Everyone, get your facts straight ...
N Korea also detonated ,with unprecedented Advanced warning in 2006 (under Bush's watch), a nearly 1 Kiloton NUCLEAR device of some sort.
It wasn't even close to 1 Kiloton.
In fact, people questioned if it was nuclear at all because it was sub-0.3 kiloton. A Russian thermobaric (fuel-air) bomb can almost do that, and it doesn't take that much TNT to simulate.
In a nutshell, it fizzled. It was not a sustained reaction. It clearly shows they don't know what they are doing. It was likely rushed out of political design, and not technically ready. The question continues to be if they did a proper test, would it not fizzle?
I know there is a strong dislike/mistrust of Obama out there ,but be realistic. This is a very complex situation which Bush obviously had no simple answer for either.
The problem is that Carter, during the Clinton administration, started the bilateral non-sense. That wet the North Korean's appetite in the hope continued "appeasement" from the US and US alone, by breaking terms and blaming the US.
The Bush administration said "no" after 9/11. They said 6-party talks only, to stop the 1-sided bullshit. North Korea is still hoping for a return to the bilateral non-sense, and keeps violating every term they can. Why? Because under the 6-party approach, they can't turn around and blame the US, because Japan and South Korea are right there, saying "no they didn't."
The Obama administration utterly agrees with the Bush policy on North Korea. In fact, Obama has repeatedly stated that we need to go after North Korea and Afghanistan (not Iraq).
South Korea also got tired of its "engagement" bilateral approach too. They've utterly cut off just about everything, forcing the 6-party approach. They are tired of the "screaming child" across the border, that does everything to break terms and blame the other party. With a 6-party talk system, that's difficult.
Especially with China saying right back to them, "the other 4 guys aren't buying it, shut up."
So what? :dunno:
If they were going to attackSouth Korea, they would have done it already.
But they can threaten to shell Seoul with 5,000 artillery shells in a matter of minutes, pretty much guaranteeing a genocide-level of death. That threat on its own is pretty much why we care.
That and the promise of China, to the US, to keep the Korean pennisula nuclear free, as we won't place them in Japan (not that Japan would allow them), South Korea (more debatable) or, most of all, Taiwain (which is their greatest concern
).
If you can't think that deep enough, you shouldn't be part of the argument. This has far reaching issues beyond just the simplistic analysis of the basic facts.