I think I'd be pissed if the Iranian navy ran maneuvers off the coast of New Jersey :dunno:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070523/ap_on_re_mi_ea/gulf_us_navy
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070523/ap_on_re_mi_ea/gulf_us_navy
I think I'd be pissed if the Iranian navy ran maneuvers off the coast of New Jersey :dunno:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070523/ap_on_re_mi_ea/gulf_us_navy
I'd be scared...I think I'd be pissed if the Iranian navy ran maneuvers off the coast of New Jersey
Classic saber-rattling. Oldest play in the book. Doubt it will have much effect. Still, Tehran is well-advised to back off its continued effort to develop nuclear weapons. I have no doubt that Bush will eventually carry the fight to Iran for real if they continue down that path. Really dangerous times in which we live.
Classic saber-rattling. Oldest play in the book. Doubt it will have much effect.
I'd be scared...
If show of force can prevent force in action - hail to the Navy :bowdown:
You know...I wish we would either let diplomacy work or just get it over with and attack them, because, simply antagonizing them like this, will only make them more determined to build a weapon...and believe that they need one.
I think we've stirred and fucked enough up without starting on some other poor sods.Maybe and when we fix Iraq and Afghanistan hopefully there won't be anymore shit
I suppose Gulf of Tonkin was saber rattling too.Classic saber-rattling. Oldest play in the book. Doubt it will have much effect.
I suppose Gulf of Tonkin was saber rattling too.
Roughneck's military axiom #542: When you force opposing military forces in close proximity, the threat of war due to accidents, mishaps and misunderstandings (all of which are by products of routine military deployments); rises by a square power for each day said militaries are in close contact.
cheers,
I suppose Gulf of Tonkin was saber rattling too.
Roughneck's military axiom #542: When you force opposing military forces in close proximity, the threat of war due to accidents, mishaps and misunderstandings (all of which are by products of routine military deployments); rises by a square power for each day said militaries are in close contact.
cheers,
Yep. And sometimes that's the desired outcome.
Didn't Churchill imply about merchant ships, (the Lusitania), "if some of it gets into trouble, better still"?
Yes....that's the nature of saber-rattling.
Absolutely. Nations (or their leaders, rather) have taunted fate deliberately hoping for some sort of conflict many times throughout history. Right here in the good ol' USA, you can go back even further than the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Roughneck (does the name "Pearl Harbor" ring a bell?). I just don't believe the Iranians will take the bait....yet, anyway.
Iran don't have to take the bait. The Golf of Tonkin was fiction. The battle never happen. Don't you think W is capable of making up events and reality.