Navy launches show of force near Iran

L3ggy

Special Operations FOX-HOUND

L3ggy

Special Operations FOX-HOUND
*sends Navy SEALs teams on the Iranian Navy*
 
I'd be embarrassed.

Navy SEAL's are coming up from the lake to ask why this wasn't posted in talk? What do I say when they get here? :eek:
 
Last edited:

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Classic saber-rattling. Oldest play in the book. Doubt it will have much effect. Still, Tehran is well-advised to back off its continued effort to develop nuclear weapons. I have no doubt that Bush will eventually carry the fight to Iran for real if they continue down that path. Really dangerous times in which we live.
 
Classic saber-rattling. Oldest play in the book. Doubt it will have much effect. Still, Tehran is well-advised to back off its continued effort to develop nuclear weapons. I have no doubt that Bush will eventually carry the fight to Iran for real if they continue down that path. Really dangerous times in which we live.



No, sadly after repeated statements from the White House that this is business as usual, I don't think he will hesitate either. I don't think he can. I think what ran through my head when I posted this is another, "No wonder the world hates the US scenarios". I have really come to believe this may end badly for all of us in the next 10 years. I think some historian on some other planet someday will write a book on how the US screwed up big time throughout it's reign, bringing about it's own demise.

Gun boat diplomacy.
 

DrMotorcity

Don Trump calls me Pornography Man
I'd be scared...

If show of force can prevent force in action - hail to the Navy :bowdown:

YEAH! I said "YEAH!"

I too, applaud the the presence that a force a-float can... imply. But then again, so did Teddy Roosevelt.

Go, Navy!!!

:bowdown: :bowdown: :glugglug:
 
You know...I wish we would either let diplomacy work or just get it over with and attack them, because, simply antagonizing them like this, will only make them more determined to build a weapon...and believe that they need one.
 

tartanterrier

Is somewhere outhere.
You know...I wish we would either let diplomacy work or just get it over with and attack them, because, simply antagonizing them like this, will only make them more determined to build a weapon...and believe that they need one.

I think we've stirred and fucked enough up without starting on some other poor sods.Maybe and when we fix Iraq and Afghanistan hopefully there won't be anymore shit :(
 
Classic saber-rattling. Oldest play in the book. Doubt it will have much effect.
I suppose Gulf of Tonkin was saber rattling too.


Roughneck's military axiom #542: When you force opposing military forces in close proximity, the threat of war due to accidents, mishaps and misunderstandings (all of which are by products of routine military deployments); rises by a square power for each day said militaries are in close contact.

cheers,
 
I suppose Gulf of Tonkin was saber rattling too.


Roughneck's military axiom #542: When you force opposing military forces in close proximity, the threat of war due to accidents, mishaps and misunderstandings (all of which are by products of routine military deployments); rises by a square power for each day said militaries are in close contact.

cheers,

Yep. And sometimes that's the desired outcome.

Didn't Churchill imply about merchant ships, (the Lusitania), "if some of it gets into trouble, better still"?
 
Last edited:

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
I suppose Gulf of Tonkin was saber rattling too.


Roughneck's military axiom #542: When you force opposing military forces in close proximity, the threat of war due to accidents, mishaps and misunderstandings (all of which are by products of routine military deployments); rises by a square power for each day said militaries are in close contact.

cheers,

Yes....that's the nature of saber-rattling.

Yep. And sometimes that's the desired outcome.

Didn't Churchill imply about merchant ships, (the Lusitania), "if some of it gets into trouble, better still"?

Absolutely. Nations (or their leaders, rather) have taunted fate deliberately hoping for some sort of conflict many times throughout history. Right here in the good ol' USA, you can go back even further than the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Roughneck (does the name "Pearl Harbor" ring a bell?). I just don't believe the Iranians will take the bait....yet, anyway.
 
Yes....that's the nature of saber-rattling.



Absolutely. Nations (or their leaders, rather) have taunted fate deliberately hoping for some sort of conflict many times throughout history. Right here in the good ol' USA, you can go back even further than the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Roughneck (does the name "Pearl Harbor" ring a bell?). I just don't believe the Iranians will take the bait....yet, anyway.

Iran don't have to take the bait. The Golf of Tonkin was fiction. The battle never happen. Don't you think W is capable of making up events and reality.
 
Sounds likes a possible billion of your tax dollars spent in area we really have no control over... Have we not figured this out yet?
 
Top