*GASP*
...And that would be bad, why?
Her site is generally lame and only occasionally exciting. I am a fan of her body not her concept.
She hides behind the"tease" label like a bureaucratic shield. As though the site has a tacit disclaimer stating, "Warning: 'Tease' material herein. Site content may be frustrating and/or disappointing to viewers who dislike getting kicked in the junk." (NOTE: I didn't say you liked to have your testes stepped on, I just stated what the attitude rubs off as.)
"Teasing" in the context of sex is generally a prelude to a more satisfying, consummate experience. The whole point of a tease routine (in the grand old tradition of say, Gypsy Rose Lee) is to delay gratification; it isn't to withhold it. Sex denial is a different type of fetish more of the femdom variety.
I don't believe Nikki is a kinky femdom-type; if anything she's a bit of a sexual sub. However, where she's entirely Dominant is the money department. She's just about cash. Giving as little as possible to get the most out of the mark. And this is what I don't like about her: disproportionate quid pro quo. She's cheap with her product and transparently so. This, in turn, makes her comes off a bit hard and a bit mean.
*Cue: White Knight cavalry.