the best presidents the us had.Dwight D Eisenhower , Harry S Truman, Reagan and Bush Senior were also good president. Of course franklin d roosevelt and kennedy were the best democrats presidents.
About bush jr he was quite ballsy to kick the ass of the talibans, to defeat saddam and fight terrorism. You cannot like him that is your matter but you must recognize that he fights terrorism strongly and efficiently.
regards and no offense taken
georges
georges,
What is your view on all(alleged)bribery that was going on with France, Germany and Russia? Is it crap or will details come out? Did oil contracts prevent those three from supporting the ouster of Saddam?
Good viewpoints........That's what I llke about this forum. I'm a yank living in the USA, you're one living aboard, and there is plenty of other posters from different countries with totally different views.
Is that a result of government controlled media? I have seen some foreign(to me) media that has really come down hard on Bush but not on any of the liberal demos.
Ranger:hatsoff:
What is your view on all(alleged)bribery that was going on with France, Germany and Russia? Is it crap or will details come out? Did oil contracts prevent those three from supporting the ouster of Saddam?
Good viewpoints........That's what I llke about this forum. I'm a yank living in the USA, you're one living aboard, and there is plenty of other posters from different countries with totally different views.
Is that a result of government controlled media? I have seen some foreign(to me) media that has really come down hard on Bush but not on any of the liberal demos.
Ranger:hatsoff:
well Bush wont be around for another four years once all the details of his reserve work. and atleast Kerry was in a war and didnt dodge it. hes gunna get us out of the middle east once hes elected because he knows how crappy war is for the troops. and the funny thing about the U.S restoring democracy in the middle east is that we are electing the officials that are supposed to be the view of the middle eastern people.
-hopefully you guys can comprehend what i said. i am very tired and the post wasnt thuroughly thought through.
-hopefully you guys can comprehend what i said. i am very tired and the post wasnt thuroughly thought through.
With that thought process, how did a draft dodger, a guy that protested the war in England get elected president of the US for two terms? People forget.
No disrespect, but the same crap came out in 2000 election and went by the wayside. They have guys that trained with him, pay stubs, medical records. He was a jet pilot and they were in the top pool to go because of the losses over there. The head of the DNC started the accusation up and just to get the mud tossing.
Anyway madman, California seems to have everything happening. You got a mayor of a major city breaking the law by performing those marriages. What is the terminator going to do?
ranger:hatsoff:
No disrespect, but the same crap came out in 2000 election and went by the wayside. They have guys that trained with him, pay stubs, medical records. He was a jet pilot and they were in the top pool to go because of the losses over there. The head of the DNC started the accusation up and just to get the mud tossing.
Anyway madman, California seems to have everything happening. You got a mayor of a major city breaking the law by performing those marriages. What is the terminator going to do?
ranger:hatsoff:
the terminator can burn in hell for all i care. dont get me started with Arnold. hes just a fucking womanizer dumbass who married an ugly kennedy and now he thinks hes the **** so he goes and runs for governor. he doesnt know anything. my favorite quote of his is, "Gay marriage should be between a man and a woman." Well said...dumbass!
Ranger said:
The three countries that had the strongest economic ties to the Saddam Hussein regime were France, Germany, and Russia, and so I don't think it's a stretch to say that that was a major factor (if not the only factor) to their gov'ts opposition to the war. Money is usually the deciding factor in situations like this IMO. That doesn't sound good on TV, however, so they preach ideology instead (really it's nothing more than propaganda). Unfortunately, every country does it.
to answer your question Ranger, when you reveal a scandal to the public you aggrivate people, chirac wasn't very ready to recognize his faults when his sold mirage war planes and the ozirak nuclear plant.Talking about wmd saddam have hidden them also i am also sure that he transferred some of his wmd in syria. Germany also wasn't ready to recognize that it has sold weapons and security systems to saddam.Also note that many of the german companies who sold chemical weapons and other security systems to irak were companies that were working with the 3rd reich during 2nd world war. And about this question ranger "Did oil contracts prevent those three from supporting the ouster of Saddam?" i can probably say yes.Now about russia you must know that it has sold mig 21fishbed, mig 23flogger f-g & mig 29 war planes as well as t55,t56, t72 & t80 tanks as well as scuds ballistic missiles not only to irak but to libya, syria, iran, india, yemen & china
hope i answered your question ranger.
regards
georges
hope i answered your question ranger.
regards
georges
Ranger said:
Wrong. Al-Quida loves Bush. No other person has done more to strengthen their recruitment.
If we return Bush to power, especially in a clear and fair election (instead of something that smells of fraud), then as a nation, we are condoning and approving of the invasion of a country under false and fraudulent pretenses, the continued occupation of that country as an unannounced military and intelligence base for the destabilization of the larger region, and the ******* and ****** of the inhabitants of that country (as there is only a provisional puppet government, they can't really be citizens, perhaps subjects is a better term).
I don't usually indulge in political discussions on bulletin boards, but I feel pretty strongly about this.
Speaking as an American, a veteran and a (now former) Republican; Bush has got to go.
:hatsoff:
Ranger said:
Actually, no. They don't. Not for his last year. Bush was AWOL from his unit.
But when you come from a rich and powerful ******, that is nothing unusual.
I will agree with you that this issue will not decide the election though. The war and the economy will.
I just hope Bush is re-elected for the sole reason that Hillary Clinton would have a nice shot in 2008.
Whoever is elected this next term is gonna have a hard time of proving anything. The next term isn't going to be a good one... Im aiming for a good president in 2008. And Hillary Clinton will more than likely be the Democrat in that election if Bush is re-elected.
So Im voting Bush.
For all the Bill Clinton bashers... He was still a great president. Whether you liked him or not. A blowjob doesn't make you less of a leader. Well... Depends on how good of a BJ it was... Might need to rest before resuming duties.:hatsoff:
Whoever is elected this next term is gonna have a hard time of proving anything. The next term isn't going to be a good one... Im aiming for a good president in 2008. And Hillary Clinton will more than likely be the Democrat in that election if Bush is re-elected.
So Im voting Bush.
For all the Bill Clinton bashers... He was still a great president. Whether you liked him or not. A blowjob doesn't make you less of a leader. Well... Depends on how good of a BJ it was... Might need to rest before resuming duties.:hatsoff:
BY that logic, if Kerry is elected now, we could have McCain in 2008.
That would rock.
That would rock.
SovereignAxe
Closed Account
yeah, i heard about this one too. al quada actually made a statement that they like Bush.Anime Pornstar said:
I usually lean democrat but after watching McCain pummel Rumsfeld at the prison scandal hearings, the man's ok in my book. so yeah, kerry now, mccain after kerry
Republicans traditional spend more money for military projects though. Democrats are more Domestic leaders.
It doesn't matter... We are an oligarchy anyways.
But as far as Kerry being worse for the war... The fact is... Partisanship doesn't matter when your at war. We can't just pull out troops just because Kerry thinks its a bad idea. Whoever is elected president is going to have to support the troops over there anyways.
And the recruits because of Bush is total BS internet gossip.
Kerry didn't have an affair with his intern. This was shot down very quickly. During any political run **** comes out that isn't true.
Some of it gets mass media, some don't.
:hatsoff:
It doesn't matter... We are an oligarchy anyways.
But as far as Kerry being worse for the war... The fact is... Partisanship doesn't matter when your at war. We can't just pull out troops just because Kerry thinks its a bad idea. Whoever is elected president is going to have to support the troops over there anyways.
And the recruits because of Bush is total BS internet gossip.
Kerry didn't have an affair with his intern. This was shot down very quickly. During any political run **** comes out that isn't true.
Some of it gets mass media, some don't.
:hatsoff:
