Is it that you don't understand me or that you resent any one who doesn't write the way you do? Is it as simple as bias, mcbeetle? You have not directly engaged any of my questions or formed a coherent counter argument. You propose that I misunderstand the meaning of "tease" as it is used by her on her site. I understand it just fine but all the same its disingenuous (look it up). A sexual tease is that which provokes excitement with the promise of more. After 8 years of being lead on we know that this promise is false and her material offers no provocation of excitement. So some of us speak up. When this occurs her defenders fall back on the position that she is self-described non-nude model. This however is also untrue. She has shown partial nudity of various forms over the years. So if she were to accurately describe her site content it would be "occasionally semi-nude, non-stimulating, repetitive subject matter that is a tease only in description and not in fact." Catchy ain't it? Lying is sexier and if i could believe hers I'm sure i would find her material more satisfying. Enjoy your delusions.