I appreciate all you people that find all these posts... but damn. Dont you look at the thread? You have like 20 posts of the same damn photo shoot. How about this.... Post 1 when it comes out, and if anyone finds a post with her showing her NIPPLES then you can post that one as many times as you want. Dont any of you people who post these get annoyed when your trying to look for the good photo shoot and you get the same one you just looked at 20 times in a row? Use your head people...and im talking about the one attached to your neck.
 
I appreciate all you people that find all these posts... but damn. Dont you look at the thread? You have like 20 posts of the same damn photo shoot. How about this.... Post 1 when it comes out, and if anyone finds a post with her showing her NIPPLES then you can post that one as many times as you want. Dont any of you people who post these get annoyed when your trying to look for the good photo shoot and you get the same one you just looked at 20 times in a row? Use your head people...and im talking about the one attached to your neck.

I agree with you 100%. There's always one of us on every page who kindly reminds them as well. Then there are the other morons who think Nikki owes them something, so they blabber on about things (in over-simplified terms, but with the aid of a thesaurus) to which they know nothing...

Sort of been that way for like 4 years. :)
 
Is it that you don't understand me or that you resent any one who doesn't write the way you do? Is it as simple as bias, mcbeetle? You have not directly engaged any of my questions or formed a coherent counter argument. You propose that I misunderstand the meaning of "tease" as it is used by her on her site. I understand it just fine but all the same its disingenuous (look it up). A sexual tease is that which provokes excitement with the promise of more. After 8 years of being lead on we know that this promise is false and her material offers no provocation of excitement. So some of us speak up. When this occurs her defenders fall back on the position that she is self-described non-nude model. This however is also untrue. She has shown partial nudity of various forms over the years. So if she were to accurately describe her site content it would be "occasionally semi-nude, non-stimulating, repetitive subject matter that is a tease only in description and not in fact." Catchy ain't it? Lying is sexier and if i could believe hers I'm sure i would find her material more satisfying. Enjoy your delusions.
 
You have not directly engaged any of my questions or formed a coherent counter argument.

People aren't here to argue with you, no matter how much you write. People are here to look at pictures to jerk off to, not to discuss the merits of NN modeling. What a gigantic waste of time the past few pages of this thread have been with all this bloviating.
 
People aren't here to argue with you, no matter how much you write. People are here to look at pictures to jerk off to, not to discuss the merits of NN modeling. What a gigantic waste of time the past few pages of this thread have been with all this bloviating.
You sir, are a poet.
 
Top