I was thinking last night while watching the Kings game when they were up 2 - 0, that even though I couldn't salvage any happiness from game 1 of the Wings series, atleast I didn't have to sulk in total depression thus getting to see the rangers LOSE in OT :nanner: and the Kings beating the Sharks in game 1 and then looking like they were gonna win game 2 kind of easy at the time as well, but the sharks mounted an attack and had me worried the series would be knotted up, but low and behold, a couple of penalties is all a hungry team needs @ the end of the game to do what they have to do to win, you know as I think about it, I am really not that sour about the delay of game penalties.
I think if the play is in the defensive zone and it doesn't touch the glass it should be a penalty, granted a lot of people, like you don't like this rule, as you mentioned, but I remember C. Chelios was an expert @ exploiting that technique, he was one of the best @ doing it during his playing days, I am sure there were tons of guys that were excellent in executing that play, but I remember someone using C. Chelios as an example of how great he was taking advantage of there being very little consequence for such an easy way out of trouble, I mean think about it NO icing call ( nowadays having the tired players stay on the ice) not back then though, and NO penalty for easily getting your team out of trouble and that's that.
I kind of like a punishment for a guy just flipping the puck out of play, granted it goes against your own team sometimes and they pay the price, but I think its a penalty worth having in the game, otherwise guys would just shoot it out of play, the team would get a change of players and a faceoff in there zone, the only consequence of that would be having a faceoff in your own zone, well not anymore and I think its a worthy rule, that's just me though. :2 cents: