we wouldn't have to deal with this if Truman had let MacArthur nuke North Korea in 1951. just saying.
We should've let the Soviets nuke China when they approached us with the idea in 1971.
we wouldn't have to deal with this if Truman had let MacArthur nuke North Korea in 1951. just saying.
We should've let the Soviets nuke China when they approached us with the idea in 1971.
Are you sure they said China and not Chinatown? :dunno:
I love how you'd dump an ally of 60 years and tell them to give in to the aggressor.
Good thing you aren't in a position of making foreign policy.:bowdown:
South Korea is more powerful and could probably kick the North's ass if they wanted to. It wouldn't be like we would leaving them to the wolves.
True but we're not about to pull our Marines, AF, and Army troops out. Remember only a ceasefire was signed in '53. A state of war therefore still exists.
also it's a lovely strategic location for getting to anywhere in asia...just in case
and on the topic in general every other time kim jong il has flipped out like this we've shipped some commodities over (hennessy in particular cuz it's his favorite) and he's settled his little wanna be god ass down
China is North Korea's most important ally, biggest trading partner, and main source of food, arms, and fuel. China has helped sustain Kim Jong-Il's regime and opposed harsh international economic sanctions in the hope of avoiding regime collapse and an uncontrolled influx of refugees across its 800-mile border with North Korea. After Pyongyang tested a nuclear weapon in October 2006, experts say that China has reconsidered the nature of its alliance to include both pressure and inducements. North Korea's second nuclear test in May 2009 further complicated its relationship with China, which has played a central role in the Six-Party Talks, the multilateral framework aimed at denuclearizing North Korea. CFR's Scott Snyder and See-won Byun of the Asia Foundation argue the nuclear tests highlight the tensions (PDF) between China's "emerging role as a global actor with increasing international responsibilities and prestige and a commitment to North Korea as an ally with whom China shares longstanding historical and ideological ties.
...
China's support for Pyongyang ensures a friendly nation on its northeastern border, as well as provides a buffer zone between China and democratic South Korea, which is home to around twenty-nine thousand U.S. troops and marines. This allows China to reduce its military deployment in its northeast and "focus more directly on the issue of Taiwanese independence," Shen Dingli of the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai writes in China Security (PDF). North Korea's allegiance is important to Beijing as a bulwark against U.S. military dominance of the region as well as against the rise of Japan's military.
China also gains economically from its association with North Korea; growing numbers of Chinese firms are investing in North Korea and gaining concessions like preferable trading terms and port operations.
"For the Chinese, stability and the avoidance of war are the top priorities," says Daniel Sneider, the associate director for research at Stanford's Asia-Pacific Research Center. "From that point of view, the North Koreans are a huge problem for them, because Pyongyang could trigger a war on its own." The specter of hundreds of thousands of North Korean refugees flooding into China is a huge worry for Beijing. "The Chinese are most concerned about the collapse of North Korea leading to chaos on the border," CFR's Segal says. If North Korea does provoke a war with the United States, China and South Korea would bear the brunt of any military confrontation on the Korean peninsula. Yet both those countries have been hesitant about pushing Pyongyang too hard, for fear of making Kim's regime collapse.
...