Obama Addesses CIA

Re: What about ... ???

I don't know what you're talking about.
That's obvious. You are utterly missing the context I'm pointing out, which explains why history repeats itself. The more people like yourself want to focus narrowly on one, party-aligned view, the more you miss all the surrounding issues that extends across many.

I'm simply asking where has the US ever sanctioned actions that constitute water boarding instead of punishing it?
Well let me ask a question. When has the US ever punished for water boarding? Or torture in general?! Answer me that!

You've asked a lot of questions, questions you know there is no answer for, in the hope that "proves" something. The reality is that we can ask a lot of questions that we will never get an answer for.

As much as you try to make your narrow focus "the real issue" and everything else being a "spin" or "don't know what I'm talking about," I can easily pose a return question that basically says, "yeah, the 'big picture' is that scary, isn't it?"

And where has the law been legally changed to make actions recognized as water boarding legal?
What law has been made that says water boarding is illegal? Seriously?!

Heck, holding anyone against their will is "illegal," let alone subjecting them to sleep deprivation, long and physically strenuous positions, etc... has been considered "illegal" by many.

Yet it has been done against American citizens in prisons, sometimes without prosecution in jails. And most things on the DoJ list alone have been regular, acknowledge form of interrogation by a great number of western nations.

All the CIA has admitted to is three (3) uses of water boarding post-9/11. That's all we have. Doesn't mean it's remotely true, let alone even being to count the number of "indirect" torture events the US has been an "indirect" party to.

So if you want to solely focus on only that, let alone try to call what the DoJ released as "orders" (and you claim I'm "spinning" things?), is getting old. Let's focus on the greater issues, including why the DoJ list came about.

Those are two, simple questions.
And yet you won't answer my own for the same reasons. There are no answers. There is only speculation, accusation and endless, political arguments.

You want to argue narrow-minded, politically-aligned rhetoric. I want to argue reality.

I've also pointed out the real fact that Obama is merely trying to be a leader, much like Ford did the same. That if people want to dig the hole, they'll find a lot of people buried in it. The only thing you can do is make it an Executive Order so their is no doubt left going forward. I respect Obama for just finally doing that, and putting the bullshit aside, much like Ford did as well.

People many people have done many things without it being acknowledged. What happened post-9/11 was that everyone in the western world got involved, and what used to be smaller engagements and intelligence efforts suddenly became large, unified, coordinated ones. And actions that were lesser known became far more greatly known, and the rest is cause-effect.

Heck, even the fact that JFK personally approved the assassination of the leader of South Vietnam was not known for many, many years later. Because if you dig the whole, be careful who you might find buried there, and by whom. There are a lot of dead people in the world due to various US leaders -- from JFK to W. -- and we can

Even as I pointed out, I found it a great irony that Kofi praised Harry, when many focus on the issues he created, including the deaths by his orders -- some of which people still call atrocities and demonize the US for to this day.

Obama understands this, just like Ford did.
 
Re: What about ... ???

Well let me ask a question. When has the US ever punished for water boarding? Or torture in general?! Answer me that!

You've asked a lot of questions, questions you know there is no answer for, in the hope that "proves" something. The reality is that we can ask a lot of questions that we will never get an answer for.

Siighhh, okay...I'll play along. The last time it was tacitly defended by the US was by Teddy Roosevelt (one of the only problems I ever had with TR) in 1902. But it wasn't on the bases that it wasn't torture but that no one was seriously harmed.

After that the US tried and convicted Japanese officer Yukio Asano of war crimes for water boarding in 1947. He was sentenced to 15 yrs. hard labor.

US Soldiers were court martialled for water boarding in Vietnam.

Texas Sheriff James Parker and 3 of his deputies were tried and convicted for water boarding a suspect. They were sentenced to 4 years each.
 
Re: What about ... ???

But it wasn't on the bases that it wasn't torture but that no one was seriously harmed.
I rest my case on that point, you're doing quite well at making it for me. ;)

"But it wasn't on the bases that it wasn't torture but that no one was seriously harmed."

Now you're starting to see the history, legal realities, etc... that many, many and even many more have "stood behind." ;)

After that the US tried and convicted Japanese officer Yukio Asano of war crimes for water boarding in 1947. He was sentenced to 15 yrs. hard labor.
Now you're stretching out there. Rape, far worse torture, killing, etc... was a halmark of countless, Japanese soldiers. But I don't even need to go there.

US Soldiers were court martialled for water boarding in Vietnam.
Many US soldiers who did far worse never saw any jail time, and many crimes went under-reported. Please read your history.

In fact, there were arguments that many Viet Cong were "stateless combatants" back then as well, because they were not belligerents of a nation and did not answer to anyone for their actions. A very, very direct correlation to my statements indeed.

Seriously dude, you're only making my case here.

Texas Sheriff James Parker and 3 of his deputies were tried and convicted for water boarding a suspect. They were sentenced to 4 years each.
Which was inside of the US, civilian authority on civilian person -- direct, authoritative reality, beyond question.

That's outside of what I was even referring to, because as officers of a civilian authority, they were forbidden from such by various, Supreme Common and State/Federal Constitutional Law. There was a direct, authoritative reality, beyond question.

Let's focus on US military on alleged "citizens" or "stateless combatants" that do not have binding agreements with the US, NATO, etc...
 
Re: What about ... ???

It seems you have forgotten....these were your questions.:eek:

Well let me ask a question. When has the US ever punished for water boarding? Or torture in general?! Answer me that!

What law has been made that says water boarding is illegal? Seriously?!
 
Likewise ...

It seems you have forgotten....these were your questions.:eek:
And yet I just answered yours as well. ;)

The US has repeatedly overlooked such alleged "torture." And yet there are "no answers." ;)

In other words, people don't talk about it in the media. The "sexy topic" is to focus on a very, very narrow portion of history, instead of the reality.

Many US administrations have known. And many soldiers gone uncharged. Google will provide you with just as many "no answers." ;)
 
Re: Likewise ...

And yet I just answered yours as well. ;)

The US has repeatedly overlooked such alleged "torture." And yet there are "no answers." ;)

In other words, people don't talk about it in the media. The "sexy topic" is to focus on a very, very narrow portion of history, instead of the reality.

Many US administrations have known. And many soldiers gone uncharged. Google will provide you with just as many "no answers." ;)

Sorry, time to get off this merry-go-round. You asked when has it ever been prosecuted. I cited a couple of case and I even answered for you the question I asked regarding when was the last time it was sanctioned.

I've personally been water boarded as a part of military training precisely to be prepared against it as an enemy torture tactic. It's torture.

But even if, I'd never been water boarded, common sense would tell me (and any other intellectually honest person) that repeatedly subjecting a person to near drowning is torture. And precedence (among other things) tells me (and any other intellectually honest person) that it's illegal.
:wave2:
 
Re: Likewise ...

I've personally been water boarded as a part of military training precisely to be prepared against it as an enemy torture tactic. It's torture.
You've been trained against it because it's simulates drowning and works on the fear of drowning, not because it's actual drowning.

It's something you can prevent from affecting you. Just like sleep deprivation and other things. It only takes "training." When someone cuts you, bleeds you and leaves you in a state where you are physical "damaged," especially permanently, that's not the same as a "fear" based or "reduced awareness" based interrogation techniques.

Lastly, people often confuse "extracting information" with "extracting confession." I assume you understand that real difference, yes?

But even if, I'd never been water boarded, common sense would tell me (and any other intellectually honest person) that repeatedly subjecting a person to near drowning is torture. And precedence (among other things) tells me (and any other intellectually honest person) that it's illegal.
:wave2:
Feeling, telling and using the phrase "intellectually honest person" is not legal. Otherwise, every President would have been jailed within their first few days. I could go through a laundry list with Clinton, W. and even Obama.

We all know "torture" is illegal. The question I've been asking for years "what is torture"? That's always been the problem.

Listen, I'm not defending any practices here. I'm merely pointing out things you refuse to even acknowledge. Like why the DoJ list came about, what is contained in it, etc...

On this very board, people have been claiming the White House has been behind things well beyond Water Boarding. In the end, this is all they could come up with? No offense, I feel so vindicated (read my prior posts in other threads to see what I mean).
 
Re: Likewise ...

You've been trained against it because it's simulates drowning and works on the fear of drowning, not because it's actual drowning.

Feeling, telling and using the phrase "intellectually honest person" is not legal.

We all know "torture" is illegal. The question I've been asking for years "what is torture"? That's always been the problem.

Like why the DoJ list came about, what is contained in it, etc...

I was water boarded by men I trusted with my life. I had no fear of drowning and I had no fear that I would be allowed to die under those circumstances. I don't know where you're getting your experience from but from my personal experience water boarding like suffocation or strangulation deprives the body of oxygen. If you understand the body's fight-or-flight response , you should understand that depriving the body of oxygen to the point of acute stress response (fight-or-flight) does not merely amount to psychological fear.

I never said being intellectually dishonest was illegal. I said the challenges to water boarding being illegal stem from either stupidity, ignorance or intellectual dishonesty.

The UCMJ forbids water boarding in the context of torturing captives, US law forbids water boarding in the context of torturing suspects, The ICCPR designates it as torture and the Geneva Convention designates it as torture.

The US Army Field Manual was updated in 2006 to include the prohibition of water boarding not because it was previously legal but because the Army wanted to distinctly identify water boarding as torture precisely because some were attempting to use the USAFM as a cover for water boarding.

You want to know what torture is? It is define by the Geneva Convention as any act by which the severe pain or suffering is inflicted on a person.

The operative words are "severe" and "inflicted". Those two words go along way in separating various legal techniques from torture.
 
Are we talking the CIA? Or soldiers?

This is what I continually love about this thread. You bounce around context to fit your argument, the one I'm not making. The last time I checked, we're not talking about soldiers.

I've missed it several times now, and that's on myself. This is why it's stupid for me to even bother.

So, when have CIA agents been prosecuted for water boarding? The CIA admitted that they have used water boarding three (3) times since 9/11, before the DoJ "rules" (which you quite demonizingly called "orders," among other comments like "spin").

You want to talk about Vietnam and the CIA? What about many other things?

My continued point is ...

Obama has shown the leadership to lay down the law, regardless of the past and all the avenues it leads to and through, to finally have a single, Executive Order that leaves no doubt -- the US will not be a party, direct or indirect, to torture -- finally and once'n for all!

Ford did the same with regard to not just the ordered assassination, but even the US being a party to removal of a foreign leader by assassination or other means.**

I'm honestly tired of the political-aligned and politically-motivated, "oh, I'll complain about your candidate did/does, but ignore what my candidate did/does." It's why Americans keep fucking up, repeatedly, and we have only ourselves to blame.

To date, the only complaints I have about Obama are his lack of reversing some of the intelligence gathering he promised to, and the additional issues of pushing the common African American agenda that the federal authority always supercedes the local. Other than that (ignoring the clear lies he made about lobbyists, reducing spending, etc... during the campaign that are always false and most politicians make), I'm extremely pleased with Obama, because he has shown some leadership on these and other aspects.

**NOTE: And for those that want to tangent argue that point with me on Iraq, please remember Iraq lost a war, and never complied with the terms of the 1991 cease-fire. That is legal fact, and even lawyers are tired of pointing out. I didn't agree with the invasion of Iraq, but please don't try to argue what is legally false. Just because W. was an ass and tried to use WMDs as a justification doesn't remove that fact either. It's also the opposing reason why the US has no justification for any invasion of Iran, and can only use sanctions. North Korea is another story, one that the Clinton administration explored in 1994 as well, just like in 1998 with Iraq.

the Geneva Convention
The Geneva Convention applies by, of and between states that signed it. And I'm honestly tired of people who use the Geneva Convention to argue "legality" when it doesn't apply, such as its real, allowable detainment of combatants of belligerent nations without charge.

People should stop "pick'n and choosing" what they will agree to and what they will ignore. That's why nothing is ever solved and things only get worse. People like myself, who are generally concerned regardless of political parties and alignment, are few, and the number of Democrats and Republicans who argue the same non-sense at each other, ignoring their own parties and their leaders transgresses, are way, way too commonplace.
 
Re: Are we talking the CIA? Or soldiers?

Well let me ask a question. When has the US ever punished for water boarding? Or torture in general?! Answer me that!

What law has been made that says water boarding is illegal? Seriously?!

You STILL seem to conveniently forget the questions you asked. You asked those questions. I've more than adequately pointed out when we've punished for water boarding AND where it was established illegal. Now, you either didn't understand what I wrote with respect to those questions or you flat out didn't read it.

This is what I continually love about this thread. You bounce around context to fit your argument, the one I'm not making. The last time I checked, we're not talking about soldiers.

So, when have CIA agents been prosecuted for water boarding? The CIA admitted that they have used water boarding three (3) times since 9/11, before the DoJ "rules" (which you quite demonizingly called "orders," among other comments like "spin").

What bouncing around?? Apparently you were still confused as to where water boarding is made illegal. I demonstrated every jurisdiction that applies to agents of our government which prohibit torture. Local law enforcement are prohibited from torture. Federal law enforcement are prohibited from it. US Military are prohibited from it and OGAs are prohibited from it.

You again seem confused as to what it means to be a signatory of the Geneva Convention. It doesn't mean you may not merely torture other member signatories. Being a signatory of it means you agree that YOU (in this case the US) will not inflict torture under any circumstances.

Finally to the easiest part of your reply...Obviously there are 2 reasons why individuals at CIA have not been prosecuted for subsequent admissions of water boarding. First, the previous administration apparently not only sought to legalize such actions, there may be evidence they encouraged it. Sooo, why would they then prosecute?? Secondly, the Obama administration's policy tends to be so far, not to punish the front line agents who may have been subject to orders and more importantly, we've yet to see what facts are gleaned from any potential investigations that may in fact lead to prosecutions if some weren't merely following orders.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
The further we go in time, the more I dislike the Obama administration.
 
Top